alt.hn

6/4/2026 at 8:56:10 AM

Show HN: Uruky (EU-based Kagi alternative) now has Image Search and URL Rewrites

 https://uruky.com/?il=en

by BrunoBernardino

6/4/2026 at 10:14:32 AM

I really like the idea and that it's eu-made a love it. A fee things I see with kagi which are useful and improvements:

- Hire a UI/UX person NOW! My parents and gf like using google and kagi because are easy to use.

- add the widgets like the football or the show the local store with the phone number asap. My gf is thinking about moving away from kagi because of this.

- the quick ai response is extremely useful.

- Indexing websites is super important. People doesnt know where to put the content in a website or how to make accessible. Many times i use google due to this fact.

- Make a family subscription.

- make it funny, easy to use and welcoming. The branding is SUPER important.

Good luck and I really wish you to succeed! Im paying for an account ;)

by evilmonkey19

6/4/2026 at 10:50:11 AM

> Uruky is a private search engine focused on personalization

> - Indexing websites is super important. People doesnt know where to put the content in a website or how to make accessible. Many times i use google due to this fact.

Is there a way to build a search engine that doesn't involve either building or accessing a index somehow? I'm not sure what you're trying to say here, is this for the website builders or for the users, who the "indexing of websites" is super important? The "people doesn't know" part sounds like it's for website authors, but the last part makes it sound like the context is search engine users.

by embedding-shape

6/4/2026 at 1:26:30 PM

I refer to the fact that many websites don't have a proper way to search the content inside the website. For instance, many goverment websites have terrible accessibility and the data seems ofuscated.

Google solves me to search content in those websites

by evilmonkey19

6/4/2026 at 11:19:42 AM

In the FAQ, they mention they don’t have an index, they just collect the results from other search engines.

by Infiniti20

6/4/2026 at 11:20:30 AM

Ok, so say they added their own website index then, how would that help with "People doesnt know where to put the content in a website or how to make accessible"?

by embedding-shape

6/4/2026 at 11:31:57 AM

Uh oh. Where is that? We do have our own index, Uruky Site Search!

by BrunoBernardino

6/4/2026 at 1:09:33 PM

On the settings page it appears that the index is disabled by default and not included in the ordering either. It's a bit confusing here!

by tazard

6/4/2026 at 1:16:51 PM

It’s currently a tiny “indieweb” index, which is why it’s opt-in right now, and not big enough to be in the ordering, yet.

by BrunoBernardino

6/4/2026 at 12:16:41 PM

How do I search the index? How big is it?

I went into settings, excluded every provider, and enabled "include uruky site search", but it still says "Providers used: Mojeek", and every other search I try shows no mention of the uruky index

by KomoD

6/4/2026 at 1:15:48 PM

It’s too small right now, so we don’t allow you to search it exclusively, yet. Eventually it should become a “proper” search provider once it reaches 100M urls or so.

by BrunoBernardino

6/4/2026 at 10:47:16 AM

Thank you for your suggestions and support!

- Ouch. We get a lot of love for our UI/UX, which I guess just goes to show taste is personal. If you have any particular points of friction, we'd love to hear about them.

- Only Serper allows for this, so we're very hesitant. If other providers allowed it, we could definitely consider it.

- We won't have Generative AI, sorry.

- Could you clarify?

- Check out the interview I gave The Privacy Dad, I explain the problems for something like that.

- Roger!

by BrunoBernardino

6/4/2026 at 5:08:47 PM

> We won't have Generative AI, sorry.

You're taking a stance? In this economy?

This is a bug plus in my book, and it is, besides being Europe-based, the reason I've been donating to Vivaldi for the past 18 months. I signed up for Uruky just last week, but I sense I'll stick around for much longer. Please continue being awesome!

by thesdev

6/4/2026 at 11:41:34 AM

Seeing the point on UI/UX got me curious as well and from a brief look I don't quite see where it is coming from, but maybe they will expand on it. Regarding their point about relatives loving Google/Kagi for usability: If you don't already do that, I believe it can be pretty eye-opening to just place some "tech-illiterate" person in front of your product and check if/where they struggle. There were lots of situations where I saw people struggling with steps I stopped thinking about, just because I was more familiar with the software. And while I have nothing to do with UI/UX myself, I am pretty sure that kind of paper cut is what tends to block any kind of broad adoption.

by lowdude

6/4/2026 at 12:02:35 PM

Thanks! Your point is quite valid and we do that. Unfortunately, the biggest problem with most "tech-illiterate" people we have is that they don't understand why they should care about privacy or what's "wrong" with AI tools in the first place.

by BrunoBernardino

6/4/2026 at 1:38:48 PM

I got the point. But in this case, you have a fairly low pricing (5€), therefore i guess either you want a side project, a small business in a familiar kind or to go worldwide adoption. The last case, you have to take "tech illiterate" people really seriously.

by evilmonkey19

6/4/2026 at 10:57:10 AM

Big plus for not doing unrequested AI stuff <3

by wolvoleo

6/4/2026 at 1:35:15 PM

- the landing page looks good to me, but not to my mother for example. A slight difference in color, placing or anything is like a huge problem for her. - im sorry to hear thag. However this is being a deal breaker for my parents and gf :/ they use it A LOT! - many websites have terrible content placing and search features. But im forced to use them. I use google to get to that content.

by evilmonkey19

6/4/2026 at 10:44:50 PM

I think it all depends on what kind of customer they want to attract.

> Hire a UI/UX person NOW

I agree, the current site is too busy.

> add the widgets like the football or the show the local store with the phone number asap

Sounds like clutter to me

> the quick ai response is extremely useful.

Depends, I use Kagi because it doesn't have that (or it does, but allowed me to hide it, I don't remember anymore)

> make it funny, easy to use and welcoming

If I see another web site that "uh-oh!"s me the moment something doesn't work, I'm going to kill myself ;) The drive to be "funny" can very quickly turn into cringe-fest.

by neonstatic

6/5/2026 at 6:20:09 AM

Kagi does have Quick AI response. It's hidden behind a button and will only automatically answer if the search inputs ends with a question mark (?).

by chrisandchris

6/4/2026 at 10:33:02 AM

I live in the EU and I use kagi, but I think you fail to understand why kagi is good and useful. In the end of the day I need a search engine to find stuff and kagi is better than google for the things I and my AI agents are searching for. If you don't get that no amount of better privacy is worth my time as a person as shit searches mean agents don't works so well a.k.a more expensive or my room becomes toastier for the agents that I run locally. (I can use it for boring personal searches, but I do 2/3 of these a day, so I am not paying 5€ for that)

by alex7o

6/4/2026 at 11:42:24 AM

Have you tried Uruky and found it to be lacking? Totally agree with you, but I don't see many people here saying they've had a bad experience with this. (I haven't used it)

by NoboruWataya

6/5/2026 at 10:34:23 AM

To be fully hones no I haven't, but for me to switch I need some proof that I would have good experience. Like sell me on having good experience and I will try your product for a week, have a good experience and I will use your product from now on. But I. Their case most likely not, the thing I use kagi most for is ai agents with kagi search it works insanely well for me.

by alex7o

6/4/2026 at 10:56:49 AM

Agreed. The noise in tech circles often gets founders to conflate ten different things into a product that no longer makes sense. “Eu made alternative to Kagi”? Cool, we need European search engines, sign me up. “Privacy is such a priority we’re looking to accept cash by mail”? Okay, you’re never gonna build a serious competitor, never mind.

by scrollaway

6/4/2026 at 10:59:57 AM

Yeah Mullvad that accept cash in the post are not a serious VPN provider at all, right.

by wolvoleo

6/4/2026 at 6:23:46 PM

You seem to not understand that a search engine and a VPN don't have the same audience, and certainly not the same needs for focus.

