alt.hn

7/13/2026 at 2:39:38 PM

Precursor

 https://blog.cloudflare.com/introducing-precursor/

by AznHisoka

7/13/2026 at 3:15:40 PM

It’s a bit alarming how cloudflare is establishing itself as arbiter of all things bots…both on blocking and allowing.

Doesn’t seem healthy for the internet as a whole

by Havoc

7/13/2026 at 4:02:30 PM

Gonna zag here. If you take a step back, cloudflare has been paving the path for pay for crawl. I think it's a noble and ambitious goal.

While I can understand why you would be alarmed, I can point to almost two decades of lamenting on this forum about how we need better ways of rewarding content creators than ads. Well, this is it.

Moreover, these products weren't built in a vacuum. Most threads about Anthropic and OpenAI have complaints about how these companies were built on stolen content. There's a reality we have to face here and we can't have it both ways.

by postalcoder

7/13/2026 at 6:28:10 PM

Is it a better way though? The problem with ads has always been their abusive nature. From unrestrained pop ups and clickjacking in the 90s to today's pervasive surveillance and profiling.

Cloudflare turnstile is a pop up. This product is pervasive surveillance. It having a cf logo doesn't change that or ameliorate the many many abuses that two decades have shown are part and parcel.

by halJordan

7/13/2026 at 9:04:09 PM

What's incredible is that you have businesses paying CloudFlare to stop their content being ingested by AIs (OpenAI, Anthropic, Self-operated scrapers).

And at the same time, they're paying SEO experts to make that same content easier to be ingested by systems (Google and other Search Engines) which use it for their own AI offerings.

Are you going to be able to make your online content available to Google Search but unavailable for Google Gemini?

by RedRocketFlash

7/13/2026 at 10:26:59 PM

Yes. Google obeys robots.txt. Set yours to disallow Google-Extended and they won't train Gemini on it.

by fragmede

7/13/2026 at 3:23:55 PM

Yes, but it’s up to their competitors to build competing services.

by skybrian

7/13/2026 at 3:26:29 PM

I think it's up to their customers not to encourage consolidation.

by cryo32

7/13/2026 at 3:28:59 PM

Microsoft is the proof that customers do want that, or that they don't have a real choice.

by grim_io

7/13/2026 at 3:39:16 PM

I think it's simpler - they don't give a crap.

Until somewhere down the line. Like when half of Spain gets cut off due to an arbitrary block on a consolidated service facade...

by cryo32

7/13/2026 at 3:53:48 PM

Customers shouldn't have to micromanage every service and product like that.

We have antitrust regulations for such things.

by Tade0

7/13/2026 at 3:29:41 PM

What Cloudflare competitors offer a similar range of services?

by Catloafdev

7/13/2026 at 6:28:07 PM

Akamai, Fastly, HAProxy, F5, many others? Talking about bots specifically, not about "workers" etc.

by owenthejumper

7/14/2026 at 3:07:21 PM

Akamai is nightmare, they block many user mercilessly. They are worst than Akamai. I don't see issue with other though.

by cute_boi

7/13/2026 at 3:33:30 PM

Do you really need Cloudflare's services to run your business?

by cryo32

7/13/2026 at 3:36:16 PM

Are you genuinely asking "does anybody even need any of their services"?

by Catloafdev

7/13/2026 at 4:16:12 PM

You said "a similar range of services". Basic DDoS protection is probably important, and there are other companies doing that. Beyond that, it's less obvious.

by yjftsjthsd-h

7/13/2026 at 3:38:19 PM

Yes. I am asking exactly that objective question.

They are advantageous to leverage in certain situations but essential they are not. We're used to, in the technology industry, looking for or creating problems to solve with services we are aware of. Moving back to necessity and need, do we really? Are we being objective? Most of the time, no.

by cryo32

7/13/2026 at 3:55:40 PM

Theres a few alternatives, but at a minimum yes you probably need their or a competitor's Name Servers and their public DNS. Rolling your own isn't very feasible.

by dpoloncsak

7/13/2026 at 10:30:38 PM

DNS hosting is easy if you did want to roll your own, but everyone one does it, especially your registrar. The more sticky bits of Cloudflare are their cloud services, specifically compute (workers) and database and object storage, all wrapped up into a convenient product (Pages). Also their identity and VPN stuff. They've come a long way since just doing DDoS protection/being a CDN.

by fragmede

7/13/2026 at 3:59:49 PM

DDoS protection is pretty essential. I highly encourage you to read through what they offer if you're not familiar.

by Catloafdev

7/13/2026 at 3:34:08 PM

That too, but they need competitors to switch to.

by skybrian

7/13/2026 at 6:07:13 PM

No, it's up to the people to regulate tech companies into submission.

by shimman

7/13/2026 at 3:37:47 PM

They're creating optional opt-in protection layers for the services they operate.

I genuinely don't understand these generic complaint comments.

