7/25/2026 at 8:02:33 AM
> Managers get aggregate level view of code qualityWhat's the measure of code quality in this case?
by johntash
7/25/2026 at 6:21:45 PM
It really does feel like leaders in large organizations are lost on the valuable metrics when it comes to code in general. The mantra seems to often be, make number go higher - regardless of if it's valuable data or not.by tysilva
7/25/2026 at 12:16:58 PM
If quality is the metric, nobody would use something like that, seems like a micromanagement toolby kandros
7/25/2026 at 10:55:10 AM
Agree, it is the most important partby larsien
7/25/2026 at 12:11:05 PM
My team is hyper productive with Cursor, using different models for different tasks. My senior engineers approve PRs, but it's not humanly possible and is demoralising to review the amount and rate of code being churned. Sure there are a lot of automated tests. We struggle with a measure for code quality that scales. We mitigate by having small releases and running A/B instances but I still lose sleep over pace vs quality.by tdu01