It's ok, we all have our flaws.

by scrollaway

6/4/2026 at 7:18:59 PM

They are very comparable from a privacy standpoint IMO. A search engine and a VPN both get quite a lot of insight in your interests and browsing habits because a lot of browsing sessions start with a search.

by wolvoleo

6/4/2026 at 11:02:00 AM

I'd be more than willing to subscribe and support the project BUT, I need to address the elephant in the room: The reason why I'm against Kagi is the fact that they use Yandex(be it only for images according to their own words) and I'm sure as hell refusing to give a single cent to them. So I guess my question is: sources?

by axegon_

6/4/2026 at 11:16:42 AM

> For web search, Uruky currently integrates Mojeek, Marginalia, EUSP (Ecosia/Qwant) (only works with French, German, or English), Linkup, Serper, and Uruky Site Search.

> For image search, Uruky currently integrates Pixabay and Serper (image results).

https://uruky.com/faq

by SockThief

6/4/2026 at 11:31:10 AM

Thank you!

by BrunoBernardino

6/4/2026 at 11:14:44 AM

What's wrong with Yandex? I think every possible criticism of Yandex I can think of could just as easily be leveled at Google or Bing.

by specproc

6/4/2026 at 12:32:26 PM

I also don't use Kagi because of Yandex, and my reason is that it's a Russian company, owned by people close to the Russian government.

by NicuCalcea

6/4/2026 at 1:08:07 PM

Kagi seems unfairly picked on here. Lots of people do business with Russia. Multiple EU countries import gas from Russia which, the UK just dropped sanctions on Russian oil, lots of countries do not have sanctions on Russia at all so buying things from those countries might involve money ending up going to Russia.

On the other hand Kagi is an American company so is at the very least abiding by US sanctions.

by graemep

6/4/2026 at 1:24:12 PM

I'm not claiming it's an infallible system and that no single cent of my money goes to Russia. I just do what's within my powers based on the information I have.

by NicuCalcea

6/4/2026 at 1:30:04 PM

You cannot have an infallible system, but my point is that Kagi keeps getting highlighted, but no-one else seems to.

by graemep

6/4/2026 at 1:45:22 PM

In my circles, Europe's (continuing) dependency on Russian fossil fuels is discussed often and at length. This being a tech forum, it's to be expected that conversations would revolve around tech products like Kagi. Off the top of my head, Russian connections are also brought up in relation to OnlyOffice and Telegram.

But I agree, we should be more vigilant about who and what our money supports.

by NicuCalcea

6/6/2026 at 3:02:41 PM

"I put ukraine flag in my social media profile"

by 627467

6/4/2026 at 5:23:22 PM

It is maybe unconventional in a public discourse but I believe that it is completely fine for an individual human to "discriminate" anything multiple orders of magnitude more powerful, richer and more unaccountable to him/her than a human. For example - a billionaire, a corporation, a country, a block, an alliance, a military or mercenary unit and so on. Just because there are some other baddies around it is totally okay for an individual to boycott one of several selected baddies. Sure, it is a "discrimination" and it's fine. The power imbalance dictates that it is both ethical and logical thing to do.

It is especially logical to "discriminate" corporations which are not corrupt monopolies entwined with corrupt governments. Boycotting FAANG corpos is as pointless as it is impossible. The only reaction one may get from those is dead silence. Boycotting Kagi and publicly shaming them, may make them wake up and correct their misguided ways. For example, after years of nagging and shaming, DuckDuckGo has cut ties with Ruzzians. So that sometimes does work.

by Yizahi

6/4/2026 at 12:57:42 PM

I loathe both Russian and American governments, what's a boy to do?

by specproc

6/4/2026 at 1:04:26 PM

That is a tough position, I don't have a definitive answer. Perhaps you could look at supporting non-US and non-Russian companies building their own search indexes? Not sure what the state of Ecosia and Qwant's European Search Perspective is these days, but that's an option.

by NicuCalcea

6/4/2026 at 3:45:42 PM

Murder and jaywalking.

by TiredOfLife

6/5/2026 at 4:05:13 AM

Why would anyone support US companies when they have been hoarding data for decades? things specially concerning at current state of the country.

by nerdyadventurer

6/5/2026 at 9:59:41 AM

I try to avoid US companies as well when possible, I just avoid Russian ones even more.

by NicuCalcea

6/4/2026 at 2:47:30 PM

Is that better or worse than Google?

by tardedmeme

6/4/2026 at 11:32:10 AM

but surely you realize that people going to kagi also don’t like google or bing.

by _diyar

6/4/2026 at 2:49:56 PM

There's little future in catering to customers who come to you only because they hate Google. They will soon find a reason to hate you and fill up your support forums and Discord with complaints. After all, they are spending the gigantic amount of $10 per month on your service, and have a right to influence the company.

With Uruky, these customers can now move on instead, and the lower price will serve as another reason. And then they also don't have to worry anymore that their accountant is going to call at 3AM and demand that they "justify" the gigantic subscription cost.

And Kagi can focus on the only real selling point they have: Search results quality. Which is where their future lies and what most potential customers are looking to pay for. Not being anti-Google.

by carlosjobim

6/4/2026 at 11:16:21 PM

I think the point was that kagi uses google and bing as it’s search providers, besides others like yandex

by __jonas

6/4/2026 at 11:13:18 AM

What's wrong with Yandex? Is it quality of service being too low? Does the company have tracking records of shady practices, worst than what GAFAM are doing that make customer flee away?

by psychoslave

6/4/2026 at 12:03:47 PM

In my experience, Yandex was feeding in a lot of low quality results into Kagi - lots of pirated software, shady websites, proxy duplicate copycat sites, content that I'll euphemistically call "free speech". Kagi has a domain blacklist feature, but I was starting to fill up my blocklist - I think it's capped at 1000 domains, and many of these sites spin up new domains specifically to get around blocklists.

There's also the geopolitical issues, which I'll skip over because similar concerns can be leveled at other indexes too. I posted about that on the Kagi feedback forums back in 2024:

https://kagifeedback.org/d/4727-option-to-choose-or-exclude-...

I since built my own metasearch engine for my own use, where I choose the external indexes used, and I'm much happier. I started building a personal index of the web as well. I haven't used Kagi or Google for over a year now.

I hope I'm not distracting from Bruno's Uruky project here. Not everyone is technical enough to spin up some PHP code and make their own metasearch, or spin up a VPS and install a SearxNG instance. There's value in providing a good user experience for less technical users, in building resilience by using multiple indexes & building your own, and reducing dependencies on external index APIs that may cut off your access (coffgooglebingcoff). I'm glad services like Uruky exist.

by SyneRyder

6/4/2026 at 9:21:25 PM

Main feature of urky seems to really be privacy. on my own searxNG i would be all the traffic. If I ho through urky hopefully I can hide with traffic from other users.

by gunalx

6/4/2026 at 11:15:03 AM

It's Russian. Indirectly you are supporting Putin when you use it. Those sanctions aren't for no reason.

by wolvoleo

6/4/2026 at 3:47:36 PM

Kagi pays Yandex. So you are supporting directly

by TiredOfLife

6/4/2026 at 7:16:28 PM

Kagi -> Yandex -> Putin (through taxes), it's not really direct IMO

by wolvoleo

6/4/2026 at 9:25:37 PM

Yandex these days is pretty much directly Kremlin, so it's not "through taxes".

