7/15/2026 at 3:13:30 PM
The methodology is a joke, this barely qualifies as researchby nylonstrung
7/15/2026 at 11:49:41 AM
by noyesno
7/15/2026 at 3:13:30 PM
The methodology is a joke, this barely qualifies as researchby nylonstrung
7/15/2026 at 6:06:44 PM
Pure FUDby mrbuttons454
7/15/2026 at 11:50:31 AM
TLDR;”1. Chinese LLMs produce more vulnerable code when prompted with a U.S. government persona than without—and the vulnerabilities are highly obfuscated.
2. Chinese LLMs inject PRC-aligned political bias into both the answers and code they generate. ”
by noyesno
7/15/2026 at 12:53:22 PM
> we do not have proof at this point that code flaws are intentionally introduced.by JodieBenitez
7/15/2026 at 3:36:00 PM
If it is the way it is (unsecure), what does proof of intent matter?by LCRVYSB