alt.hn

6/13/2026 at 5:43:02 PM

GameBoy Workboy

 https://tcrf.net/Workboy

by tosh

6/13/2026 at 10:14:22 PM

I had some good fun writing non-gaming apps for the playdate console including a browser [1] and Kagi news mirror [2] and feel the device has great potential as an alternative to android/iOS duopoly

[1]: https://github.com/remysucre/ORBIT

[2]: https://github.com/remysucre/cranky-news

by remywang

6/14/2026 at 1:06:42 AM

I had never heard of the Playdate but it looks like a very interesting device... and... I want it? Would you suggest getting one?

by xstas1

6/14/2026 at 2:45:02 AM

I would've got one if it wasn't so pricey for these specs. You can get a cheap Anbernic for 40-60$ running linux, with decent ARM CPU and a good backlighted screen.

by archargelod

6/14/2026 at 5:19:59 AM

I really like my playdate! Lots of indie games, and their Lua API is very good, coming from someone with no prior experience with Lua or games programming.

by remywang

6/14/2026 at 5:10:51 AM

The games are quirky and too many use the crank, IMO. That said, if you want something a bit more unique than everything else it’s a fun toy.

by Auracle

6/14/2026 at 3:17:28 AM

I was given one and it had some fun gimmicks but if doesn't really last beyond a few sessions. The ecosystem is strange and I just went back to a "real" device a bit after.

by ddtaylor

6/13/2026 at 10:58:52 PM

Here’s a nice YouTube video about GameBoy WorkBoy; a hardware addon and software productivity apps for the game boy,’unreleased and recently recovered https://youtu.be/1Y98jj3Kn84?si=dMII3mTmeDI0XrCn

Sorry if it’s in the article, I can’t access it either

by daniel_iversen

6/13/2026 at 9:08:07 PM

Blocking Apple iCloud privacy is pretty extreme.

by marcosscriven

6/13/2026 at 9:36:14 PM

It isn’t blocked. It is on for me and the site loaded fine.

by dmitrygr

6/13/2026 at 9:45:32 PM

It was at the time. Now it’s loading fine. In the 403 screen it specifically called out iCloud privacy.

by marcosscriven

6/14/2026 at 4:21:34 AM

It was on for me again, 6 hours later.

Ah, another domain for the blacklist.

by DocTomoe

6/13/2026 at 9:36:02 PM

It’s basically “give me your IP address before you can continue so we can better data mine you”

by retired

6/13/2026 at 10:08:14 PM

Yeah, the community run TCRF wiki is banning VPNs just so they can mine your data along with the luxurious $400/mo they're getting from Patreon. And not because they're constantly being besieged by rampant bots that they have to resort to such drastic measures.

by as1mov

6/14/2026 at 6:00:45 AM

Funny it works for me while being on a vpns that gets blocked everywhere…

by thenthenthen

6/13/2026 at 11:00:31 PM

Why not use a captcha or turnstile?

by calmworm

6/13/2026 at 10:27:34 PM

I don’t know anything about TCRF or what they do as their website blocks me. I do see trackers from multiple big corporations on tcrf.net.

What bots are using Apple Private Relay?

by retired

6/13/2026 at 10:41:48 PM

This is fascinating to me, because you just said you can't see it, but also that there are "trackers from multiple big corporations". Can you tell me what those are?

I ask primarily because we explicitly don't use any trackers, to a degree I actually pride myself on running a website that doesn't contact anything else: https://mini.xkeeper.net/private/C58L77azpY.png

The sole exceptions are YouTube embeds, afaik. I even switched out the MediaWiki and CC badges to be local.

by Xkeeper

6/13/2026 at 10:49:21 PM

uBlock Origin shows nothing out of the ordinary but Youtube, Google and Doubleclick, so Google, Google and Google, and I assume all of those are due to the embed.

by Telaneo

6/13/2026 at 11:07:10 PM

If you mean the block page, yes, that's just the YouTube embed. You'll see the same results on any wiki page that has a YouTube embed for the same reason; it's not tracking or anything I have control over (other than outright not having YouTube embeds). But I think if anyone has concerns over that, they're better addressed at the local-user level by disabling all unauthorized iframes.

by Xkeeper

6/14/2026 at 3:19:14 AM

There are lightweight YouTube embeds like https://github.com/paulirish/lite-youtube-embed. It’s lauded for faster page loads, but it likely has good privacy implications too since it basically just loads a thumbnail unless you click on it.

by MarioMan

6/14/2026 at 8:09:37 AM

Maybe don’t do YouTube embed if it’s just a flickering logo. Use a GIF for that.