That being said Kagi -> Yandex hop does indeed make it indirect.

(I too have stopped using Kagi after I found out that they pay Yandex and employ people who support Russian war).

by neoromantique

6/5/2026 at 11:28:32 PM

Wait what? They employ pro russian employees and use yandex?

by cantalopes

6/6/2026 at 1:22:19 PM

This Reuters article provides some useful context about Yandex: https://www.reuters.com/markets/deals/after-months-negotiati....

Yandex was split for a while into a Russian-controlled part and an independent part in the Netherlands, controlled by the original co-founder, which later become Nebius AI. Nowadays, these entities are completely detached, and Arkady Volozh has renounced his Russian citizenship.

by nirv

6/4/2026 at 11:35:26 AM

Am I indirectly supporting Trump when I use DuckDuckGo?

by chadgpt3

6/4/2026 at 12:42:41 PM

Yes, and a lot of EU citizens/companies are actively in the process of migrating away from US based software/products to EU alternatives for, among others, this exact reason.

by dodslaser

6/4/2026 at 12:36:54 PM

Yes. You're also supporting Bing ads. With a thin veneer of privacy washing goodness, of course.

by woadwarrior01

6/4/2026 at 3:01:08 PM

I'll give you an introduction to Modern European Ethics™:

If you do something in this world and this life - remember you normally have about 70 years - there is always some detail of what you're doing that is worthy of criticism, shunning, and shaming. Since everything in the world is connected, you can't avoid it.

If however you do nothing in your life or with your life, then there is also nothing which you can be criticized for doing. And you can never be criticized for not doing something. When you die after a life toting the line and having the allowed opinion on every subject and shunning people who do things; then you go to European heaven - which is an eternity of committee meetings in Brüssels.

by carlosjobim

6/4/2026 at 7:11:02 PM

It's not really a thing. We all know flying is a really bad thing and still the skies are full of planes also in Europe. It's just an extra factor to take into account. Like, when you can choose another solution that does not have this factor.

It's not about moral superiority, just about awareness of the choices we make. I have several friends that don't do the "Bali" summer holiday thing anymore even though they would like to and can afford it. Because Greece is also fun and wastes a lot of less fuel.

I like this better than the current American approach of: "We know it's bad for the environment so we will do it as much as possible to extract more profit than others before the world becomes uninhabitable. Then we will have WON!"

by wolvoleo

6/4/2026 at 11:20:02 AM

^ Correct!

by axegon_

6/4/2026 at 11:20:03 AM

But is Yandex government owned? What about Russians abroad that send money back home to their families, and a percentage of that ends up going via taxes to Putin? Are we boycotting all Russians everywhere globally?

by sevg

6/4/2026 at 2:05:12 PM

All businesses based in Russia should be boycotted, also second-hand (so businesses that deal with other businesses based in Russia).

If I knew someone was sending money to Russia, I would of course avoid any contact (let alone financial ties) with them.

by distances

6/4/2026 at 3:23:28 PM

> But is Yandex government owned?

In fact, yes. Yandex is totally controlled by Putin's presidential administration.

> What about Russians abroad that send money back home to their families

It doesn't seem like a significant factor. The main flow of money into Russia are payments for fossil fuel and trade balance with China.

by Ray20

6/4/2026 at 11:36:09 AM

Yes, we boycott anyone who supports Putin’s regime.

by tumdum_

6/4/2026 at 11:38:54 AM

Hate to break it to you, but not all Russians support Putin.

by sevg

6/4/2026 at 12:45:00 PM

I think the OP’s point still stands, but it is a fairly weak argument.

I am Russian and I do oppose Putin’s regime. My family is in Russia, though. If I send them money (which), and they pay for, say, groceries, which are taxed, some tiny part of my money will be used to fund the regime and the war. I am very disappointed but there is no way for me to just yank all my family and friends and relocate them to a less fucked-up jurisdiction.

Doing business with Yandex is a whole other beast. Kagi can choose to use a worse search engine API which doesn’t involve paying money to a Russian company. Are there some market forces at hand here? Maybe a lot of Russian expats pay for Kagi because it has good Russian-language results? I don’t know.

Edit:

> But is Yandex government owned?

It isn’t, but I really doubt it has no ties with it. It would be interesting to trace and see if Yandex Cloud’s international branch money gets back to its Russian counterpart, or if they are two separate things.

by notpushkin

6/4/2026 at 12:04:56 PM

[dead]

by develop7

6/4/2026 at 12:47:17 PM

[flagged]

by tumdum_

6/4/2026 at 12:55:13 PM

That is unfortunately just plain racism.

(For the record, I despise what Putin is doing.)

by sevg

6/4/2026 at 12:58:10 PM

[flagged]

by tokai

6/4/2026 at 1:14:17 PM

No, interacting with Russian people does not mean supporting genocide. Please raise the quality of your comments here :)

by sevg

6/4/2026 at 3:46:32 PM

With those in russia and majority of those outside it does.

by TiredOfLife

6/4/2026 at 1:22:40 PM

[flagged]

by tokai

6/4/2026 at 1:32:45 PM

Your stance seems to be that interacting with any Russian means supporting genocide, regardless of if they support Putin. Which is so absurd as to be likely ragebait. So yes, it’s a quality issue :)

And if you’re discriminating against all Russians based on their government, even though not all Russians support Putin, then that is unfortunately just racism.

by sevg

6/4/2026 at 11:22:39 AM

[flagged]

by axegon_

6/4/2026 at 11:35:03 AM

Americans too, or just Russians?

by chadgpt3

6/4/2026 at 11:49:46 AM

[flagged]

by axegon_

6/4/2026 at 11:53:05 AM

I see. To summarize, you believe all Russians are bad because a Russian person killed your friend and all Americans are good because no American people killed any of your friends?

by chadgpt3

6/4/2026 at 12:13:54 PM

Is it really that hard to believe people don't want to support a state that has brutally occupied half of Europe for 50 years and is right now murdering Ukrainians every day?

Russia is waging a hybrid war against Europe (and the West in general), there's no way I'd give one of their biggest tech companies even a cent.

by BYazfVCcq

6/4/2026 at 12:26:38 PM 

  people don't want to support a state that has brutally occupied half of Europe
Sure. The comments above were about Russians though, not the state.

by orphea

6/4/2026 at 12:48:49 PM

States consist of people. Russians are shareholders of Russia.

by aboardRat4

6/4/2026 at 1:02:45 PM

It would be true if Russia was democracy. It is not.

by orphea

6/4/2026 at 1:30:12 PM

It's not a democracy because they neglect their shareholder duties. In other words, they are responsible for not making it a democracy.

by aboardRat4

6/4/2026 at 1:36:48 PM

This is a naive point of view. I can't blame you though, you probably live in a better part of the world.

by orphea

6/4/2026 at 1:46:26 PM

The world also consists of people. Are you saying that people around me are better than the Russians? Sure, nice to have finally agree about something.

But that just proves the point you were trying to argue with.

by aboardRat4

6/4/2026 at 1:50:47 PM

No, you misread. I didn't say people around you are better; I said you probably live in a country with working government institutions and fair elections.

