6/23/2026 at 3:01:27 AM
I read the article and sadly I think the author missed a key thing that is going on.Yes, there are few people who created cyberdecks as a counter-culture, anti-company tool (which is a lot of what the author argues).
But some of the newer ones they highlight are nothing more than engagement farming reels. They are the very definition of the opposite of what the author writes here:
> We want to escape the algorithmic plantations that tech companies have herded us into.
I don't know of they fail to see this because they are blinded by their hope or there is a more complex viewpoint I'm missing.
by nl
6/23/2026 at 3:56:48 AM
Are you sure this isn’t just because it’s the “wrong” people who are building them? Instead of the typical (older) FOSS/geek/whatever crowd?It feels overly negative to me. People, mostly younger people, are building them, tinkering with them and are excited to post about them. Is it any surprise they’re doing so on TikTok or wherever? Yes, it’s a little ironic considering the anti-big-tech vibes mentioned in the article, but is it any different from when our lot were posting to Google+ etc?
I don’t know, this feels like a good thing to me, and something we should encourage. The more people playing and experimenting with tech rather than passively consuming the better.
If I was a teenager again today I like to think I’d be hacking one of these together.
by sandcat_
6/23/2026 at 6:06:05 AM
Nah, it's not "the wrong people" but "the wrong purpose" with the purpose being no purpose or rather just "looking good on social media".Which, don't get me wrong, is generally fine, because not everything has to be functional, art is important, bla bla bla. Problem however is when the algorithm gets involved and "being not part of the mainstream" becomes a mainstream metric to optimize for.
This feels like that, and - as it often has happened - it weaponizes the usual stuff to defend itself. Which we do not want, because the stuff it weaponizes is actually important, so it should not be tainted by the big value extraction machine in the cloud.
by hypfer
6/23/2026 at 10:01:13 AM
So basically, when punk music goes becomes mainstream so its no longer counter culture, it is part of the culture. In a way you could say that mainstream culture is very good at "Embrace, extend, and extinguish".by calgoo
6/23/2026 at 11:20:29 AM
Read "No Logo" by Naomi Klein.It basically explains this mechanism in great detail.
by MSFT_Edging
6/23/2026 at 8:35:22 PM
A good book.by chickensong
6/23/2026 at 8:53:47 AM
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recuperation_(politics)by da_grift_shift
6/23/2026 at 3:28:36 PM
There's nothing particularly technologically counterculture or transgressive about running a stock Raspberry Pi using stock Raspberry Pi OS or, worse, an x86 PC. If anything, it's a mirror of the modern world: a garish, tasteless surface layer of individuality concealing conformity and helpless dependence on "the man" within.Bunnie Huang's Precursor project was a genuine act of rebellion against the locked down nature of modern computing. These cyberdecks are tacky cosplay accessories for adults.
by ThrowawayR2
6/23/2026 at 4:33:10 AM
Hmm perhaps you are right.I think I'd over indexed on the unfinished look of some of them, but relooking at them as prototypes instead of the level of the original set makes them seem more reasonable.
by nl
6/23/2026 at 6:03:20 AM
Most of the cyberdecks you see, though, are just cosmetic variations on "raspi in a pelican case". Some of those cosmetic variations are definitely impressive, but the guts are mostly the same between builds. The guy who 3D-printed a bespoke case to make it look like it was off the set of The Martian did an amazing job, but it's still just a raspberry pi, a display, and a USB mechanical keyboard, less interesting from a technical perspective than the one that's more or less the same, but using a beer can speaker and an 18V drill battery as a power supply, but again still just a raspi.While there are definitely a few notable builds that involved actually-interesting technical problem solving, I think most cyberdecks make more sense through the lens of physical concept art exploring what a rugged or perhaps ultra-personalized personal computer can be.
by stackghost
6/23/2026 at 9:28:21 AM
I just clicked the page and then noted that the very first visual example under the header "What is a Cyberdeck?" was a TikTok embed that I can't view because it claims to be a private TikTok (and I have no idea if that's actually the case or if my local adblocking is somehow screwing up the TikTok embed). But the broader problem is that whoever made the thing found it useful to post about it on a social media platform run by a large Chinese corporation, that probably all their relevant peer group uses. I think it's unlikely that they care that I can't see their content because TikTok is broken for me (or they set it private for a reason). Regardless of what hardware they build, they are not meaningfully escaping from corporate-controlled tech.by JuniperMesos
6/23/2026 at 3:22:45 AM
Agree. Any hobby can become superficial content for Instagram, especially if your only or main source of information is online channels. But real communities exist, and you need to be in the real world to experience them firsthand.by edgarvaldes
6/23/2026 at 3:25:21 AM
Not arguing that real communities don't exist!I'm arguing that the author's main point is based on the Instagram posts, and this is invalid.
by nl
6/23/2026 at 9:19:13 AM
I think both sides are true. Of course, there's a certain irony in proclaiming one's escape from the yoke of Big Tech on the very Big Tech platforms one claims to be escaping.It's also telling that the most popular videos are about building the most visually striking Cyberdecks and not about building what a Cyberdeck is actually useful for—that's what gets engagement on short-form video platforms.
