alt.hn

6/5/2026 at 7:15:36 PM

Accidentally deleted subscriptions for chat integrations (Slack and MS Teams)

https://www.githubstatus.com/incidents/2nmfnbknhlnv

by SparkyDogs

6/5/2026 at 7:47:44 PM

I've been running GitLab internally on k8s for 6 years, it handles code, CI, security scans, build artifacts, helm charts, etc. It runs a nightly backup to a GCS bucket.

Monthly upgrades are painless. Once a year the major versions (18 to 19, for example) bump external dependencies and we need about an hour on it.

I've been using GitHub for other projects and for the life of me I can't see a single area where its better. Actions is worse without versioned and self documenting components, there's no concept of a project hierarchy or inherited permissions, even simple things like setting up deploy keys are more annoying than they need to be.

I can't speak for GitLab.com - I've never used it.

by tapoxi

6/5/2026 at 8:00:37 PM

Gitlab.com used to be slightly less available than GitHub but recently I think the tables have turned and Gitlab saas is relatively stable.

I also enjoy Gitlab as a platform. It's got everything, good board, good repo, good issues, good CI, extremely good registries. It's got the equivalent of gists and pages... It a better product all things considered.

GitHub just wins because of popularity. It's WordPress all over again, the thing people use because it's a thing people use.

by gchamonlive

6/6/2026 at 7:08:54 AM

If only they stopped changing UI's just for the heck of it

Recently they changed the issues list, and it just got worse

They changed the merge request list to be way too smart, making assumptions about user's workflows

To me it feels like they have way too many engineers looking for things to solve that arent really problems

The CI system is great though

Running it self hosted is also generally without any problems - although they just broke my upgrade to 19 because they decided to remove mattermost

by jaapz

6/5/2026 at 8:01:31 PM

> I've been using GitHub for other projects and for the life of me I can't see a single area where its better.

Triggering github actions manually is way, way cleaner. Also the pipeline configuration feels cleaner to me bit that might be personal preference more than anything else.. Otherwise I agree. =)

by liquidgecka

6/5/2026 at 8:40:58 PM

Enterprise pricing is a huge factor.

by foobarian

6/5/2026 at 7:44:33 PM

Anyone who deletes Microsoft Teams deserves a raise.

by paulbjensen

6/6/2026 at 12:10:06 AM

Nobody has ever been fired for deleting a Microsoft product.

by amelius

6/5/2026 at 7:53:50 PM

Harsh, but fair.

by psygn89

6/5/2026 at 8:37:29 PM

And yet still better than Google Meet/Calendar/Workspace.

by burnte

6/5/2026 at 10:18:46 PM

Better in what aspect? All the categories I can think of teams is worse

by stogot

6/6/2026 at 1:00:33 AM

Maybe spin up a couple more H100 for Copilot.

by this_user

6/5/2026 at 7:46:40 PM

Huh, this is an incident now?

Our github->slack subscription breaks every few months, they never acknowledged it before. At this point we have a doc with the list of repos and settings, whenever someone notices that things are awfully quiet we just go through it and resubscribe.

by progbits

6/5/2026 at 8:30:19 PM

I think Slack requires reauthorization after some time. I get asked to sign back in to various accounts after a while.

by mynameisvlad

6/5/2026 at 7:37:01 PM

https://isgithubcooked.com/

by zikohh

6/5/2026 at 9:40:32 PM

does that calendar look like copilot and claude superimposed over one another

by numpad0

6/5/2026 at 7:44:35 PM

How long before github deletes all repos? or make private repos public? and such and such?

by natas

6/5/2026 at 8:05:46 PM

I saw this show up in RSS feed on Slack before here. Interesting, posted a message about it.

Not 2 minutes later, a coworker sent a message saying they got a message: their repository messages couldn't be sent, because the user is no longer authorized. The coworker was worried that they might be fired.

Alas, this economy is a terrible time for one business's fuckups to cause worry about people being fired. That's a lot of stress, man!

If only it were measurable in dollars, then we could sue Microsoft for damages. Maybe then Microsoft might stop producing slop. Ahh, wait. Who am I kidding? No, of course that won't cause Microsoft to stop producing slop.

by inetknght

6/5/2026 at 7:44:06 PM

I'm sure AI will fix it

by pluc

6/5/2026 at 10:55:21 PM

Just a few billion more tokens bro, I swear bro, just a few billion more tokens will fix it!

by nozzlegear

6/5/2026 at 8:09:20 PM

Maybe count this in the "feature,not a big" column?