I don't feel you approach this discussion in good faith. I see no point in continuing.

by orphea

6/4/2026 at 2:51:50 PM

[flagged]

by aboardRat4

6/4/2026 at 1:44:22 PM

It is silly to grant agency and moral responsibility exclusively to people living within democracies.

The Putin regime made an informal deal with the population "You stay out of politics and we're gonna stay out of your life". The people outsource political power to the regime.

This passive majority represents the bulk of the population, but not the whole of the population. There are two smaller groups. Ultra-patriots who criticize Putin for not doing more war, more suffering etc. And those who criticize the Putin for the war, although this group is not very vocal, but here I do agree with you that's it's difficult to publicly protest in an authoritarian regime.

by blue_pants

6/4/2026 at 12:02:26 PM

[flagged]

by axegon_

6/4/2026 at 12:15:05 PM

> 0 killed friends (first one dating back to 2009, ironically in the US)

I'm unable to parse this bit, which you say is important. The first of your zero friends was killed in 2009?

by tremon

6/4/2026 at 12:11:25 PM

You can hate ALL Russians all you want but it's not whataboutism to call you out on the hypocritical and hateful position you take. Saying you have issue with not only a country but all it's people and their offerings because of the countries effects on friends and families just means in the case of the US, that you have no friends that are: Black Americans, Native Americans, Latino Americans, pretty much all of South Americans, large portions Africans, the Balkans, Vietnamise, Most of the Arab countries etc?

Surely the rational position to take is to hate the countries policies not all their citizens. I also dislike Russia policies but boycutting or hating the creator of 7 Zip because he is Russian seems weird.

by xquce

6/4/2026 at 11:32:50 AM

Regarding UI/UX. One thing that immediately catches my as an Design Engineer (being over 7 years Product Designer before that) is that the site looks bland. Nothing that sticks. Also one UX caveat: you are using your accent-color for primary buttons like the sign-up as well as a display variant for text for the "PRIVATE SEARCH YOU CONTROL". The logo is not a strong one, lacks personality, the font choice is also a little "weird".

Just my two cents. But I am glad, that someone is creating an alternative in the EU. Hit me up, if you want to get more design opinions.

by sthix

6/4/2026 at 10:16:13 AM

As much as I'd prefer a smaller, non-american operator (for most anything really), I'm extremely hesitant to pay directly for search.

For this service, the "just an ID as account" looks nice and private on the surface, but once you look at payment methods, it's 100% personally identifiable. If it's so privacy-focused - where's the payment option for transferring Monero?

As for the code - don't get me started. Source available? NDAs?

Smells "Private VPN" funny to me.

by my_throwaway23

6/4/2026 at 10:43:52 AM

We're working towards accepting cash by mail in a month or two, and regarding cryptocurrencies, we've been trying to reach out to proxysto.re unsuccessfully for that. If you know of a similar option, we'd love to hear about it!

by BrunoBernardino

6/4/2026 at 1:50:35 PM

Taler could be a good match: it's a digital coin that has been in development for a long time and is currently starting to see real use. It guarantees the anonymity of the buyer but not the merchant (to avoid tax evasion and money laundering). It's not a cryptocurrency (no blockchain, no intrinsic value with floating rate), it's really a digital form of whatever currency your exchange uses.

Now the only working exchange I know is in Switzerland (https://taler-ops.ch/en/). I wonder if you could legally use that from another country... I think GLS Bank is also supposed to have an exchange running in Germany some time this year but there have been delays in the past. Anyway it's probably still a bit early but it could be something to consider.

by sijow

6/5/2026 at 7:39:15 AM

I Would love to see Taler also be adopted.

by expedited123

6/4/2026 at 10:52:58 AM

If the goal truly is privacy, and that's why you're adding cryptocurrency options, then adding a middleman like "proxysto.re" or any other, then you're not giving users the privacy you say you want to give. You really need to handle that on your end, if that's something you want to offer for the purpose of privacy.

Take a look at how Mullvad implemented it, which I guess is where you got the "cash in a letter" method from, they also handle cryptocurrencies by themselves for exactly this reason, there is no way for you to actually be able to fulfill the privacy promise otherwise.

by embedding-shape

6/4/2026 at 1:11:44 PM

Yes, and I’ve talked with Mullvad about it before. The main problem for us is that we cannot exchange XMR for fiat legally, in Portugal, and we have no costs that can be paid with XMR, at the moment.

ProxyStore should work well as a proxy because they receive XMR anonymously and pay us in EUR for an account number. We don’t know who paid for what and don’t care (we also don’t know that after 14 days, Mollie doesn’t know any account number).

by BrunoBernardino

6/4/2026 at 11:46:54 PM

That sounds like may not want to be (legally) based in Portugal.

Aren't there some EU countries that also have tax incentives (Estonia comes to mind) ? Could be wrong

by Melatonic

6/4/2026 at 8:41:58 PM

What is the problem with using a middleman with XMR?

by Phelinofist

6/4/2026 at 11:15:55 AM

Privacy Pass would also be a good option. You can use it with Kagi, where you’ll have cryptographic tokens that you can use for searches without them being linked to your account. Even if you use a non-anonymous payment method, you could still use the service without leaving a trace.

by RandomGerm4n

6/4/2026 at 10:59:29 AM

I have to agree with embedding-shape, don't use a middleman please. Just accept monero payments yourself <3

Once you accept Monero I'll give it a try :)

by wolvoleo

6/4/2026 at 11:05:02 AM

As a search/metasearch developer, I can heavily recommend Uruky. It is by far the best third party search alternative in terms of how they approach privacy and transparency. Keep up the good work Bruno! <3

by asciimoo

6/4/2026 at 11:22:35 AM

Thank you so much, Adam! Hister [1] is also an amazing option for people looking to have their own "local" index! And it's FOSS!

[1] : https://hister.org

by BrunoBernardino

6/4/2026 at 10:09:45 AM

> EU search providers (Marginalia, Mojeek, EUSP, etc.).

Does this mean this is just a meta search engine without its own index?

If so, the comparison to Kagi seems misleading.

The question would turn from "why not Kagi" to "why not SearxNG".

by aniviacat

6/4/2026 at 10:31:29 AM

Kagi is also a meta search engine. The only Kagi-owned index is Teclis, which is very small and really only indexes RSS feeds of small sites. The Kagi API supplements its Teclis results with additional results from Marginalia.

It would be nice to have more search indexes available though, especially via APIs.

I wish Kagi was a search index, back when I was a Kagi subscriber that's what I hoped my funds were going towards building.

by SyneRyder

6/4/2026 at 10:25:58 AM

Kagi is also a metasearch engine, as it combines several third-party indexes.

by freehorse

6/4/2026 at 7:36:17 PM

Comparison with Kagi is making them more harm than good. Only way they are comparable is that both want to charge money for search and there are a few options to personalize search results.

Their UX is really at most a proof of concept, not good enough for daily use.

by mhitza

6/4/2026 at 10:41:16 AM

Good question! We also have Uruky Site Search, our own index, which is quite tiny at the moment, but we hope to grow, eventually. Kagi's own index is Teclis, which is one of their smaller providers as well.

by BrunoBernardino

6/4/2026 at 11:00:07 AM

If you are building out your own index, might you consider offering it as an API via pre-paid credits (ala Mojeek, Kagi Teclis?)

