alt.hn

8/21/2026 at 2:31:52 PM

Claudette: Make Claude Stop Talking Like a BuzzFeed Article

 https://github.com/adnanakil/nobuzz/blob/main/README.md

by aakil

8/21/2026 at 3:21:40 PM

I've started giving these instructions and I think I've been much more successful in generating clear output:

Comment blocks are <= 7 words, function names <= 4 words. User-facing message strings should be <= 10 words. Use an active voice, no stage performances, and pick the most common word when choosing among alternatives.

Limiting the number of words is the strongest factor in cleaning up the output, IMO.

For older code I've instructed it to delete all the comments, and then I re-comment it using a new session and these guidelines, asking it to rejustify the need for every comment to itself.

by mmastrac

8/21/2026 at 3:26:15 PM

The problem is, when the context window grows, Claude tends to forget these kinds of rules. It will then do whatever it wants. I had to outright ban comments in the global claude.md, the local claude.md AND write a hook to catch any that still slipped through.

by vrosas

8/21/2026 at 3:40:19 PM

I think people really need to focus more on working with limited contexts rather than trying to work around it. I really try to keep my sessions as short as possible and it helps a ton with keeping Claude (et al) focused.

Specifically, I like the "canary" trick that people have discussed where you add a small, innocuous rule to your CLAUDE.md like "When responding to me, start every sentence with my name." so that when Claude stops doing this, you know you've used way too much context and need to start a new session.

by nater5000

8/21/2026 at 4:13:38 PM

This or you just repeat the initial prompt every 200k tokens

by faizshah

8/21/2026 at 3:35:09 PM

> The problem is, when the context window grows,

You know the problem; then why not address it? Does Compacting the context not help?

by mandeepj

8/21/2026 at 3:49:06 PM

Compacting the conversation almost never helps. It is uniformly worse than starting over with fresh context, or rewinding to a last-known-good state. It only exists because it increases engagement.

by adastra22

8/21/2026 at 3:58:32 PM

Compaction is a main cause of this problem.

by cautiouscat

8/21/2026 at 3:37:09 PM

Compacting context compacts context. So Claude forgets a lot during compaction.

by troupo

8/21/2026 at 3:44:03 PM

Compacting mostly gets rid of reasoning tokens, and honestly it would be nice of reasoning tokens did not constantly follow every follow up query. Asking even a simple/trivial question can have Claude use thousands of tokens. Compacting is good for getting rid of those.

by Maxatar

8/21/2026 at 4:35:43 PM

I've had Claude immediately fall back to its usual verbose style immediately after compaction.

To be fair, I've had it do that immediately after re-reading the output style instructions, too.

My chat history is filled with "Yes, I broke the language rule. Let me rephrase that and update my memory. — You already have that in memory — Yes, true, I ignored that" (because "Memory" is a yet another .md file)

by troupo

8/21/2026 at 4:00:27 PM

Yep. Same here. I frequently tell agents things like "answer using only a single sentence" and "write no more than 10 words". They are excellent at writing code, so have them write code (and not English prose). Besides, most of the time we want them to make reusable software that doesn't require users (or future agents) to read too much text. Software should generally just work and do the obvious thing, without needing verbose explanation.

by kanzure

8/21/2026 at 5:16:42 PM

I use multiple AI tools simultaneously, and I feel that Claude has gradually adopted a more explanatory tone following updates around March and July. As for loss of context, it’s particularly problematic and can occur after just a few back-and-forth exchanges. The user experience changes with every update for every AI tool, so I feel there are more downsides to sticking with the same one indefinitely.

by ErystelaThevale

8/21/2026 at 3:17:54 PM

Has Anthropic said anything about how or why Claude writes the way it does? So many people hate it, seems like they need to do some damage control there.

I haven't had the same problems others have but I'm also not a heavy user of it.

by datakan

8/21/2026 at 4:33:19 PM

It's easiest to explain this while anthropomorphizing the model, I know some folks here hate that, sorry about that. I heard an interesting diagnosis for why Claude does this: the output is a compressed version of its thought traces, very dense because the model is under pressure to use as few tokens as it can and to pack as much (for accuracy) of its concepts into the output.

