alt.hn

8/17/2026 at 8:03:55 PM

Nearly 1,400 live streams from Japan

 https://tomarigi.me/

by pajop

8/20/2026 at 4:18:23 PM

1,400 live streams.......... :|

1,400 live streams, Japan... :D

by hamper653

8/20/2026 at 3:27:16 PM

browsing around the tokyo area, wasn't expecting so many streams of ... streams. is there some reason for the number of cameras that seem to be filming under various bridges?

by namdnay

8/20/2026 at 3:43:03 PM

The Japanese government (more specifically the Tokyo Metropolitan Government) actually runs a lot of these for flood monitoring and prevention. You can find a feed for essentially all rivers so that during rain storms, each can be monitored. This supplements automated flood monitoring systems that don’t use video.

https://www.youtube.com/@TokyoSuibou/streams

by Shank

8/21/2026 at 2:40:10 PM

Of course! Thanks

by namdnay

8/18/2026 at 1:31:04 AM

Used to live in Yokohama. This is relaxing, to listen to the quiet traffic, thanks.

by kadonoishi

8/20/2026 at 3:56:19 PM

I like Yokohama tires.

by hyperionultra

8/20/2026 at 6:08:55 PM

Found the famous Shibuya crossing.

It doesn't look like I can link to it? It appears to be from a YouTube feed anyway (https://www.youtube.com/live/dfVK7ld38Ys).

by JKCalhoun

8/21/2026 at 6:44:31 AM

shame it is such a low quality, one would expect 720P be decent, but this is practically unwatchable due to heavy compression, likely the most famous place in Japan and they can't afford Full HD webcam with proper bitrate?

by Markoff

8/20/2026 at 5:13:05 PM

Cool.

If anyone were to propose such a thing in my country -- there would be hue and cry about national security and that this will be misused by anti social elements

How does Japan not have same concerns / voices?

by albert_e

8/18/2026 at 3:37:09 AM

Very cool because it has the reliability of YouTube streaming.

by Cider9986

8/20/2026 at 8:16:19 PM

What does the swasitka mean? I see it all over the map and assume it's not what it looks like to me.

by dopamean

8/20/2026 at 8:42:52 PM

The counterclockwise one is a Buddhist temple. The torii gate symbol is a Shinto shrine.

by rawgabbit

8/20/2026 at 8:19:05 PM

Before the Nazis co-opted (and corrupted) it, the swastika was commonly known as a positive religious sun-symbol[0]. In Japan, where it's called a manji, it denotes the location of Buddhist temples and Shinto shrines. Even ancient Christians used it[1].

Fun fact, which everyone probably already knows, one of the dungeons in the original Legend of Zelda for the NES was shaped like this[2].

[0]https://medium.com/my-bookmark/history-of-the-12-000-year-ol...

[1]https://christianity.stackexchange.com/questions/108825/why-...

[2]https://www.zeldadungeon.net/the-legend-of-zelda-walkthrough...

by krapp

8/21/2026 at 11:20:09 AM

Waaah, I just love the Japanese obelisk architecture and the special lighting they have in Tokyo.

by lofaszvanitt

8/21/2026 at 8:24:07 AM

Not many recreational boats in harbors. Same as in Northern Norway: Conditions mostly suck and there no particular places to boat to.

by timonoko

8/21/2026 at 6:57:01 AM

I wish there was something like this for China where you could see normal street life live, but for obvious reasons that's impossible.

by Markoff

8/20/2026 at 3:27:04 PM

jazz fusion track from Japan released in the 1970s or 80s with 'sun" or 'summer'

by thenthenthen

8/20/2026 at 4:57:19 PM

live stream working over tor.

by firefax

8/20/2026 at 3:32:04 PM

see also https://tabi.cam/

by L_226

8/20/2026 at 5:49:05 PM

Unfortunately, this seems somewhat unmaintained: five of the first nine "featured" cams have a dead/removed/copyrighted stream.

by w-m

8/18/2026 at 2:04:32 AM

Why is 독도 (written "竹島" in the map) depicted as a Japanese territory?

Some might say I'm bringing politics here, but the map itself is provoking strong political reactions.

by jackyard86

8/18/2026 at 4:19:06 PM

Maybe the Korean live stream map will depict it as a Korean territory

by harpiaharpyja

8/20/2026 at 4:55:43 PM

Because South Korea's territorial claim over the Liancourt Islands is contested by Japan. I'm actually surprised someone can read Takeshima, can write Dokdo, but isn't aware of the territorial dispute.

Edit: For anyone who isn't familiar with the dispute, no one lived in this series of islets until the late 20th century, when a Korean guy moved there. So there's no historical argument one way or the other.

South Korea argues that an island listed in a 1000yo historical record (Usando) is the present-day Liancourt Islands, but Japan says that record refers to a different island (Jukdo), and that South Korea has no historical claim over or tie to this series of islets. My personal feeling on this is that the document lists a few dozen people living there, and I don't think a few dozen people 1000 years ago could live on any of those islands. They're extremely tiny and the biggest one is just one big mountain. It's hardly "supporting 100 residents isolated from the mainland" terrain.

Japan's argument is that it controlled the islands, and the post-war treaty governing territory Japan was to surrender did not include Liancourt, so they still own it and that South Korea is illegally occupying it, going so far as to illegally attack the Japanese Coast Guard when it got too close to Liancourt.

If you look at a map, it's equidistant from both countries' mainlands (Japan is very slightly closer, and it has multiple small islands that are even closer, including one territory that sits almost between SK and Liancourt).

Japan's claim is that for centuries, they've exerted claim over this island specifically, pointing to historical records from the Tokugawa Shogunate. Then fin de siècle Japan reasserted authority over the islands to help it fight Russia and protect civilians on nearby Japanese islands (Oki is the one I remember the name of).

After WW2, there was a treaty where Japan surrendered territory. Early drafts of the document refer to Liancourt as Korean territory that Japan is to surrender, but the next few drafts referred to it as Japanese territory it was to surrender, and the final treaty completely excluded it. There's a US draft series and a UK draft series, and they aren't internally consistent, either.

Anyway, it's a huge mess that will never be resolved.

by KPGv2

8/20/2026 at 7:56:42 PM

As for why it matters at all. Besides national pride and prejudices.

The dispute is significant because controlling the islets dictates fishing rights and surrounding maritime borders (EEZ) in resource-rich waters.

by solarmist