I'm only paying Mojeek about $10 - $20 per year in API for my personal metasearch, so I guess this is a terrible market to enter ;) But I'd genuinely be interested, especially if the money is going towards building an index.

by SyneRyder

6/4/2026 at 11:28:01 AM

Uruky does exactly that (it has an API and any searches fund the search providers directly). If you want to _exclusively_ use Uruky Site Search (our index), though, that'd be impossible as it's too small to be used as an exclusive provider. Probably in the future that'll be possible, though.

I'd recommend you look into any of our other search providers if you just want the API search!

by BrunoBernardino

6/4/2026 at 10:57:39 AM

Sounds good, thanks for the clarification.

by aniviacat

6/4/2026 at 12:08:34 PM

> EU servers, EU storage, EU payment processing, EU search providers (Marginalia, Mojeek, EUSP, etc.).

> All servers and data are physically in the EU. All search providers are based in the EU. Payment processing is done in the EU.

Mojeek and Serper aren't EU so that's just false. And I'm not sure all the providers only use EU servers so I don't like the claim for that reason too.

> Try in: Google // DuckDuckGo // Ecosia

I would remove this, I thought it was for changing what provider I was using, but no, it just sent me to Google.

Then at the bottom of the page is where I found this, which I would prefer to have at the top.

> Try with: Mojeek // EUSP // Linkup // Serper

by KomoD

6/4/2026 at 2:28:38 PM

Dang. You’re right that Mojeek is UK, so Europe but not EU (at the moment, at least). I’ll need to add a remark for that. We already do it for Serper.

Regarding the servers, our servers and data are in the EU. We can’t guarantee that for our providers, but they don’t access your data.

As for Try in/Try with, good point, we can add a preference for swapping them.

by BrunoBernardino

6/4/2026 at 10:00:49 AM

It is a bit hard to evaluate the potential when you need to top up and do a captcha just for evaluation purposes. The barrier of entry is quite high.

by ainiriand

6/4/2026 at 10:05:16 AM

To be clear, you don't need to top up (only click the link or try a search) _and_ do the captcha. You can _either_ top up for a month, _or_ do the proof-of-work captcha (should just be clicking a checkbox and giving it a few seconds).

The reason for the higher barrier of entry is bots/abuse. Up until a few weeks ago we didn't even have the captcha option. Without any kind of identification, it's impossible to prevent automated/bot signups, and they can abuse the system to oblivion.

I understand that's not ideal, though I hope it still makes sense!

by BrunoBernardino

6/4/2026 at 10:11:38 AM

You may want to clarify that in your FAQ, which states this in the very first entry:

> Unfortunately, due to the fact it's too costly to properly avoid bots and other automated tools from abusing our service, we don't offer a free trial.

by aniviacat

6/4/2026 at 10:40:19 AM

Argh, stale docs! Thanks for the notice, I'll push that fix in the next update later today (currently in the middle of adding an optional date filter).

by BrunoBernardino

6/4/2026 at 10:08:17 AM

I'm not making a freaking account before I can even run a single search.

by iLoveOncall

6/4/2026 at 10:11:56 AM

As far as I can tell, Kagi also requires you to create an account before you can try it out. You can of course disagree with that practice, but it is not like Uruky is requiring something far out of the ordinary.

by Munksgaard

6/4/2026 at 10:39:19 AM

To create an account you only need to click a link (so the account number can be randomly generated for you), not provide any information. I understand if that's not good enough for you, though.

by BrunoBernardino

6/4/2026 at 10:35:40 AM

[dead]

by inquirerGeneral

6/4/2026 at 2:47:15 PM

Given that:

- Google has been around for 20+ years, so the concept of search engine and the technologies behind it should have been well known.

- Computing power and Internet speed has increased significantly and in many homes (at least outside of US) 1Gbps is norm.

- Everyone is talking about Google deteriorating over the years and prefer the old Google. The old system from the 2000s should be dirt cheap to run with modern home hardware.

- People's need for search engine is highly specific, you presumably would be interested in searching a small subset of the whole Internet.

My question is: why haven't a local run search engine be a thing at least in the tech circles?

It should be able to bootstrap with e.g. an hourly updated "top 100 websites in 50 categories" index file, and adapt to my daily queries to automatically update the index in the background, and iteratively improves the quality of the results.

The rise of the local LLM users proves this model works.

by yegle

6/4/2026 at 2:55:58 PM

You should check out hister.org!

by BrunoBernardino

6/4/2026 at 3:03:08 PM

Oh it checked multiple boxes I have in mind, and the website UI is really great. I'll definitely give it a try.

by yegle

6/4/2026 at 2:57:27 PM

kagi exists for quite some time

by randomtoast

6/4/2026 at 3:00:14 PM

I was talking about a self-hosted search engine.

by yegle

6/4/2026 at 7:12:47 PM

Could you consider Delayed Open Source Publication (DOSP) [1]? With that, you make the source code open-source after a specific period of time (such as 5 years).

This way, your customers still get the source code and can use it freely, but you don't have to worry about competition. By the time anyone could use it to compete with you, they would be using an ancient version of your software. The BUSL (Business Source License) by MariaDB is a battle-tested license designed for exactly this use case.

[1]: https://opensource.org/delayed-open-source-publication

by maxloh

6/4/2026 at 7:28:24 PM

That is an option, for sure, but it feels less honest to our customers to give them the code "so much later". With the PolyForm Shield, they can just use the _current_ version however they want for themselves/family, as long as they're not competing with us commercially. Or am I missing something else, here?

by BrunoBernardino

6/5/2026 at 6:26:42 AM

Not really. That means you give your customers the code to use under your current restrictions, and after a specific period, they can use it under the open-source license of your choice as well.

by maxloh

6/5/2026 at 8:42:24 AM

I see. We'll look into considering doing both, then. PolyForm Shield for the current code, with BUSL to transition into AGPLv3 after 2 or 3 years. Do you think that would work well?

by BrunoBernardino

6/6/2026 at 5:32:28 AM

Yeah. That would be great!

by maxloh

6/4/2026 at 11:17:51 AM

I think it could help to maybe allow 10 searches free (without logging in) just for someone to see what the UI is like or show an example of the results page. It adds a bit of friction for someone to have to make an account and pay just to test the product.

Kagi lets you test it offline (go incognito and try) " Kagi Search is funded by members, not advertisers: built to find what you need, not sell your attention.

Try 50 free searches, and if you love it, sign up for 100 more before choosing a plan. Searches used "

by sarjann

6/4/2026 at 11:30:27 AM

Thanks for the suggestion! That would mean we'd have to count searches, which we don't want to do. With the 2h free trial via proof-of-work captcha it should allow you for much more than that! I know the FAQ for that is outdated! I'll update it later today with a new date filter.

by BrunoBernardino

6/4/2026 at 5:39:05 PM

Hi. A have a user report, after visiting the site it automatically switched to a language based on my system locale, but not on my UI language or keyboard preference. So it is possible to visit the site from some guest PC for example where locale would be something unfamiliar. And the language selector is down at the very bottom (I guarantee that my mom for example would never find it) it is plain text and it is in the currently set language. So for example if I will get a page set to Chinese or Korean or Hindi, I wouldn't even understand where language selector is, it would be a set of glyphs unrecognizable to me. Or vice versa, let's say an Indian person would get a cyrillic text.