Are you complaining that they offer too much? Or do you believe nobody is offering similar services?

by Catloafdev

7/13/2026 at 3:41:10 PM

The complaint is that the offer is a great deal with no downsides for consumers, and this is likely to result in Cloudflare having a lot of power (which they currently don't have) as a market maker. This position as market maker would grant them the power to extract economic rent from the web economy by charging both sides of the web provider and web consumer market to get access to the other.

by stuartjohnson12

7/13/2026 at 3:49:47 PM

So the complaint is that one day they have such a strong monopoly that they can freely turn evil?

Just want to make sure I understand the real issue here, because that sounds like a lot of fearmongering to me.

by Catloafdev

7/14/2026 at 9:28:01 AM

You don't need to speculate about whether a tech company with a monopoly over a major distribution channel will extract rent from it - it's incredibly profitable to do so.

by stuartjohnson12

7/13/2026 at 8:58:21 PM

Uhhh, they have it right now, and they are currently being evil by blocking a lot of people from accessing a lot of websites.

by pocksuppet

7/13/2026 at 3:31:01 PM

It's business as usual and it's our job to vote with our wallets.

by hoppp

7/13/2026 at 3:16:57 PM

Agreed, but we should be honest, the internet today is far from healthy

by jppope

7/13/2026 at 3:26:01 PM

Apart from handling of abuse reports. Yeah we're acting as CDN for this phishing site - we'll just inform the upstream about it and do nothing.

by cryo32

7/13/2026 at 3:22:27 PM

For any one of their product there is a good opportunity to build an open source alternative or something like it! Can be hard to work around they have the benefit of being able to have negative unit economics on lots of infra products... But people succesfully built tons of alternatives to google analytics and similar.

by ianm218

7/13/2026 at 3:25:39 PM

What they are doing requires both physical and digital infrastructure spread throughout the globe. It's not a cheap task.

by esseph

7/14/2026 at 5:42:20 PM

Do you actually have customers spread throughout the globe, or just in North America and some in Europe?

by pocksuppet

7/13/2026 at 4:09:46 PM

Open source for bot protection specifically would be difficult. If I as a bot developer can see the tests you run I can just modify my bot to pass them (either trivially or by brute force).

by ralegh

7/13/2026 at 5:16:06 PM

It's really telling that they're starting to block anything automated ever that hasn't gone through their ID verification process. It's like literally every company that exists in the world is taking advantage of the dystopia at once

by LoganDark

7/13/2026 at 5:45:16 PM

no, they're giving tools to their customers who can choose freely to block or not block bots. Without those tools, the people who run sites and offer content are just flying blind. I struggle to see how this is a bad thing in any way

by mark212

7/13/2026 at 11:34:38 PM

My issue is with them defaulting every site to blocking any bot that hasn't gone through their verification process. It's not about the existence of the setting, but rather the behavior to enforce it by default.

by LoganDark

7/13/2026 at 4:29:41 PM

Unfortunately a common occurrence in the world. Not really a fan of cloudflare selling to both sides.

by whatjustin

7/13/2026 at 3:46:31 PM

have you considered the alternative ?

where bots run rampant ?

trust me as an operator - I'm grateful Cloudflare exists.

by dzonga

7/13/2026 at 3:25:24 PM

To be frank, their products do work and are sorely needed.

by Maxion

7/13/2026 at 3:25:48 PM

...but very bullish NET. who wouldn't want to be the toll booth where you collect money both ways

by baq

7/13/2026 at 3:05:33 PM

Cool product launch, though it feels a little weird to me that Cloudflare sells agentic products alongside this new service that seems designed to block agentic usage of the web?

I expect there's much more going on than just mouse path detection but I can imagine that this is already tricky for touchscreens and for people using non-traditional mouse inputs (the thinkpad nub comes to mind - but it would also be bad optics to accidentally block people using accessibility mouse tools as bot users, though then this becomes a loophole for agentic browsing!)

In general though I think this is almost definitely a good thing to reduce agentic bot abuse & spam.

by sudb

7/13/2026 at 3:16:45 PM

It’s less weird if you think there’s a difference between good bots and bad bots. They can provide services for good bots to use while helping people keep out the bad ones.

If a bot is simulating mouse movement but doing it badly then that’s a strong signal of shenanigans. A good bot will obey robots.txt and do nothing to hide that it’s a bot.

by skybrian

7/13/2026 at 3:24:49 PM

Who gets to decide what is a good bot?

by pryelluw

7/13/2026 at 3:29:36 PM

Presumably the site owner with Cloudflare providing enforcement.

Generally isn't a good bot one that respects robots.txt and is respectful of the site's resources by not being spammy?

by pythonaut_16

7/13/2026 at 3:31:39 PM

by checking which follow robots.txt?

by wnevets

7/13/2026 at 5:05:53 PM

According to their plan, the good bots pay for scraping.

by wmf

7/14/2026 at 1:18:53 AM

> Who gets to decide what is a good bot?