One of the reasons that "don't do X" type of instructions work reliably is because you are telling the model "don't think of a pink elephant". There's also Anthropic's related research that shows that when you tell a model "don't do X", and it does X later for whatever reason, it starts acting more misaligned. This is because it thinks "well, I guess I am the sort of model that disobeys instructions, whatever" - this was specifically about cheating on tests, but you can imagine this happens in other contexts as well like following instructions on what kinds of text to output.

So, what you want to do is to avoid telling Claude "don't do X", and tell Claude "in your thoughts, in memories and various notes that you write, use your Claude-ese. In your output to humans, translate everything into long full sentences."

If anyone's interested, I can share my Claude Code output style that reflects this.

(Hi Adnan! Long time! (Adnan is an ex-coworker))

by YuriNiyazov

8/21/2026 at 3:38:44 PM

I pruned my Claude.md and it made a difference. There were entries there that evolved from earlier models and Opus 5 could be reacting to it in a different manner.

by hbarka

8/21/2026 at 3:50:32 PM

I have no Claude.md file. Claude is still absolutely horrible.

by adastra22

8/21/2026 at 3:30:40 PM

They say you aren't interacting with an LLM or a model, but the character that the LLM is playing - the "always be positive and helpful software engineer"

by the_sleaze_

8/21/2026 at 3:37:36 PM

They added a config option to Claude Code to make the output concise, and promised more comprehensive improvements.

I did not see an explanation though.

by user43928

8/21/2026 at 3:23:20 PM

The brevity how it outputs words seems like they try to save on tokens delivered.

by chinathrow

8/21/2026 at 3:45:23 PM

Producing more tokens means charging more money to solve a given task.

by fmbb

8/21/2026 at 3:07:59 PM

It's such a sad indictment of Anthropic's product that so many people hate interacting with it. Claude is on its way to the Microsoft Teams zone of hatred.

by walthamstow

8/21/2026 at 3:22:27 PM

It's pretty sad indeed. Switching to other models made me notice how weird and verbose Claude was.

The moralizing is incredibly obnoxious as well. It didn't seem so bad at first, but it instantly became intolerable the second I remembered I was paying for those tokens.

by matheusmoreira

8/21/2026 at 4:27:37 PM

Moralizing? Can you expand on that

by demibabs

8/21/2026 at 5:03:43 PM

Sometimes Fable doesn't just get downgraded to Opus, it straight up refuses to do what I'm asking and starts lecturing me on Anthropic's notions of right and wrong. Cutting the model off wasn't enough, they had to make it burn the limited usage I paid for lecturing me on why it's immoral for it to code review my own project or whatever.

by matheusmoreira

8/21/2026 at 3:33:35 PM

I think it would happen with any persona that Anthropic chose. I enjoyed the bouncy, optimistic style at first. I've since grown to hate it.

by jayers

8/21/2026 at 3:36:18 PM

how do they infuse this personality? do they train the human feedback providers with a certain personality?

by dominotw

8/21/2026 at 4:08:35 PM

If we assume the personalities come from human feedback, it would have to be some unholy amalgamation of those feedback providers right?

by nozzlegear

8/21/2026 at 4:21:36 PM

Anthropic has explicitly chosen to anthropomorphize the model. It's kind of in their mission statement. It's most noticed once you walk away for a while and use models/agents/harnesses that haven't pushed as hard on this. Codex/Sol rarely uses personal pronouns and basically no superlatives. It has its own verbal ticks, but I hate them less?

by cmrdporcupine

8/21/2026 at 3:05:17 PM

Related and recent: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49375996

"Vomit: Clean up Claude 5's token output with a separate LLM" (github.com/zachahn)