But I think it's a massively positive thing overall:
-Women, LGBTQ folks, and other underrepresented groups are finding their way to these nerdier hobbies.
-People are getting tired of technology taking over their lives, specifically attention economy and surveillance tech.
-People are learning about electronics and understanding that there are other ways of doing things.
I fail to see the negative in this. Even if none of these cyberdecks are used for practical purposes, someone learned something new. And, even if their cyberdeck gathers dust, being conscious of their tech usage might change how they use their MacBook or the internet more generally.
I think what you're saying is a bit like criticizing someone for not being a self-sustaining farmer because they only grew their own vegetables one summer and then quit.
They may not only eat their own vegetables, but that experience may lead to them buying from farmer's markets vs. Big Food. And that's a net positive.
by FinnLobsien
6/23/2026 at 3:35:52 AM
I don't know of they fail to see this because they are blinded by their hope or there is a more complex viewpoint I'm missing.There is. "We want to escape" is a very different viewpoint from "we want to liberate the masses."
Freeing yourself from the social media is definitely doable. Depending on how firmly engaged you are at the moment, it can vary in difficulty between fait accompli and moderately challenging. It's obviously possible for anyone to do themselves.
Liberating the masses? Morpheus said it best:
"The Matrix is a system, Neo. That system is our enemy. But when you're inside, you look around, what do you see? Businessmen, teachers, lawyers, carpenters. The very minds of the people we are trying to save. But until we do, these people are still a part of that system and that makes them our enemy. You have to understand, most of these people are not ready to be unplugged. And many of them are so inured, so hopelessly dependent on the system, that they will fight to protect it."
by chongli
6/23/2026 at 3:44:43 AM
> "We want to escape" is a very different viewpoint from "we want to liberate the masses."I don't think this is a point the author spoke about at all.
To crudely summarize what I think their claim is: Cyberdecks are an anti-big tech creation. They are spreading outside traditional hackers and the proof is these reels.
My claim is that cyberdecks are not spreading, and instead those reels is just evidence that (a) people will mine all subcultures for topics that they can create views from and (b) the author themselves is enabling this behavior.
by nl
6/23/2026 at 6:22:09 AM
They are spreading but the tech bro forums, as always, hate it. Make your case creative and not another grey 3d printed case? You'll either get ignored or condescended to.Post your creation on a social channel not dominated by white bros?
You are fake, a culture miner and engagement farming.
See the post above for a textbook way of rejecting anyone who isn't a white tech bro.
by rsingel
6/23/2026 at 7:30:04 AM
I wrote the above post. I like the creative cases!But maybe you are right and it isn't just engagement mining. I think my problem is more that I'm comparing the level of finish on the original cyberdecks to these ones, and they don't compare well.
But perhaps I should be thinking of these as prototype level ones.
(It's also very valid to point out the original ones were so well finished because they were engagement mining too)
by nl
6/23/2026 at 7:51:40 AM
If I listen to X band. Watch Y film. Am I doing it purely for myself or have I been prodded by society in some way?Am I a 'real' fan of band X, or not, because I only got into them with there latest hit album?
This isn't a new thing. Niche thing becomes popular. Fans of niche thing try to gate keep.
My biggest critique would be that the author doesn't realise the 'algorithmic plantation' they are in. The only cyberdecks I've seen are made by white men. Not trans and black people.
Further I don't even think it's about cyberdecks per se. That's the in thing. Before that it was neo pixels or whatever. People like to make things, and people are influenced by others. The cyberdecks isn't the counter cultural element. It's the making of whatever that is. Cyberdecks are just the latest thing.
by benj111
6/23/2026 at 5:14:56 AM
My opinion is somewhat that the last "real" cyberdeck was the Hackberry Pi, which is essentially the Blackberry I always wanted and that they never produced. Due to it being fully open, there's an insane amount of 3d printing community overlap, where people share their upgrades, designs, modifications and customizations.Raspberry Pi as a platform has revolutionized access to computers in my opinion, though since the RAM crisis started not so much anymore due to the insane price differences. But the Hackberry is the computing device where I think it has lots of potential for being my actual "Linux on the go" that I wanted but never got ... for the last 15(?) years waiting for it.
by cookiengineer
6/23/2026 at 7:43:46 AM
Depends what you define as a cyberdeck. If you look low power/ non-linux there are many innovative decks: https://hackaday.com/2023/03/06/low-power-challenge-the-pota...https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HK0uAKkt0AE colorforth deck
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kn0MxHlima0 discrete deck built like the tandy 1000
If Cyberdeck builds get people building, then it's all good. Farming does encourage others to build so it's all heading in the right direction :)
by alexisread