Github is making engineers more productive by turning off distracting fake work tools

by rsingel

6/5/2026 at 11:25:17 PM

Huh. I was wondering why my auth expired and I had to resubscribe in one of my channels.

Everything has an expiration date it seems. I assumed I just missed a reminder email or message.

by wglass

6/5/2026 at 8:29:24 PM

Ramifications of the slopification

by gottagocode

6/5/2026 at 8:58:06 PM

So they lasted 9 days [0] until another incident and this time they deleted subscriptions for Slack and MS Teams?

GitHub's reputation has been long overcooked and you are better off self-hosting and you would have better up time than GitHub.

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48293202

by rvz

6/5/2026 at 8:27:10 PM

Namecheap suspending neocities, and now Github deleting subscriptions. I am all for the watching the world burn.

by doublerabbit

6/5/2026 at 7:44:15 PM

five bucks says this was Claude

by ginkgotree

6/5/2026 at 7:49:16 PM

Anthropic coming out quick to say it was Human Error that leaked all their Claude Code source… 110% confirmed to me that it was Claude that was involved.

There was a trillion dollars pushing for them to quickly say it wasn’t.

by SV_BubbleTime

6/5/2026 at 7:36:34 PM

Probably agentic gone wrong again.

by ufocia

6/5/2026 at 7:34:52 PM

One bug after another over at GitHub. What is going on over there?

by Chinjut

6/5/2026 at 7:49:20 PM

The migration to Azure. Maybe AI. ¿Por qué no los dos?

https://damrnelson.github.io/github-historical-uptime/

by joezydeco

6/5/2026 at 7:57:34 PM

“Por qué” not “porque”. One means “why” the other “because”.

by loloquwowndueo

6/5/2026 at 8:29:14 PM

Gracias!

by joezydeco

6/5/2026 at 7:39:35 PM

Reliance on AI and stupidification of humans I guess.

by steve1977

6/5/2026 at 7:44:06 PM

> "As much as 30% of Microslop's code is now written by artificial intelligence"*

*approximately 8% of the above quote has been adjusted to better reflect the impact of the Ai.

by subscribed

6/5/2026 at 8:00:31 PM

rewrite the quote for comic relief or use quotes to signify accuracy to the spoken line .[0]

not both , please.

[0]: https://www.cnbc.com/2025/04/29/satya-nadella-says-as-much-a...

by serf

6/5/2026 at 8:22:55 PM

Fair. I added a remark that should make it clear it's not verbatim.

by subscribed

6/5/2026 at 7:40:53 PM

Agentic coding.

by sdevonoes

6/5/2026 at 8:46:07 PM

When will the industry acknowledge that unreviewed vibe coding is not acceptable? The term itself is an offense to common sense. It should not have been given any legitimacy.

I blame the one who coined it -- for having created an entire career based on vibes, namely vibe driving, vibe neural networking, and finally vibe coding -- none of them work.

by OutOfHere

6/5/2026 at 8:59:13 PM

Andrei Karpathy coined it.You can talk to him, but he is probably too busy with the big leagues now.

by lackoftactics

6/5/2026 at 7:38:45 PM

I’d ask how this happens, but I’m afraid the answer would just be more disappointing.

by frays

6/5/2026 at 7:41:36 PM

My bet is AI

by DougN7

6/5/2026 at 7:35:56 PM

They can't even get the title right: "Accidentally deleted subscriptions for chat integrations (Sla..."

Utter degradation.

by cyberax

6/5/2026 at 7:49:04 PM

It's an Atlassian Statuspage style oddity, the title is too long for a single line and it's put an ellipsis and linebreak. But the ellipsis has overwritten the end of the content on the first line. Full title shows on the home page.

by ZoneZealot

6/5/2026 at 7:45:29 PM

That might actually be a bug in Firefox. The source text is correct and it works in Chrome. `text-overflow` shouldn't apply to text that fit on a line...

by chearon

6/5/2026 at 8:25:26 PM

[dead]

by ieie3366

6/5/2026 at 8:37:46 PM

[dead]

by throwaway613746