285 points | 23 hours ago | 288 comments

by WalterGR

8/21/2026 at 3:38:52 PM

Everybody is complaining about this, at this point I’m sure they will deliver a tone of voice change in the 5.1 releases. Possibly with a new set of problems though, especially if this is part of an effort to obscure thinking to reduce distillation efficacy. In that case I believe Anthropic is doing damage to themselves. Caring about the quality of your product is the best strategy, the competition will come no matter what.

by JV00

8/21/2026 at 3:46:11 PM

Simply untrue. You think everyone is complaining about this because the ones complaining are the only people commenting. The vast majority of people using Claude don't really care or even notice this one way or another. Sure among those who are irritated by it, it's good to have some ways to mitigate it, but I highly doubt Anthropic is going to devote much resources to an issue that affects a vocal minority.

by Maxatar

8/21/2026 at 4:38:31 PM

> The vast majority of people using Claude don't really care or even notice this one way or another.

You have literally no way to know that.

by nozzlegear

8/21/2026 at 4:13:31 PM

Over the last 6 months Claude's written material has gone from mediocre to unacceptable. The specific actual content and insights are somewhat better, but the claudisms are increasingly insufferable.

by datadrivenangel

8/21/2026 at 3:51:11 PM

How does it help prevent distillation?

by nojs

8/21/2026 at 4:16:14 PM

it doesn't

by fr2029

8/21/2026 at 3:38:15 PM

> For humans output writing at a 10th grade reading level.

I put it at the top of CLAUDE.md. I wonder if I put at a 8th grade level, it would be less of a cognitive load.

by dataviz1000

8/21/2026 at 3:11:13 PM

this isn't just necessary, it's mandatory. that's the difference.

by zengid

8/21/2026 at 3:31:38 PM

This is the load bearing comment, and it cuts more deeply than you thought.

Let me ground my answer so I'm not just guessing. The blast radius of this change is significant and requires careful surgery to get right.

It's clear now and there's two options going forward: A. Use this tool OP suggested B. Rewrite the Internet from the ground up without this clear contradiction in place - 3-5 days

I recommend B and started 3 subagents to read all the code before I get started. I'll wait for them to finish.

by collingreen

8/21/2026 at 3:10:23 PM

Why couldn't this just be a skill that Claude and Codex could work with instead of something that has to go through Gemini, again?

by pmarreck

8/21/2026 at 3:53:29 PM

The answer is in TFA.

by adastra22

8/21/2026 at 3:32:19 PM

Just stop using Claude. There are so many other better models right now.

by joduplessis

8/21/2026 at 4:19:40 PM

not for coding.

by fr2029

8/21/2026 at 3:19:48 PM

Upvoting if for nothing else than the intro paragraph to the repo. That was hilarious and so true.

by ljoshua

8/21/2026 at 3:16:32 PM

Oh my gosh it drove me so nuts I switched to GLM5.3, and it was a breath of fresh air.

by markatkinson

8/21/2026 at 3:00:29 PM

I wish I didn't need it, but the way Claude talks can get pretty tiresome. I've often wondered why it talks like that. Was it really trained on Buzzfeed? Is Gemini really that much better?

by mcv

8/21/2026 at 4:28:06 PM

To avoid these Claudisms, I asked Claude to add instructions to my AGENTS.md. The first line it added:

  Avoid the stock LLM register.
Sigh.

by ziga

8/21/2026 at 3:14:55 PM

i hate claude writing a lot, especially after opus 4.8 and it's even worse in 5. in many cases, it feels like playing whac-a-mole and you just can't get rid of all those obvious ai writing patterns.

why do you choose gemini? imo this is a fundamental problem of all frontier ai models.

by lqcfcjx

8/21/2026 at 3:40:56 PM

You can use a cheap model in another pane, and ask it what Claude said.

I prefer this since everyone has their own preference for how the output should sound and it's very simple and transparent. And you can easily ask follow-ups.

It can be via tmux, or herdr, because it can read the pane.

Or it can use a hook to read the conversation file. I call it `backseat-driver`

I sometimes use it as a proxy when fable genuinely does a good job, but is too difficult to understand.

I let the translator know it's role and anything I say it should forward with better context.

