Nvidia Halos | alt.hn

6/22/2026 at 2:23:42 PM

I noticed too much use of the word "safety", like the LLM was told to emphasise it, so I did a little test: randomly scroll and move the mouse without looking, is there "safety" in there? I did it for 4 times and every time I found it. Ctrl+F -> 136 results.

by mrd3v0

6/22/2026 at 3:47:04 PM

Safetyxploitation seems to be the key selling keyword for "old" business. Management won't approve any proposal without less than 100 safety mentions.

by frangonf

6/22/2026 at 2:58:36 PM

> Safety transistors safety assessed

by sva_

6/22/2026 at 3:17:11 PM

I was certain this was a joke...

by airstrike

6/22/2026 at 5:10:01 PM

I was expecting Beyoncé lyrics

by amirhirsch

6/22/2026 at 3:36:40 PM

Trillion dollar companies can't afford a team to proofread publications.

by himata4113

6/22/2026 at 3:52:43 PM

Until nvidia takes legal/financial responsibility for any accident caused by their self driving system it is not really safe.

by doikor

6/22/2026 at 2:37:26 PM

142 results now, they are multiplying!

by Chilinot

6/22/2026 at 3:15:52 PM

And 170 for just "safe." It really makes it awkward to read.

by chorkpop

6/22/2026 at 3:16:48 PM

I wonder if safety as in "taking legal responsibility" or some other kind of safety.

by dude250711

6/22/2026 at 4:14:22 PM

The primary focus of this product is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_26262 AKA https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Functional_safety for road vehicles. That means review from independent assessors who will demand finely detailed analysis and documentation of the entire system and the entire development process.

by corysama

6/22/2026 at 5:38:17 PM

safetymaxxing

by dominotw

6/22/2026 at 2:42:23 PM

I personally found this NVIDIA move very interesting. Automakers generally do not want to become frontier AI infrastructure companies and they love technology standardization.

The real technical challenge is rappresented by edge cases: a software that is excellent 99.9% of the time can still be unacceptable if the remaining 0.1% contains rare but catastrophic scenarios. And that's why we still don't see many self-driving vehicles on the roads today.

However, NVIDIA has a credible shot because it controls much of the loop - hardware, training infrastructure and simulation environment. If it works they will impose a huge vendor lock-in, difficult to replicate for other competitors.

by lucamark

6/22/2026 at 2:38:47 PM

I'm very exciting for Nvidia to meaningfully enter this space. I know they've been working on autonomous vehicles for a while now, but it seems like they are approaching a real product. Hopefully, they produce something that can be used on consumer vehicles. We really need good competition in this space. The US market is limited to Tesla FSD and no other manufacturer is even close. I'm not confident individual manufacturers could meaningfully develop their own solutions. A strong third-party option is a great direction for the industry.

by x187463

6/22/2026 at 5:46:13 PM

Someone please give Nemotron a thesaurus. This reminds me of the early days of SEO, where you try to hit 1% keyword density.

The new game is finding a single sentence with the most instances of "safe" or "safety". My current high score is 4..

by mNovak

6/22/2026 at 4:35:11 PM

Halos == HAL OS ? That didn't work out so well in 2001

by nsb1

6/22/2026 at 4:47:26 PM

No, it's actually Halos OS, which sounds like someone missed the pun during the meeting in which they named it.

by debugnik

6/22/2026 at 2:51:01 PM

18,600 engineering years sounds impressive to someone because it is the bulk of a career for 1,000 engineers. But it is less than two years for 10,000 engineers. The depth of understanding really hinges on which version is closer to reality.

Meta Horizons World probably puts up similar numbers if you sum up the hardware/software tech stack to get this number.

by svnt

6/22/2026 at 2:38:15 PM

I wonder if this product might be dangerous. Some subtle cues might assay my fears...

by tetris11

6/22/2026 at 5:31:02 PM

While this is fascinating, it's not a (brand-)new development.

Here's Archive.org's copy of the page from 2025 in September, their earliest copy:

https://web.archive.org/web/20250920031549/https://www.nvidi...

"Safety transistors safety assessed" exists in this version too

by no_news_is

6/22/2026 at 3:28:11 PM

Probably the only way to catch up to Waymo's technical lead is for every other player to collaborate. The world dearly needs another self-driving car option.

by xnx

6/22/2026 at 2:55:09 PM

Needs a human technical writer.

by xbar

6/22/2026 at 3:20:58 PM

I don't think a single human read this thing before they published it.

by space_ghost

6/22/2026 at 4:38:35 PM

Can this safety system safely solve the safety problem of driving with safety on a safe thin layer of fresh safe snow ?

by speedgoose

6/22/2026 at 4:10:14 PM

I miss when Nvidia made GPUs for games and my OpenCL renderers. What is this trash...

by pixelpoet

6/22/2026 at 4:12:15 PM

Controversially, Nvidia employs more than one person and so is in fact capable of producing more than one thing at a time.

by kristjansson

6/22/2026 at 4:31:03 PM

Thanks for your insight, though I was referring to the sidelining of their GPU consumer business and transformation into what it is now.

by pixelpoet

6/22/2026 at 5:02:41 PM

You can still buy and use Nvidia GPUs to play games. That was the case during the crypto boom, the AI boom, and now the RAM shortage too.