I suggest moving language selector to the header of the page and adding some icons to it - flags or English encodings (EN/DE/CN/RU/IN): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ISO_639_language_codes

by Yizahi

6/4/2026 at 6:41:52 PM

Thanks for reporting this. Do you happen to know what your browser sends in the `Accept-Language` header?

by BrunoBernardino

6/5/2026 at 12:03:59 PM

I think this is what is sent from my side:

"name": "Accept-Language", "value": "en-US,uk-UA;q=0.9,uk;q=0.8,en;q=0.7"

"name": "User-Agent", "value": "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:151.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/151.0"

by Yizahi

6/6/2026 at 8:50:01 AM

Thanks, I've pushed a fix for this!

by BrunoBernardino

6/4/2026 at 2:16:19 PM

Nice - I like this. Especially that I can also use it via API too and that expectations are limits are set out clearly (which seem very generous).

On limits - consider changing the short limit on this:

> searches to 1 per second, 30 per minute, and 1800 per hour.

to 5 per 5 seconds or 10/10. That still works out to one per second but users are less likely to accidentally hit it with two requests that have similar timing. Say one from me and one from API usage.

by Havoc

6/4/2026 at 2:23:11 PM

Good point. We have never had any reports of customers legitimately hitting these, but we can probably loosen them up a bit.

by BrunoBernardino

6/4/2026 at 2:37:48 PM

Yeah can't picture the average user getting anywhere near the 2nd and 3rd limit. They seem very high to me, but the short one I can definitely picture hitting easily under API scenarios.

e.g. Suppose you have 3 subagents getting triggered that all want to do a search.

>can probably loosen them up a bit.

Definitely wouldn't move the top 2. That would just be hard to walk back later

by Havoc

6/4/2026 at 11:59:27 PM

I see this has already been updated in the FAQ . Thanks!

by Havoc

6/4/2026 at 11:52:13 PM

Have you considered pivoting or prioritizing different test markets or niches?

For example someone brought up making your UI and whatnot easier to use for someones "grandparents". What if you included a "grandpa" mode (you dont need to call it that specifically) that simplies everything and makes it super straight forward to use. I can see technically inclined people buying a subscription for their aging families to help them avoid clicking on useless (or dangerous) crap.

You could also do something similar to Kagi SmallWeb but specifically for EU based stuff.

Currently the UI is not bad but for some reason throws off my BS filter. I think it might be the spacing and (maybe) lines between the results - it sort of makes it resemble the paid text ads inserted into Google Search?

by Melatonic

6/4/2026 at 10:53:56 AM

I think this is excellent so that Kagi can focus on making the best search engine instead of trying to please the angriest and most difficult customers.

by carlosjobim

6/4/2026 at 1:30:18 PM

Interesting. I will definitely add it to my list of services to experiment with.

I like the account/payment system, where you top up a random account number for a period. Instead of having to go with the whole process of creating and verifying an account with your data and then managing yet another recurring subscription.

Congrats on the release, wish you the best.

by dethos

6/4/2026 at 1:42:55 PM

Thank you! Please reach out if you have any suggestions or run into any trouble!

by BrunoBernardino

6/4/2026 at 2:57:59 PM

Please don't try to machine translate to my local language. The translations are terrible or outright incorrect.

by ent

6/4/2026 at 3:16:07 PM

Thanks for reporting this. We’ve used a professional translator for German (though we’ve added many new phrases that haven’t gone through that process since), and we speak Spanish and French (besides English and Portuguese). We use DeepL for the rest but it’s not perfect. What’s your language, and do you know of a professional to help us? If you’d rather reach out to us via email, it also works.

by BrunoBernardino

6/4/2026 at 11:35:00 AM

Honestly didn't notice Kagi was US-domiciled. Their meetups I think are typically in Europe and their co-working and office space is in Belgrade.

Anyway, Kagi's excellent, their search results for me are significantly better than Google (and customizable), they've leveraged AI in a way thats optional and, to me, class-leading in its ability to help with search. "But we're EU based" is a product strategy that might land you some local government contracts and a few customers whose key motivation is negative emotion towards others but it's never going to be the path to great success. Spotify didn't conquer the globe because they framed themselves as an anti-US anti-iMusic or anti-Pandora or whatever alternative. They conquered because their product was solid. Nobody cared where it's HQ was.

by mrngld

6/4/2026 at 1:03:00 PM

It seems clear to me that a company that pushes being EU-based and minimising US dependencies as a selling point doesn't really want to "conquer the globe". As a consumer it is even less important to me. Indeed, if your search provider has conquered the globe, then it's probably time to find a new one because the next logical step is turn the screws on users to maximise profits.

by NoboruWataya

6/4/2026 at 1:48:40 PM

Great point! In our comparison page with Kagi it should become clearer that’s not our only product differentiator. If you’re happy with Kagi, that’s great, it’s a very good product! We don’t want world domination. :)

by BrunoBernardino

6/4/2026 at 9:49:51 AM

Interesting! All the license stuff aside, there's definitely a desire for more EU-first services like this.

by Munksgaard

6/4/2026 at 11:11:11 AM

Do you have Privacy Pass or some other type of privacy-preserving credentials functinoality?

by dizhn

6/4/2026 at 11:42:14 AM

Can you expand on the benefits of that when there is no personal information (not even an email or payment ID after 14 days) associated with an account?

by BrunoBernardino

6/5/2026 at 3:41:02 AM

It would be super cool if you chose 20-100 queries (both common and niche) and shown the sample search results for those.

Those would be completely cached/pre-rendered, so the cost would be very low and there will be no potential for abuse. And yet the visitors could at least get some idea about the quality of your search engine.

by theamk

6/4/2026 at 7:29:54 PM

Happy customer here. Found you last month while looking for searxng and related alternatives for API search with clankers in a personal setting.

by frangonf

6/4/2026 at 7:32:46 PM

Thank you for supporting us!

by BrunoBernardino

6/4/2026 at 8:42:57 PM

I've just cancelled Kagi. While it was great. I'm trying to stop supporting US companies unless they provide good value

by prism56

6/5/2026 at 6:40:18 PM

This intrigued me and I topped up an account. Is there no password? Anyone could "steal" my account number and kick me out?

by plextoria

6/6/2026 at 6:19:33 AM

There is no password, just like Mullvad. You should "protect" your account number like you would a password, but also, you can just discard it and change to another one in a month, for example.

by BrunoBernardino

6/5/2026 at 7:09:47 AM

Solid EU-first positioning — the "trust local infrastructure" angle is increasingly important here. Curious about the privacy model: Kagi famously refuses to log queries. What's your approach to search history retention?

by dukisamardzic

6/5/2026 at 8:38:17 AM

No logging or tracking as well.

by BrunoBernardino

6/4/2026 at 9:52:15 AM

Does Uruky provide an API, or allow API usage such a way that I can leverage it as part of an agent workflow, or otherwise, in place of something like DuckDuckGo?

by danielrmay

6/4/2026 at 9:55:48 AM

Yes, we do offer an API and are transparent about the rate limits (no search limits) in the FAQ.

by BrunoBernardino

6/4/2026 at 1:42:44 PM

Okay, so in order to do a test search, I have to:

1) type in a query and hit enter because there's no search button.

2) click signup, even though I want to evaluate it before creating an account.

3) apparently now I'm signed up without having to enter any details - what's the point? Just create a new session as soon as I initiate the search.

4) so now I need to return to the homepage to trigger another search.

5) search again, enter again. Now I'm greeted by a captcha.

6) after solving the captcha, I now have to enter my search query a third time because it wasn't saved

7) search results!

Guys.

by AndroTux

6/4/2026 at 7:24:03 PM

The goal was to always show you the account number before you went for anything, but your post made me realize you don't need that if you're just trying it out, so now you should only:

1) type in a query and hit enter

2) solve the captcha

3) search results!

by BrunoBernardino

6/4/2026 at 9:06:35 PM

Much better. Now just add a freaking search button. That's literally your primary function, and you're lacking the button to do the one thing.

