alt.hn

8/23/2026 at 4:25:59 PM

Kodak DC50 now usable on the Apple II

https://www.colino.net/wordpress/archives/2026/08/23/kodak-dc50-now-usable-on-the-apple-ii/

by ibobev

8/23/2026 at 9:38:58 PM

The DC50’s resolution is a weird-ass 756×504 pixels

Most image sensors have a few extra rows and columns beyond their nominal resolution; this looks like such an extension of the common 720x480.

by userbinator

8/24/2026 at 5:20:21 AM

I still have my DC280. 1760x1168. Here's a sample (from the Jaques Littlefield tank collection).

https://www.w6rz.net/DCP_1004.JPG

by drmpeg

8/24/2026 at 12:05:53 AM

My first digital camera was the DC-215 which was 1152x864

by shric

8/23/2026 at 9:49:31 PM

1996 was also the launch of APS-C which had the same ratio. Curious if Kodak just reused existing hardware for the camera so matched that with the sensor?

by bradfa

8/24/2026 at 1:46:47 AM

I think that's a different question; i.e. the ratios of 756x504 and 720x480 are both 1.5:1 (or, as we say in the camera world)

IMO the most likely factor for camera makers (and/or sensor suppliers[0]) is 'how much resolution can one pack into a sensor for marketing purposes while keeping yield margin in check for profit'. Megapixels instead of Megahertz...

[0] - Maybe different back then but the current state is that even the 'big names' will get their sensors from 'competing' camera makers...

by to11mtm

8/24/2026 at 2:17:41 AM

I was going to say. It is also very close to CRT TV resolutions (or whatever you would call it).

by ColdStream

8/23/2026 at 11:55:17 PM

This is the sort of thing that lifts my spirits. Bravo, author!

by kstrauser

8/24/2026 at 12:32:42 AM

Agree! LLMs are interesting and useful, but this is creative!

by JSR_FDED

8/24/2026 at 1:56:42 AM

I live for posts like this. Bravo!

by fitsumbelay

8/23/2026 at 11:18:42 PM

[dead]

by effnorwood