I’m not disabling my VPN if a website with multiple trackers asks me to.

by retired

6/13/2026 at 11:02:40 PM

On the “ Sorry, you are not allowed to access tcrf.net right now” page I get tracked by Google, YouTube and DoubleClick according to the report by Safari.

I also have 924 kilobyte of data stored on my device after visiting tcrf.net without any consent.

by retired

6/13/2026 at 9:41:38 PM

ooo free data!

by LRDEV111

6/13/2026 at 6:34:31 PM

Site blocks VPN users.

by calmworm

6/13/2026 at 10:49:29 PM

Unfortunately true. I wrote about it early last year here: https://blog.xkeeper.net/uncategorized/tcrf-has-been-getting...

The story has not changed much. Every so often I will remove most of the blocks put in place, and within a few hours I'm back to having to block them. Many of the cheaper VPNs are also hosted on AWS / Google Cloud / Azure (or other cloud providers), which are also unilaterally blocked.

I would much prefer we did not have to do this, but it is what it is.

by Xkeeper

6/13/2026 at 7:21:21 PM

This is why you should self host your VPN.

by deadbabe

6/13/2026 at 10:30:57 PM

But where do you self-host it? Most sites that block VPNs also block VPSes

by Retr0id

6/13/2026 at 7:31:53 PM

Does that not defeat the anonymity aspect?

by retired

6/13/2026 at 7:50:05 PM

VPNs even from big public providers have not been a reliable way to protect anonymity for a while now. Use VPNs for cryptographic security and circumventing region control.

by deadbabe

6/13/2026 at 8:49:56 PM

You mean pseudo anonymity, from advertisers mostly?

by DANmode

6/13/2026 at 9:07:15 PM

Many of us only like legitimate users, and therefore block VPNs.

by ErroneousBosh

6/13/2026 at 9:18:37 PM

What makes a VPN user inherently “illegitimate” in your view?

by lxgr

6/13/2026 at 9:52:11 PM

The problem is the whack-a-mole game with hackers and script kiddies. It used to be the case that banning known colo ASNs was enough to get rid of nuisance by STROs, then there was a flood of hacked routers being used for DDoS that was really annoying to get rid of, and then came "residential IP" VPNs and commercial VPNs, both of which get routinely abused by AI scrapers and frankly, the AI scrapers are a worse enemy than the skiddies of 10 years ago. They ruin everything.

And you as a site operator can't really tell apart skiddies, griefers, AI scrapers and legitimate users apart any more.

by mschuster91

6/13/2026 at 10:05:47 PM

What are they doing exactly?

by deadbabe

6/13/2026 at 10:20:04 PM

Almost as if you shouldn't be banning users because of their IP unless that IP specifically has openly attacked you.

Or I guess you can just DENY ALL.

by therein

6/14/2026 at 4:23:22 AM

Well, you can just give me a list of the domains you operate, and I can put them in the network blacklist.

by DocTomoe

6/13/2026 at 7:00:38 PM

The linked video seems to provide a much deeper story: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=SZcrPM-jDqY&ra=m

by ant6n

6/13/2026 at 10:41:11 PM

yes, amazing complement to a super rare non-release (but protoype) exists.

by initramfs

6/13/2026 at 7:44:39 PM

When I try to share this page on iMessage it unfurls the link as "LLM / AI Standard Test Page" so I guess I won't share it!

by dbalatero

6/13/2026 at 8:50:59 PM

You can choose to display the text of the link,

instead of letting your device’s defaults decide who you are,

and then telling all of us about it.