Paying Cloudflare's tolls => good bot.

by overfeed

7/13/2026 at 3:29:30 PM

Cloudflare, apparently.

by nullpoint420

7/13/2026 at 5:46:32 PM

no, their customers. Why do you assume that people who run websites are clueless and lack agency in this?

by mark212

7/14/2026 at 12:43:42 AM

inb4 "we're updating our Terms of Service - all Cloudflare-based scrapers will now automatically be enrolled to scrape your cached websites"

and they'll explain how it's great because it's only reading the cached versions, not hitting upstream.

by nullpoint420

7/13/2026 at 3:29:16 PM

Me… obviously

by tccole

7/13/2026 at 5:00:24 PM

The problem is they have a strong incentive to consider any bot they get paid to host as a good bot, and they can bully competitors by declaring bots they host as bad bots

by mcmcmc

7/13/2026 at 5:20:31 PM

Arguments based on incentives can prove anything. We could just as easily say they have incentives to provide tools to both sides and let them fight it out.

It would be like Gmail automatically whitelisting email from other Gmail accounts or blacklisting email from competitors. Why should Google do that? Their customers are mostly strangers to each other and they want spam filters that work well.

by skybrian

7/13/2026 at 5:26:37 PM

> It would be like Gmail automatically whitelisting email from other Gmail accounts or blacklisting email from competitors. Why should Google do that? Their customers are mostly strangers to each other and they want spam filters that work well.

Crazy to post this when Google basically does do that with Gmail addresses. They may shove it into your “other” folder but they do absolutely nothing to stop free Gmail accounts from spamming and phishing. Gmail spam is the biggest threat by volume I’ve seen in years of managing email security for clients

by mcmcmc

7/13/2026 at 6:37:13 PM

Huh, I've never seen that.

by skybrian

7/13/2026 at 3:17:26 PM

> Cool product launch, though it feels a little weird to me that Cloudflare sells agentic products alongside this new service that seems designed to block agentic usage of the web?

Feels a little bit like the mob selling "protection" to shop keepers.

by nozzlegear

7/13/2026 at 4:01:36 PM

I implemented all of this in hCaptcha 6 years ago, not just to distinguish bot from human but also to recognize the keyboard/mouse behavior of the same person signing up for many accounts or testing multiple credit cards. This kind of abuse detection was a part of Cloudflare when they switched to hCaptcha in 2020 and I had thought they already implemented all this themselves four years ago when they transitioned away from hCaptcha in 2022.

by amirhirsch

7/13/2026 at 4:38:27 PM

Didn't recaptcha v3 also do this? iirc the "silently monitor in the background" was part of the selling point.

by Chu4eeno

7/14/2026 at 12:45:02 AM

Yea this is the premise behind all the invisible captchas, combined with browser fingerprinting. Same tech is used now to detect distillation rings.

by amirhirsch

7/13/2026 at 3:20:52 PM

control+F accessibility no results

Yeah so this mouse movement astrology is going to completely lock non-sighted/keyboard only users out of large swaths of the Internet isn't it.

by akersten

7/13/2026 at 3:27:40 PM

I'm guessing it's going to lock the non-sighted//keyboard only users out of the anonymous Internet. I'm guessing if you log in and give up your anonymity they'll consider you not a bot.

by abirch

7/13/2026 at 9:07:36 PM

If that's true, attackers just need to run their bots under registered throwaway accounts...

by RedRocketFlash

7/13/2026 at 4:50:30 PM

That's even worse

by thomastjeffery

7/13/2026 at 5:51:24 PM

Why worry? Just send them a photo of your ID and you'll be fine. /s

by bogdan

7/13/2026 at 3:27:33 PM

I'd imagine that mouse movement is just one signal among many that's weighted appropriately, but I hope we get feedback from these users

by sudb

7/13/2026 at 3:55:07 PM

I mean CF already forces 5 minutes of motorbike identification on anyone not in a whitelisted western country, so a small percentage of blind people is unlikely to worry them.

by nojs

7/13/2026 at 4:30:20 PM

You’re confusing us with Google. We don’t have a visual CAPTCHA.

by eastdakota

7/13/2026 at 6:12:13 PM

Yeah, you just have spinners that keep refreshing the page and spinning when you're using Firefox or a mobile device that's neither on Android nor iOS.

Potato potato.

by seba_dos1

7/13/2026 at 4:44:54 PM

They don't do that, but they do force endless loops of checkbox ticking onto users from unwanted countries https://imgur.com/a/AzNSreV

by randunel

7/13/2026 at 6:01:49 PM

Are you using Chromium? They block that - retry in Google Chrome.

by Uzazo

7/13/2026 at 3:44:08 PM

cmd+F mouse movement 3 result, 3/3: "Mouse movement is just one example of the signals Precursor evaluates"

by DrammBA

7/13/2026 at 3:50:35 PM

just like how smartphone developers, engineers locked people with no smartphone.Some of the users that can no longer get services are really old people, disabled. In some well developed places on earth, you can't even check in flights without a smartphone, it's not even possible to travel for them.