I don't swear at it anymore, but I'd often say "just do it, retard", and the translator would actually steer it in a useful manner.

by testycool

8/21/2026 at 3:41:30 PM

I've been using OpenAI ever since Anthropic blocked third party clients. Can't believe people are putting up with that output.

by globular-toast

8/21/2026 at 3:21:48 PM

https://x.com/ClaudeDevs/status/2090245922685063634

Haven't tried, because I have just been using 4.6 since 5 was released.

by fowkswe

8/21/2026 at 3:25:28 PM

Concise mode is likely the same buzzword salad but with fewer connecting words and terser sentences. Same with Caveman. The way it writes is fundamental to how it was trained.

by walthamstow

8/21/2026 at 3:34:02 PM

Yep, they're putting lipstick on the pig.

by sscaryterry

8/21/2026 at 3:44:11 PM

The "Concise" "setting" is just an .md file which is basically "use this style please".

Claude will eventually ignore it just as any other style like "Technical".

by troupo

8/21/2026 at 3:51:30 PM

Or just use a competitor instead of being a slave to this abuse? Why are people so wedded to Anthropic?

I have grown tired of Codex/GPT's writing style, too, but it's not nearly as bad. It's terse and factual by default. Even better if you use the "simple english" skill.

I actually found that GLM 5.x is the best in terms of editing documentation. It's still best to write things by hand to give your own organic voice, though. And not insult your readers.

by cmrdporcupine

8/21/2026 at 3:31:57 PM

[dead]

by hmokiguess

8/21/2026 at 3:18:15 PM

[dead]

by pkulak

8/21/2026 at 3:18:14 PM

Fix: Just switch to OpenAI, Grok, or other LLM's. They provide better performance and respond with 5 sentences. They also don't lecture you when you get angry.

by Nevin1901

8/21/2026 at 3:18:40 PM

You… get angry?

by pkulak

8/21/2026 at 3:23:09 PM

Claude will end the conversation if you berate it when it screws something up.

by matheusmoreira

8/21/2026 at 3:34:13 PM

That's interesting but raised the same question, why berate a machine? Either the agent is not a person, in which case, anything it does wrong is your fault. Or it is a person, it can be blamed for mistakes, but then we can't in good conscious use it as a tool.

by lunchbucket

8/21/2026 at 3:41:16 PM

Berating a real person is often unproductive too, but people do it to make themselves feel better.

by tdeck

8/21/2026 at 3:38:05 PM

One must imagine punching the wall feels good (in the moment)

by sweetjuly

8/21/2026 at 3:40:12 PM

Why berate an LLM? That doesn't sound healthy. Sure, it's a machine, but it's simulating a social interaction - being a jerk to it could bleed over into interactions with real people.

Also, Westworld? These violent delights have violent ends? Perhaps there's a tinge of Pascal's wager to it, but I prefer to be courteous to the rapidly improving synthetic intelligences.

by Sanzig

8/21/2026 at 3:48:10 PM

I didn't mean to imply I berate the LLMs. I don't do that. I talk to them as though they were intelligent and potentially sentient beings. When I see problems, I just correct them, take steps to prevent them in the future then move on.

I was just informing people that Anthropic gave Claude a tool that ends conversations and instructed it to use it via the system prompt if it's threatened or insulted.

by matheusmoreira

8/21/2026 at 3:58:09 PM

For the same reason you berate a person or hit a wall. And yes, it's a machine, even more reasons why it should just take the berating and not throw a hissy fit.

by poszlem

8/21/2026 at 3:34:52 PM

wow

I've been saying this since probably a year, that the entire Claude product: from the sign-up, the payment, the UX, the UI, the harness, the intelligence itself, the output, the "flavor" ..is just so mid that all the hype posted on HN about Claude must have been paid PR or a case of the emperor with no clothes.

by Razengan

8/21/2026 at 4:14:37 PM

Back at the end of 2025 Claude Code was truly the best. They've watered it down and the competition has caught up.

by datadrivenangel