I understand as a power user you don't press on buttons, but from a UX perspective, if you don't trigger the search immediately upon typing, you need a button to start the search.

Your current UI suggests: Type in a query, and then click on "images" because that's the next thing that you can click.

(Also apparently my IP is now banned and now every page just reads "Forbidden," so I couldn't even buy your product if I tried. You really should invest a lot in UX if you want this to be a product that's used by anyone other than hardcore privacy nerds.)

by AndroTux

6/5/2026 at 1:14:51 AM

Nice project! It lacks two things that are very useful : website blocking, and !hashbangs like DDG.

by manytimesaway

6/5/2026 at 8:45:06 AM

I'm not sure if this is trolling, but we offer both. Even custom bangs, and you can also use Kagi's Bangs: https://github.com/kagisearch/bangs

by BrunoBernardino

6/5/2026 at 1:57:47 PM

This was not trolling at all, I didn't see these features on the website. Amazing, thanks for the quick response!

by manytimesaway

6/4/2026 at 10:12:32 AM

I think that, more than EU metasearch engines, we need EU search indexes. EUSP is already something, but they seem to be working rather slowly, compared to how quickly Brave built their own index.

It's also trivial to run a perfectly working metasearch engine with the same sources as Uruky, it's called Searxng.

In any case, good luck on this project. I personally don't think it's for me. Maybe a better user interface would change the equation, but as of now I'll stick to Qwant.

by danielspace23

6/4/2026 at 10:38:19 AM

Yes! Uruky Site Search is our own EU-based index and we'd love to expand it, but that takes an enormous amount of resources (which we don't yet have).

Besides EUSP we also allow you to choose and use Mojeek and Marginalia, two other big EU-based indexes, and by using Uruky with them, you're supporting them financially, directly.

by BrunoBernardino

6/4/2026 at 10:46:10 AM

Suggested name: Memory hole.

by carlosjobim

6/4/2026 at 11:06:28 AM

I read in your FAQ that you don't support bitcoin payments yet. Might I suggest you have a look at https://www.lightspark.com/capabilities/embedded-finance ?

They make it easy to be compliant with local laws and integrate payment features.

by janandonly

6/4/2026 at 11:25:33 AM

Thanks! We're currently trying to get in touch with proxysto.re for that. Light Spark seems based in the US, so we can't consider them, I'm afraid.

by BrunoBernardino

6/4/2026 at 11:28:07 AM

Why do you need to involve a third party to implement bitcoin payments?

by chadgpt3

6/4/2026 at 2:31:07 PM

Not for bitcoin, but for monero, which is more requested than bitcoin.

by BrunoBernardino

6/4/2026 at 10:50:07 PM

Kagi's only office/hub is in Belgrade, which may not be EU, but it's (literally) close enough. Employees are remote.

Freediver (founder) is US based and Kagi is an US entity, so must comply with any warrants there.

But I guess they could set up a Serbian subsidiary?

by senko

6/4/2026 at 11:01:24 AM

It doesn't do great on recent events it seems. The amusement park Walibi Belgium recently announced a company called RMC is doing a makeover of their wooden roller coaster, so I did a search for "walibi belgium rmc", and it found one very out-of-date article about earlier rumours, and a bunch of less relevant stuff.

by bigblind

6/4/2026 at 11:23:55 AM

Thanks! I'm currently in the middle of building a date filter I expect to launch later today.

Still, was this using Mojeek or EUSP? Have you tried Linkup or Serper for those kinds of searches? You don't have to change your default search providers, you can just choose one from the bottom of the results list.

by BrunoBernardino

6/4/2026 at 2:28:27 PM

Wait do I have to choose what search provider I use for every search? They don't get merged by Uruky?

by lolc

6/4/2026 at 2:33:02 PM

Only if they don’t provide enough results. We initially queried them all and merged, but that became too costly and inefficient (too many duplicates most times). It should be explained in the FAQ.

by BrunoBernardino

6/5/2026 at 7:32:17 AM

Consider adding favicons near the websites in search results. Way easier to distinguish them at a glance.

---

Also: The EUSP index is surprisingly good, by the way. Bingish level from my experience...

by expedited123

6/4/2026 at 3:51:38 PM

One of the things I like about Mullvad is that I can buy a voucher on Amazon, and use that to pay for the service with a high degree of anonymity. Is/will something like that be possible with Uruky?

by dtj1123

6/4/2026 at 4:39:11 PM

I’m not aware of this, can you clarify? Technically anyone can top up an account on Uruky and give it away to someone else.

by BrunoBernardino

6/4/2026 at 7:01:44 PM

Like so, hopefully the link works for you:

https://amzn.eu/d/00yFWx41

The card arrives with a little lottery-ticket style scratchpad with I believe a 16 digit activation code underneath.

by dtj1123

6/4/2026 at 7:26:06 PM

Thanks, I see. You're still giving Amazon and Mullvad your payment information, so unless you're purchasing it for someone else, I'm failing to see the advantage? Again, that's something you can already do with Uruky as well.

by BrunoBernardino

6/4/2026 at 8:44:20 PM

The advantage is that it makes it impossible for Mullvad or Amazon to associate my online payment with the activation code on the card, and by extension my Mullvad account.

by dtj1123

6/4/2026 at 7:12:37 PM

you can even mail cash in an envelope!

"Just put your cash and payment token (randomly generated on our website) in an envelope and send it to us. We accept the following currencies: EUR, USD, GBP, SEK, NOK, CHF, CAD, AUD, NZD."

by john_strinlai

6/4/2026 at 12:45:16 PM

Have you considered adding Google’s SERP to your indexes (via some third-party provider)?

Google’s index is by far the largest, and my impression is that a search engine is hardly useful unless it includes Google’s results.

by Hackbraten

6/4/2026 at 1:44:28 PM

Thanks! Serper is UK-based and does that. We provide them as an option, but not by default.

by BrunoBernardino

6/4/2026 at 11:47:50 AM

Country filters for Luxembourg and Monaco, no country filter for Ireland?

by Kudos

6/4/2026 at 3:17:13 PM

Oops! Sorry about that. I’ll add it later today.

by BrunoBernardino

6/5/2026 at 2:57:16 AM

Tried searching its name uruky on Uruky, some NSFW results shows up which I did not expected...

by iqandjoke

6/4/2026 at 10:25:54 AM

I hate to say this, but those recent EU alternative counteroffers for popular products bare some really unfortunate names....

by cromka

6/4/2026 at 10:32:16 AM

From our FAQ:

> The name has no special meaning but we read it like "Euro-key" in English. Names are hard, and we're aware it can remind people of Uruk and Uruk-hai. That's OK.

I completely understand your point, though. It's not "Google"!

by BrunoBernardino

6/4/2026 at 11:18:19 AM

"Google", for french speaking people, looks like "Gogol" which means "stupid" or "retarded".

by _ache_

6/4/2026 at 12:58:06 PM

Does Uruky pay Yandex like Kagi does?

