6/4/2026 at 9:59:25 PM
The FT article has a lack of evidence of an actual operation. It claims Mythos is being used for "offensive cyber operations" in the first paragraph, but doesn't give a source supporting this claim. The lone piece of evidence given says Mythos "would be useful for" infiltrating China or Iran, which is a hypothetical, not evidence of an actual operation.None of that means the NSA isn't doing offensive work, my issue is that FT claims Mythos is involved in active foreign attacks based on a single anonymous source saying it "would be useful."
by tristanj
6/4/2026 at 10:49:02 PM
Right, and zero non-anonymous sources. A person plausibly "close to Anthropic" or vaguely "with knowledge of the situation" using the stock phrase "the best defense is a good offense"... this is not a news article y'all. It's speculation.by _alternator_
6/5/2026 at 11:40:02 PM
Meaning "an LLM related to"by LearnYouALisp
6/4/2026 at 11:09:34 PM
speculation, or marketing.by saidnooneever