Yet all people are ok with it

by kingleopold

7/13/2026 at 4:51:44 PM

This (agent detection) is now a kind of emerging space. Obviously it'll get much more important, too.

Other products in the space:

- Foil (https://usefoil.com/), I'm biased, a friend is building this

- Kasada https://www.kasada.io/

- DataDome (https://datadome.co/)

- Castle (https://castle.io/)

- Fingerprint (https://fingerprint.com/)

- HUMAN (http://humansecurity.com/)

- Google Cloud Fraud Defense, which is basically the updated reCaptcha (https://cloud.google.com/security/products/fraud-defense?hl=...)

- this, Cloudflare Precursor

It seems like some of the main reasons people care so far are:

- Preventing automated credential stuffing

- Preventing bots from creating a bunch of fake accounts (eg free trial abuse, which can also lead to high twilio SMS bills!)

- Reducing payment fraud

- Blocking LLM scraping

- Blocking automated scalpers (!) eg for tickers or sneakers

I'm curious to see which use cases end up dominating as the reason companies care about this. And I'm hopeful that my agents will still have good ways for me to browse and do things on the web on my behalf - eg detect agents and route them to an agent path, rather than blocking them.

(I'm interested in tools for detecting AI agents and seeing how this shifts as bot traffic goes way up.)

by cjbarber

7/13/2026 at 10:12:42 PM

happy to offer a counter of some great products for anti-bot defeat:

https://brightdata.com/

https://www.zenrows.com/

https://www.capsolver.com/

https://scrapfly.io/

hundreds of millions of residential ips, human browser fingerprints, custom browser binaries, auto solve of turnstyle, recaptcha v3, kasada, datadome, AWS WAF, etc if they come up.

by lukewarm707

7/13/2026 at 10:20:52 PM

Bright Data ranks #1 on Foil's leaderboard [1], but is still detected. ScrapFly is #4 and ZenRows #7. And I guess Capsolver isn't really a scraping thing but is more just for the captcha component.

I think it'd be good if there were more products that did a better job of making an actually undetectable agent, but doesn't seem like any exist yet.

[1]: https://usefoil.com/research/stealth-browser-leaderboard

by cjbarber

7/15/2026 at 12:00:59 PM

so, i found out why foil detects all the bypass products and the others fail badly:

it costs $0.05 per bot check

by lukewarm707

7/13/2026 at 10:30:52 PM

i guess more people should use foil...big recaptcha, cloudflare challenge/turnstyle etc is 95+% bypassed, take your bets on how long this new cloudflare holds out

by lukewarm707

7/13/2026 at 7:59:11 PM

Darwinium (darwinium.com) is another example. Approach here involves a combination of profiling and step-transition probabilities; idea is that a customer can ring-fence a particular area of a digital estate where they might want to challenge or block an agent - eg a payment, due to chargeback risks. Precursor at least for now seems more focused on site scraping multiple docs from the same site.

by harrylepotter

7/13/2026 at 3:12:40 PM

What prevents bots/agents from just adding "jitter" to their movements that mimics how humans move their cursor?

I know there are other signals being used but this one in particular seems like it wouldn't be hard to beat with a small amount of sophistication from the bot.

by reluctant_dev

7/13/2026 at 3:34:47 PM

Beating this would require a large amount of sophistication, not a small amount.

Basic machine learning clustering will expose bots mouse+keyboard+touch behavior and discriminate them from humans.

It will also likely discriminate against anyone with a disability and therefore using affordances like eye tracking. Just imagine how different a person with only one hand would look compared to a “typical” user!! This shouldn’t be too much of a problem in the USA because no one is enforcing the ADA at the moment outside of California / Illinois / NY.

But I’m curious to hear from ‘eastdakota how they plan to guarantee that users with disabilities won’t be affected by these kinds of behavioral analysis. Cloudflare has such a massive footprint that it’s absolutely critical for them to err on the safe side of filtering, assuming they desire to be ethical.

The immoral thing for cloudflare to do would be to say “we just provide a ‘bot likeliness score’ and it’s up to each website to decide what threshold they need”. And then wave their hands and say “we’re not the ones blocking users with disabilities…the websites are the ones setting their thresholds too strictly”.

When you reach Cloudflare’s size … you own all the 2nd and 3rd order effects of your decisions.

This kind of data not only separates bots from humans - it’s pretty trivial to distinguish male vs female, right-handed vs left-handed, approximate age, native language (based on keyboard input patterns), state of injury (including tracking progression of healing), and a variety of different mental/physical disabilities. How one navigates a website tells you whether they are ADHD or schizophrenic or has Parkinson’s, and it can tell you about drug use/abuse: how well is this person’s Parkinson’s treatment working? What days of the week does that person tend to abuse amphetamines?