It's relevant to those of us boycotting Russian products and influence due to the Ukraine war.

by s_dev

6/4/2026 at 1:08:32 PM

The search providers we use are listed in our FAQ and all are Europe-based. Yandex is not included.

by BrunoBernardino

6/4/2026 at 11:13:18 AM

It's a cool search engine. I agreee that need improve in UI/UX. If UI/UX is great. I will consider to use it.

by Alex_toani

6/4/2026 at 11:24:28 AM

Thanks, if you have any specific points of friction, please let us know (an email is perfectly fine)!

by BrunoBernardino

6/5/2026 at 7:07:50 PM

Do you pronounce it like uruk hai?

by kreyenborgi

6/6/2026 at 6:20:02 AM

It's in the FAQ, we pronounce it like "Euro-key" in English.

by BrunoBernardino

6/4/2026 at 10:07:48 PM

My number one request: let me block specific sites from my search results.

by mietek

6/5/2026 at 8:46:39 AM

`-site:domain.tld` works for "non-permanent blocking", but in your settings you can add domains or TLDs to block from the search results.

by BrunoBernardino

6/4/2026 at 10:55:51 AM

Interesting. Being EU-based is a huge plus over Kagi in my opinion.

I also like that they don't ask any personal data, even email address. I like services that don't want any personal details. Like with Mullvad, where they just give you a random number and that's your account ID <3 Unfortunately Mullvad enshittified in other ways so I had to move to ProtonVPN. But services that act like that are great IMO. Unfortunately a lot of services apply "Know your Customer" BS even though they are not in the financial sector.

However I wonder where they get their search data from. But it's worth investigating.

by wolvoleo

6/4/2026 at 11:17:50 AM

It should be clear in the FAQ. All Europe-based. Our current search providers:

- Mojeek - EUSP - Marginalia - Linkup - Serper (the only non-EU, being UK and proxying Google) - Uruky Site Search (our own index) - Pixabay (images)

I'd be curious to hear about your Mullvad experience (feel free to email me).

by BrunoBernardino

6/4/2026 at 11:24:55 AM

Well Mullvad stopped providing port forwarding, which is necessary for good torrent support (especially if you use public torrents and you need ones that aren't seeded a lot).

They also stopped supporting openvpn which I need. Wireguard only now.

It's not enshittification in terms of ads etc but it is reduction of possibilities because they already make enough money on the people using the main features.

But anyway I rely on both things so I moved over.

by wolvoleo

6/4/2026 at 11:51:42 AM

What's the reason you need OpenVPN?

by KomoD

6/4/2026 at 7:22:39 PM

I use a hardware router with really nice encryption offloading that does not support wireguard but does support openvpn natively.

This router is in front of my 'arrrrr' subnet at home, where all my leeching servers live. This way sidechannel attacks don't work because they have no alternative path to the internet.

It's a nice setup and I have no wish to change it or to buy other hardware.

by wolvoleo

6/4/2026 at 7:05:40 PM

mullvad stopped providing port forwarding due to the abuse and the effects a single-digit percent of their users was having on the other 90+% of users.

not because they "already make enough money on the people using the main features" or "enshittification".

its kind of like the opposite of enshittification, actually, seeing how it made the service better for the majority of their users.

by john_strinlai

6/4/2026 at 7:20:49 PM

Maybe the term is wrong but I really disliked this move. They should just have taken more active measures to combat abuse, which is something all providers have to deal with.

One example: They could have done port forwarding just on UDP. Which would still have allowed torrents (the main usecase for port forwarding) but blocked any kind of webhosting via VPN.

But for me the service got distinctly shittier so for me I think this term qualifies.

by wolvoleo

6/4/2026 at 1:30:51 PM

Can I (and how to) use it as a search engine for Open WebUI?

by blfr

6/4/2026 at 7:34:22 PM

I don't know what that is and it seems like some AI dashboard. Uruky has an API so as long as you keep within the rate limits, you should be fine!

by BrunoBernardino

6/4/2026 at 7:16:04 PM

I just tried to do a search and it immediately asks me to create an account???

I'm just not seeing the connect here I understand you are trying to fight spam/abuse but seems like a tough uphill battle especially when VPNs solve the privacy issue entirely.

I'm also not sure why this obsession with EU is so prevalent and misguided. EU is privacy regulated, not a guarantee of privacy. GDPR is better than what many places have, but hosting in UE doesn’t magically mean the data is safe, it doesnt mean 0 knowledge encryption, no insider access, no breaches, no subpoenas, no natsec carveouts, or uniformly enforced across borders.

by zuzululu

6/4/2026 at 7:30:47 PM

"Create an account" is simply generating a random account number, but I _just_ pushed a fix to make that "auto-happen" for you if you try to simply search — you'll be presented with an option to solve a captcha or pay for access, then get redirected back to the search after that.

The "EU obsession" for us is mostly about trying to buy and stimulate "the local economy" as much as possible, but YMMV and you're right it doesn't mean any of those things.

by BrunoBernardino

6/4/2026 at 10:22:51 AM

I will pay for search once Kagi or Brave accepts Monero and offers a reasonable price. Can I pay for Uruky with Monero? If you're worried about regulations consider reaching out to proxysto.re

by Cider9986

6/4/2026 at 11:18:28 AM

Thanks! I have reached out over a week ago to them via email and Signal, to crickets. Let me know if you know why or how to reach them, or alternatives.

by BrunoBernardino

6/4/2026 at 7:41:18 PM

Hmm, they responded to me on Signal quickly at one point so unsure.

by Cider9986

6/4/2026 at 7:13:53 PM

> You can use the f=json search query parameter to get JSON-formatted search results, as per the FAQ entry above.

Nice so EU-based company with API available for my agent to use. Right now I am using lightpanda but this my be simpler. I will check it out. Thanks.

by npodbielski

6/4/2026 at 9:27:07 PM

As a European-first kinda person, I think we're good with Kagi?

by Marciplan

6/6/2026 at 6:21:50 AM

Kagi is a great product if you're happy with them! Uruky is for people who want ad-free, private, and personalized search, and no AI, while stimulating the European economy. That's not everyone and that's fine!

by BrunoBernardino

6/4/2026 at 9:08:57 PM

uhm, I'm suddenly completed locked out?

Can't even get to the homepage in private browse anymore so must be IP level. Just says "Forbidden".

Must have tripped some sort of safeguard while trying to figure out how to use the API via curl

by Havoc

6/4/2026 at 9:56:16 PM

OK this is a bit ridiculous. The FAQ does not specify how to use the API beyond listing a json parameter. If you send a curl command with that parameter the first search just returns "Logged In", and run another search and then you're temporarily IP banned site wide.

Having hair trigger sensitive security around API while not telling the user what the request should look like to not trigger that is just silly.

by Havoc

6/4/2026 at 10:26:58 PM

OK bit more trial and error later I worked out a curl command that doesn't trip this.

https://pastebin.com/BNRBfYFf

Still not entirely sure what about the original request trigger it. Think it was something around the Sec-Fetch-* headers that copying a request from browser via copy cURL included

by Havoc

6/5/2026 at 8:48:11 AM

Sorry! You can use the incognito token (from the incognito URL) in order to not have to send the cookie over. If you were trying too aggressively to search, you could've been rate-limited for a few minutes.

by BrunoBernardino

6/5/2026 at 12:00:19 PM

Good to know about the incognito toke - helpful.

Yes, I saw the 3 auth try mentioned in the faq after this, that must have been what I was hitting with the experimenting. Anyway all good now

by Havoc

6/4/2026 at 12:24:47 PM

Yavos - Yet Another Vibe-cOded Service :)

by localhoster

6/5/2026 at 3:38:30 AM

login gated with a paywall of 5 dollars, could not use the product.

by nutifafa