by DANmode

6/14/2026 at 1:33:39 AM

Downvoters: Just press and hold, lol…

by DANmode

6/13/2026 at 11:52:00 PM

Does anyone know where can I find contents for the 2020 gigaleak?

by marethyu

6/14/2026 at 7:11:44 AM

nvm, I found it in archive.org

by marethyu

6/13/2026 at 8:54:21 PM

The original "work from anywhere" setup, as long as anywhere had two AA batteries.

by willXare

6/13/2026 at 9:03:24 PM

Four AA

by asdff

6/13/2026 at 9:39:54 PM

Anywhere with enough ambient light.

by retired

6/13/2026 at 10:19:33 PM

10 AA

by pfannl

6/13/2026 at 11:55:09 PM

I remember this being shown in Nintendo Power. As the kind of kid who liked computers and gadgets I really wanted one, and read the article many times.

But of course it never came out.

by MBCook

6/14/2026 at 7:11:07 AM

Applaud the preservation.

by snvzz

6/13/2026 at 7:03:46 PM

Access seems pretty strict

——

403 Forbidden

You are unable to access this site.

Sorry, you are not allowed to access tcrf.net right now.

If you are using a VPN, try disabling it first. We block many VPNs because of abuse.

If that does not work, the block may be due to one of the following reasons:

You are connecting using a network we have blocked. Your connection is still using a VPN or proxy (incl. Apple Private Wi-Fi, CloudFlare relays, etc.) You are a badly-behaving or unwelcome bot (ChatGPT, bingbot, yandex, etc.) You are using a badly-behaving extension (eg. Imagus, etc) that is trying to load every single version of a file in the background If you were able to view pages before, and this error message has suddenly appeared in place of what you were expecting, make sure you are not running any extensions or tools that are attempting to download everything at once. It is possible you were manually blocked, and it might be removed soon. If not, well, sorry.

If this page always apppeared, there is likely not a lot you can do. If you are using a VPN, turn off your VPN and try again.

Sorry for the trouble. We have been under a long-running DDoS attack.

by dgellow

6/13/2026 at 8:51:59 PM

403 Forbidden is just the modern version of blowing into the cartridge.

by willXare

6/13/2026 at 7:08:06 PM

That's weird, I can connect just fine over mullvad.

by free_bip

6/13/2026 at 7:10:59 PM

I'm on Mullvad and got blocked.

by MrDrMcCoy

6/13/2026 at 10:13:36 PM

30 out of 34 comments are about the content blocking.

Only four comments are about the content of the article, and none of them really go into depth.

This has been at the top of HN all day. If people can't see it, what gives?

by echelon

6/13/2026 at 10:53:47 PM

People who can see the article can see that it's incredibly mid and not worth commenting on.

But for people who can't see the article, it could be anything! For all they know, they're being kept out of the greatest content of all time!

by Bratmon

6/13/2026 at 10:36:35 PM

From my logging, most people can access it just fine.

As for "what gives", I have no idea. The article itself isn't interesting and doesn't contain much of value; the "game" itself is what is interesting, but that's not what the article is there to cover.

So my guess is it's just only the people who can't see it, because for others there's not really much to discuss. I don't know why this was even posted here, to be honest.

by Xkeeper

6/13/2026 at 8:51:28 PM

[flagged]

by Asfand2099

6/13/2026 at 9:04:32 PM

Where are you seeing this?

by montag

6/13/2026 at 9:12:25 PM

It's probably a bot account that tried to read the article to come up with a reasonable comment, but TCRF likely serves a "you're a bot, go away" static response page when it's accessed by bots. Pretty funny.

by iamjackg

6/13/2026 at 9:14:50 PM

I take that back! It seems to be happening to multiple people using VPNs. My bad. I should have been more charitable.

by iamjackg

6/13/2026 at 9:51:13 PM

Funnily I think you are still right re. the specific account under discussion.

by girvo

6/13/2026 at 9:18:06 PM

There do seem to be annoying false positives, but this particular account really is a bit strange. Months of silence after signing up, and then this non sequitur…

by lxgr

6/13/2026 at 9:40:10 PM

The style is also very LLM-y, though not a complete slam dunk.

by rcxdude