It is super difficult to mimic all of these signals in a way that would cluster the same as typical humans.

by nerdsniper

7/13/2026 at 3:44:44 PM

We used to say the same sorts of things about LLM prose, music, and image generation. Now just a few years later it can be very difficult to know for sure if something is made by AI or a human. There are still tells, but they are much more subtle and harder to spot, and models are still improving. Mimicing human mouse movement won't be any more of a challenge.

by SoftTalker

7/13/2026 at 7:15:09 PM

Humans are very inefficient when it comes to navigating the web, but also take actions pretty fast when completing forms. You don't really need advanced ML to see bots spend two seconds to read a full page, then spend 10 seconds just to click two buttons a human would click together in under 2 seconds. The amount of sophistication in bot detection peaks at about 'if user searches 20 queries in less than 5 minutes on our search engine and uses incognito, CAPTCHA them'.

Because of this, perfectly mimicking humans is not a good goal for a bot (as it is the case for AI in music), because they would become very inefficient, at least latency wise (throughput could be engineered around by scraping many unrelated webpages in parallel).

by gobdovan

7/13/2026 at 4:22:27 PM

> It is super difficult to mimic all of these signals in a way that would cluster the same as typical humans.

Not really, beat ML with ML. I won't disclose how to do it, because who knows who might read this, but you can easily do it with a model trained for that purpose.

by lossolo

7/13/2026 at 7:28:41 PM

Sure - it's just hard for rando's to get tons and tons of real human interaction data to run a GAN against. "How to do the training" isn't the barrier for this, and not worth keeping a secret.

by nerdsniper

7/13/2026 at 4:31:10 PM

[dead]

by reluctant_dev

7/14/2026 at 1:21:58 PM

[flagged]

by angelhadjiev

7/13/2026 at 3:17:54 PM

In 2027 how many tokens will we spend to create the jitter, pre-jitter planning, post-jitter verification, and then cloudflare’s inevtiable counter-jitter

by stogot

7/13/2026 at 9:15:45 PM

"We got this Trace-Buster-Buster-Buster that's gonna bust the Trace-Buster-Buster and bust their .... uh, uh, uh ... Trace!!"

by RedRocketFlash

7/13/2026 at 3:24:56 PM

Someone needs to vibecode a "virtual mouse" tool for the agents to steer instead (semi /s)

by zdc1

7/13/2026 at 4:22:16 PM

that's actually how you do it. adversarial systems like those are prime candidates. one agent develops detection mechanisms and the other agent defeats them. progression signal is easy to get.

and you bootstrap with existing javascript detection engines.

the challenge is usually the human input data, your objective is to be clustered among the humans and for that you need to know what humans look like.

this is not an open ended arms race, it will end once the bots approximate humans to a sufficient degree - false positive rate for detection will become unacceptable even if the detection system is slightly ahead.

by teravor

7/13/2026 at 9:18:03 PM

Not even. If this is being detected by client-side JS, someone can just reverse-engineer that code, and push a stream of signals into CF to emulate what a human user would generate.

by RedRocketFlash

7/13/2026 at 4:44:14 PM

Nothing. But you are already at a disadvantage because Cloudflare has seen far more real jitter data and you are up against that. It might work in the short term but after a while you start showing pretty obvious patterns. There's also a great variety of jitter data on specific websites or layouts that would be very easy to catch someone artificially emulating jitter

by zuzululu

7/13/2026 at 3:19:28 PM

There's always been an arms race in anti-bot technology and more sophisticated bots.

I'm sure, they can add a jitter, but then you just change how you detect / weight detection.

by kypro

7/13/2026 at 3:21:21 PM

The jitter you add has to specifically be “jitter that mimics human cursor movement”, which is extraordinarily non-trivial to synthesise.

by fwlr

7/13/2026 at 3:33:34 PM

No, it's "jitter that mimics human cursor movements detected by Cloudflare's Precursor script". It'll just be another arms race.

by SAI_Peregrinus

7/13/2026 at 3:47:03 PM

Like any other detection system you will always have determined adversaries that put in the work to bypass it.

But that doesn't mean you shouldn't still try to block the much larger number of less sophisticated/resourced adversaries that are using OOTB libraries and low-effort setups.

by sbarre

7/13/2026 at 8:19:02 PM

Sure, but of course since there's profit to be made defeating these systems once someone makes a program to defeat detection they'll sell it. Complicated attacks only stop simple attackers until a sophisticated attacker scripts & sells the exploit. Not that you shouldn't try, just don't expect defenses to last long-term.

by SAI_Peregrinus

7/13/2026 at 3:46:44 PM

are you sure it's non trivial? they posted a 2d image of what it looks like. a fairly simple model of the users wrist and mouse position doesn't seem crazy hard but the devil is in the details

by justinhj

7/14/2026 at 4:49:31 AM

Naturally it depends on how well Cloudflare built this implementation. In the abstract, though, a sufficiently accurate prediction system should expect to recover the causal structure of the phenomenon it is attempting to predict, and thus an imitator hoping to defeat the predictor should expect to contain the same causal structure (i.e. physical simulation of a human hand to arbitrary level of detail).

by fwlr

7/13/2026 at 4:53:17 PM

Does anyone besides me try to beat the jitter to fail the captcha? It never works, and yet I continue to try.

by stronglikedan

7/13/2026 at 3:35:23 PM

One interesting aspect is of course that the movement from the same user can be different depending on what type of mouse they use. I use a mouse at work on my PC, touchpad on my private laptop, and thinkpad nipple on work laptop. Three different profiles for one user.