It's also hard to blame Nvidia for the pivot, from where I'm standing. Their proprietary middleware like PhysX, DLSS and RTX has been memed to death by PC gamers, while high-margin edge and datacenter customers are chomping at the bit for CUDA compute. Nvidia's raster stack is more-or-less complete, the things that PC gamers are asking from them are not realistic or fairly priced at this moment in time.

by bigyabai

6/23/2026 at 5:34:39 AM

> the things that PC gamers are asking from them are not realistic

gamers always want cheaper and faster gpus. its the same thing data centers want but they care about ray tracing and fragment shaders instead of raw number crunching power. its only "not realistic" in the sense that nvidia alone cant do much to lower prices when theres a memory shortage and they depend on tsmc.

by tancop

6/22/2026 at 6:31:55 PM

> Nvidia's raster stack is more-or-less complete

That was my point. It's not even a pivot! They're still making consumer cards! They've even product-differentiated enough that the consumer cards are still on the shelves at close-to-MSRP, despite world-historic demand for adjacent parts of the lineup.

Being _mad_ at Nvidia in this setting is weirdly possessive - a business that was 90% gaming is now 10x larger and 9% gaming[1]. You haven't lost ground!

[1]: numbers made up but you get the point

by kristjansson

6/22/2026 at 4:45:59 PM

Is anyone else amused that the car shown on the landing page looks a lot like a Tesla Model Y, which famously does _not_ use any Nvidia chips (Tesla onboard computers have been AMD based for some time now)?

by ykl

6/22/2026 at 5:07:32 PM

No, that's a Mercedez EQE. MB is the launch partner for nVidia's alpamayo-based autonomous efforts.

by martythemaniak

6/22/2026 at 7:39:08 PM

IMO, this LLM-generated crap must be flagged. Doesn't matter that it came from Nvidia.

by akomtu

6/22/2026 at 2:21:27 PM

The page had so many LLM-isms that I just can't make sense of.

> 18,600+ Engineering years invested in vehicle safety to date

What does this even mean?

> 7,000,000 Lines of safety-assessed code

Are we seriously using LoC as a measure of productivity again?

Not to mention the em-dashes

by yogorenapan

6/22/2026 at 3:43:03 PM

I don't think it's LOC for productivity, it's LOC which have passed safety scrutiny. We're talking about the kind of code which would pass muster on something like NASA's safety assessments, probably. Takeaway: it's a huge codebase which has been audited for safety.

by greenpizza13

6/22/2026 at 3:42:47 PM

> Are we seriously using LoC as a measure of productivity again?

Yes, sadly. Because its how everyone justifies LLMs. "Look at how much code it writes!" is the only measure they can come up with to sell its usefulness, completely forgetting that it'll be more useful if we started talking about how much code they remove.

by thewebguyd

6/22/2026 at 2:23:37 PM

> What does this even mean?

If it means what I think it means, you take every engineer working on it (and maybe the years of research involved) and add it all up. Say you have a room with about 10 engineers with 10 years of experience per developer, you can claim there's 100 years of developer experience between all of them (maybe the overlaps not unique enough and its more like 30 to 50 years? but in this case I think they're rounding up, and I assume it means thousands of engineers involved in the project) that's how I took it.

My first interview in tech I was asked what the heck I was even doing with the D programming language, followed by the remark that in the next room (where all the devs were) there was at least 100 years of experience between everybody there, and not a single one knew what D was, my manager clearly did, which cracked me up.

by giancarlostoro

6/22/2026 at 2:30:12 PM

> What does this even mean?

It means over 18,600 engineering hours have been spent working on vehicle safety. This is a pretty common metric.

by deelowe

6/22/2026 at 2:39:07 PM

However, it's one of those metrics that tends to be kind of meaningless. Vehicle safety team uses GPUs, so lets bill all GPU driver teams to the metric... that sort of thing

by swiftcoder

6/22/2026 at 2:42:34 PM

But they say years, not hours. Either it's a typo or nvidia has a ton of engineer and they all work 24/7.

by maeln

6/22/2026 at 3:43:22 PM

You missed the "21+ billion safety transistors safety assessed" gem.

I don't even know what that was supposed to mean. Hopefully all the safety transistors in the safety graphics card of my safety-PC were safety-assessed, too /s

by myrmidon

6/22/2026 at 4:15:07 PM

How else are you supposed to counter all the danger transistors?

Hot take here, but personally I feel they should safety assess the danger transistors, reducing the need for so many safety transistors.

by roboror

6/22/2026 at 4:25:22 PM

This is a weird way for Nvidia to announce they're going out of business.

by DiabloD3

6/22/2026 at 4:41:01 PM

They already seem to have fired all humans in the marketing team.

by debugnik

6/22/2026 at 4:51:01 PM

They have their own LLM, might as well use it and then screw their biggest customers that are in the business of LLM-aaS

by DiabloD3

6/22/2026 at 2:29:19 PM

Great! Safety!

by ms_by_pd

6/22/2026 at 6:32:44 PM

Is what?

by MoonWalk