6/16/2026 at 4:10:49 AM
by eln1
6/16/2026 at 9:44:54 AM
Considering Apple's support and product cycle. You are looking at a Billion devices supporting JPEG XL between now and end of next year. It might be low in percentage, but it is still a substantial number.by ksec
6/16/2026 at 9:32:49 AM
As an aside - My Firefox updated the other day and now has no sign up VPN built in with multiple countries available to choose. Very welcome feature.by y2244
6/16/2026 at 9:02:50 AM
I've been testing JPEG-XL on nightly, it's a lifesaver for high-res photos. Half the size of PNG with no quality loss.by jadecarter68
6/16/2026 at 1:29:13 PM
What sites already are using JPEG-XL en masse?by nateb2022
6/16/2026 at 4:30:11 AM
How is the support for JPEG-XL across other browsers and local photo viewer applications?by intelkishan
6/16/2026 at 5:03:03 AM
Sure, most, see e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JPEG_XL#Official_software_supp...by eln1
6/16/2026 at 8:05:33 AM
> As of 2026, web browsers that support JPEG XL had 14% market shareFrom your link.
by esperent
6/16/2026 at 10:42:24 AM
https://caniuse.com/jpeghuh, yeah, says 14.12%... i could have sworn it's on by default in chromium now? it worked in my browser!
nevermind, i had the flag enabled previously :/
by throawayonthe
6/16/2026 at 5:46:39 AM
https://caniuse.com/?search=jpeg-xlDoesn't look very good.
by brokenmachine
6/16/2026 at 6:30:50 AM
Waiting for enabled by default in Firefox (already in nightly 153) and Chrome (hopefully this year).by eln1
6/16/2026 at 8:04:05 AM
Is there any hardware accelerated jpeg xl implementation? Like VA-API's VAProfileJPEGBaseline for jpegby nextaccountic
6/16/2026 at 10:38:43 AM
could you tell more/point to resources about hw-accel jpegs? does it make a difference for some sort of pipeline/batch operations or 'normal' use too? are there issues with some jpeg features being unsupported? i haven't heard almost anything about thisby throawayonthe
6/17/2026 at 9:08:34 AM
it's a throughput thing yes, or in my case it's also a desire to not hog the cpu with bulk image processingfeatures like progressive jpegs and some color spaces aren't supported. I think it could be but it isn't and not sure why
jpegs found in the wild will typically not make use of hardware acceleration or use just it for a subset of the decoding (not sure about the details). browsers didn't bother using hardware acceleration for jpegs just for the images that can be processed fine
so it is meant for jpegs you control rather than jpegs you find on the web. unless you convert them yourself
by nextaccountic