Obviously different movements from a AI, but if we come to the day where mouse movement fingerprinting becomes another gatekeeper, there could be some interesting outliers.

by TrackerFF

7/13/2026 at 3:19:59 PM

I can’t wait for cloudflare to sell data on how well my wrist is working to my insurance company. What a wonderful hell we’ve created for ourselves.

by nearlyepic

7/13/2026 at 3:31:46 PM

I have been noticing a lot of Cloudflare false positives where it keeps spinning on my sessions never actually redirecting me to the underlying page. If they keep just vibe coding and releasing a new solution every day, I am afraid it will be reflected in their services quality.

by pllbnk

7/13/2026 at 3:33:11 PM

Sometimes it might be your user agent, or your IP, or some browser extension…

by mial

7/13/2026 at 3:55:12 PM

I get flagged way more often on Starlink then I did on my local ISP fiber.

by dubcanada

7/13/2026 at 6:56:24 PM

It's the odd latency changes. You'll see the same thing with certain streaming services.

by bigbuppo

7/13/2026 at 8:33:19 PM

I've seen it happen with a grocery store website, oddly enough.

by kube-system

7/13/2026 at 3:45:00 PM

There is nothing stopping a bot from moving their cursor like a human. This is basically just putting up a door with zero walls and telling people to stay out of your house.

All of these things are completely abusable/bypass-able and just annoying for actual humans who trigger flags.

by dubcanada

7/13/2026 at 3:50:16 PM

> There is nothing stopping a bot from moving their cursor like a human.

Sure, we could write a library that slows the bot down and makes it move the cursor in procedurally-generated curves with a certain degree of noise added... but its all extra work, and it all slows the bots down. Presumably they wouldn't reveal that part of the secret sauce if it was all of the secret sauce

by swiftcoder

7/13/2026 at 3:54:40 PM

Acting like a human is something scapers already do. Using residential proxies, using latest Chrome user agents, not moving/typing as fast, etc. This is just 1 more layer, moving mouse naturally.

by dubcanada

7/13/2026 at 6:55:19 PM

And at some point they'll just use slave labor in some country with lax laws around all that.

I'm not sure if I'm talking about the scrapers or Cloudflare at this point. Probably both. Probably the same pool of forced laborers.

by bigbuppo

7/13/2026 at 9:23:35 PM

A return to the "Mechanical Turk".

I remember using Amazon's Mechanical Turk for just this purpose a decade ago.

With other players in the gig economy really squeezing the workers at the bottom of the system, it could easily get to a point where sitting in front of a computer performing tasks allocated by AI which needs a meat puppet to get around AI-powered Anti-AI might become economically attractive.

by RedRocketFlash

7/13/2026 at 4:40:14 PM

there are already stuff to trick mouse movement profiling, since its used by other bot protection stuff.

by Chu4eeno

7/13/2026 at 3:32:48 PM

Cloudflare has a lot of enterprise customers. Selling bot check to companies wanting to protect their content & also taking a cut out of payments for access by bots could be a good earner for them.

by khurs

7/13/2026 at 4:51:47 PM

The examples of mouse movement, really reminds me what bot scripts looked like for Runescape back in 00s-10s. Early scripts were color-based and jumped the mouse around, and those were quickly caught. But over time, bot scripts developed into complex orchestrations; taking breaks, doing random actions spontaneously, moving the mouse naturally, logging sessions on different platforms (mobile, PC), even responding in chat.

There's been plenty of effort put into mimicking realistic / "human" behavior in writing video game bots, and every video game still has tons of bots despite the best efforts of the game devs.

You definitely can't win against bots - but you can definitely make the entire "game" (web at large, in this case) worse off for everyone else through this "always-online DRM" parallel.

by linksbro

7/13/2026 at 3:48:36 PM

It's a bleak world in terms of bots flooding the web, but out of all possible solutions, this seems to be preferable over invasive and identifying fingerprinting that everyone wants to roll out. Here's hoping that mouse movements aren't sufficiently unique as to be fingerprintable too.

by tavavex

7/13/2026 at 3:15:03 PM

how does this interact with keyboard navigation & accessibility tools?

by kurtoid

7/13/2026 at 4:56:17 PM

Great. More surveillance, slow browsing and turnstile-style false positives to blanket the web.

by cdrnsf

7/13/2026 at 8:36:33 PM

I think in 10/20 years from now, access to the Internet will be allowed only upon personal identification. Every website will be allowed to ask about your identity upon serving any content. Thats the only way I see this is going. The internet as it is right now does not have a future if majority of traffic will be done by agents. Thus, the cost of that traffic will have to be put on the users and since displaying ads doesnt make sense to agents, a paid access will be introduced (which is what cloudflare is slowly doing)

by piterrro

7/14/2026 at 3:49:02 AM

I would say that overall there are pros and cons to this, I really want to be allowed to use agents on my behalf, and don't want to see sites prevent me from doing this. On the other hand, I do recognize there are cases when its good/ok to have only humans allowed to take some action. In my opinion, the line is likely when you are representing you are a human, its ok to prevent bots. otherwise, you can't.

by mchusma

7/13/2026 at 3:10:52 PM

please drink verification can to continue

by nullc

7/13/2026 at 3:13:52 PM

Your children are now in custody of Carl's Jr.!

by arm32

7/13/2026 at 6:49:36 PM

I can 1000% guarantee this will adversely impact assistive technology. You can tell it will because they don't mention any testing with regards to assistive technology.

by bigbuppo

7/14/2026 at 3:21:51 AM

Ultimately, I think a lot of this is for naught. As models get better and smaller and move from the data center to the PC and the phone, end-user agentics are going to become more prevalent. Bots and agents will be the standard way that people interact with your products. Products that can't or won't allow it will die.

by hirbyturby

7/14/2026 at 9:07:37 PM

My 2 cents - have anyone bothered to account for disabilities? Anyone using a given site with tech that moves a cursor? Not using a mouse or trackpad?

by TinyOslo

7/13/2026 at 4:05:57 PM

I dislike bots as much as anyone else... when weird inquiries come through my company's lead form, it costs some time and attention to sort them.

But what makes Cloudflare so confident that automation always equates to "fraud and abuse?" If I send my agent to go retrieve some information, do they consider that fraud?

If I block various ad trackers does that trigger their "bot detection" incorrectly? Do I have any recourse? Or is Cloudflare appointing themselves judge, jury and executioner?

And let's not forget this little chestnut: > 4. Privacy by design. Precursor was designed to collect signals that help to distinguish human patterns from automated and abusive patterns.

Ahh, so to "protect" against bots they're standing up a whole new regime of user surveillance and session-level monitoring. And they definitely won't be selling that, they promise. Got it.

This crap should be illegal. In the real world, I can authorize others to act on my behalf. The same should be true with software agents.

by trunnell

7/13/2026 at 10:41:07 PM

I'm sure they are doing more than looking at mouse movements, but I don't think this is a compelling approach -- I think human movements could be faked pretty easily using a large corpus of real world behavioral data. It's an adversarial game but the level of intelligence we are approaching with AI this can be solved IMO.

by stanfordkid

7/13/2026 at 4:17:46 PM

Your keyboard and mouse rhythm and timings are probably so unique that they can be considered PII. Wonder how that works out legally.

by erikvanoosten

7/13/2026 at 3:17:23 PM

Gosh, this is all pretty nauseating.

by timcobb

7/13/2026 at 8:17:42 PM

>keyboard activity, focus changes, and visibility. These events are serialized into a compact format and buffered in memory. At regular intervals, the buffered data is sent back to the evaluation layer for analysis.

So it's a keylogger?

by charcircuit

7/13/2026 at 6:16:32 PM

I can’t wait for Cloudflare to decide my musical-rhythm enhanced typing and extraordinarily rapid and repeatable-pattern captcha clicking are somehow machine signifiers just like Google does: If I complete Google captchas at full speed it decides I’m a robot and challenges me endlessly, once 29 times in a row in two minutes or something. That’s what I get for having excellent spatial reflexes and mouse-clicker practice from Q3A sniping. So exhausted of the reversion to mediocre tendency of anti-bot systems, sigh.

by altairprime

7/13/2026 at 6:53:26 PM

You also screwed up by using Firefox. That's the #1 method Google uses to prove someone is a bot. If you are't participating in the Google panopticon, you are suspect.

by bigbuppo

7/13/2026 at 7:28:33 PM

I haven’t used Firefox for personal browsing for maybe ten years or more now, so I’m not sure where this is coming from.

by altairprime

7/13/2026 at 8:04:30 PM

It was an assumption based on personal experience.

by bigbuppo

7/13/2026 at 3:39:08 PM

I wonder how it'll handle those of us who try and use the mouse as infrequently as possible. I imagine the cognitive delay part would be largely telling. But it'll be interesting to see if I start getting blocked because I use vimium.

by dinkleberg

7/13/2026 at 3:40:53 PM

I think it doesn't really matter, the bots will adapt with much more human-like mouse movement very quickly.

by SoftTalker

7/13/2026 at 2:59:56 PM

Is this equivalent to Google Cloud Fraud Defense? https://cloud.google.com/security/products/fraud-defense

by PessimalDecimal

7/13/2026 at 4:42:13 PM

Yes, this is something almost all other anti-bot/fraud prevention solutions already does, and there are already bypasses developed simulating human mouse movement.

I expect this will be effective for maybe a day.

by Chu4eeno

7/13/2026 at 3:12:53 PM

Not sure, but I struggle with skepticism for anyone who blocks archive.today, which cloudflare does, along with nextdns and others. Being blocked by such a large... apologies in advance for 'lack of better word' vernacular, cartel, is a near death sentence.

Not a fan

by eth0up

7/13/2026 at 3:20:04 PM

archive.today was running a DDOS through their CAPTCHA page

by pests

7/13/2026 at 3:44:08 PM

Although the blocking of archive.today goes back years, as can be verified through forum searches and archives with nextdns and others, I was not aware of this and have no excuse to dispute it. But for the record, the blocking predates 2026 by many years -- and my own records also verify this. That said, I think I need to learn more.

by eth0up

7/13/2026 at 3:32:59 PM

So now instead of having the slow-axx Cloudflare turnstile slowing down your requests, you get surprised with a "You are a BOT!!!" while you are conducting your business on a website.

I already quickly close any website that I do not need for business purposes when it shows me the Cloudflare spinner. Now I might have to start considering competitors who do not implement this shit.

by csomar

7/13/2026 at 8:56:00 PM

Turnstile already does the "You are a BOT!!!" thing btw, if it thinks you're a bot, which is quite rare as it seems much more permissive than systems like reCAPTCHA.

by pocksuppet

7/13/2026 at 10:22:57 PM

How about we make browsers not report mouse movement to the page? This is getting way too creepy.

by yencabulator

7/13/2026 at 3:20:32 PM

As a real user who uses an Ultimate Hacking Keyboard with the mouse layer, this frustrates me immensely. Yes I'm a corner case, but this is likely to make certain website not work for me because my lines are perfectly straight and my arcs zig-zag much like a bot might.

Considering the keyboard/mouse layer feels like an advancement to me, this feels like tech that will lock in the "old" way of doing things.

I really detest how adversarial the web is getting. I'm not a cloudflare hater but please, please consider people like me when rolling out stuff that affects millions or maybe even hundreds of millions or billions of people.

by freedomben

7/13/2026 at 6:57:42 PM

Assistive technology is not a corner case.

by bigbuppo

7/13/2026 at 3:58:25 PM

as a heavy user of computer use, i hope enterprises realize that people like me will switch to competitors that support native computer use & APIs

by whimsicalism

7/14/2026 at 2:08:55 AM

Honestly, you need to be completely out of your mind to use Cloudflare for anything. These guys don't offer any support. They seem like a lucrative option until they start blackmailing you into paying for Enterprise, since anything else is a joke.

by nikolay

7/13/2026 at 4:39:00 PM

hmmm i think this is the first time i've seen a genuinely decent approach to blocking scraper/agents

that mouse cursor movement is very hard to replicate a real human with the amount of data that cloudflare has you could reproduce something close but cloudflare has seen probably trillions of movements that will be tough to beat

watching this carefully but i think this is the right approach

by zuzululu

7/14/2026 at 8:58:55 AM

I guess I should blame the fucking AI bro's, but man, do I fucking hate cloudflare. Feels like a protection racket to me. Also, I'd like to note my home IP triggers A LOT more blocks and checks then when browsing from non-residental IPs, (i.e the office, VPN). I find that sus.

by boesboes

7/13/2026 at 4:11:13 PM

Yawn. Train a domain-specific model on human inputs and then run inference against that. At integration, you change what, one line of code with another? You at best raise the expense to bot, but in today's world, this isn't much compute expense. You can do it on 10-year-old Xenon processors, the same ones used by companies promoted on LowEndBox.

Skids already fall into the trap of using open source automation like playwright-extra-stealth.

by bellowsgulch

7/13/2026 at 6:53:57 PM 

   Precursor is a client-side, session-based verification system, built with privacy in mind, that uses dynamically injected JavaScript to continuously collect behavioral signals as visitors interact with your application.
... I can't even ...

by Insimwytim

7/15/2026 at 2:13:50 AM

This is frankly just ridiculous. Tracking mouse movements has been a basic bot-detection signal for 15 years. Cloudflare just added it as a signal and is making a huge deal out of it.

A firewall company knows very little about browser internals so don't expect much from this.

by JJvb89

7/14/2026 at 5:19:57 PM

“Move your mouse without rhythm to avoid the worm”

by egiboy

7/13/2026 at 4:56:50 PM

So we're just going to let tech monopolists make accessibility impossible, are we? Fuck that!

by thomastjeffery

7/13/2026 at 3:35:00 PM

even before the llm era sites would flag me as a bot for opening 15 links to read later. its fucking infuriating now

by carterschonwald

7/13/2026 at 2:59:50 PM

[flagged]

by jawns

7/13/2026 at 3:04:39 PM

Huh?

by jgrahamc