6/3/2026 at 1:46:44 AM
Huh, I didn't know how much I needed a "todo" type until now. So often I'll be defining a packet sumtype, or a collection, and not have created the type yet, so just use ubyte, or Object, or whatever. Having an explicit "todo" type would be amazing in other languages.by Defletter
6/3/2026 at 1:49:56 AM
Scala has had a function called ??? which fills the same role and it’s really useful.by adamdecaf
6/3/2026 at 2:38:53 PM
Rust has the todo!() macro but no todo type. I use todo! constantly and would probably make heavy use of a todo type as well...by packetlost
6/3/2026 at 5:53:00 PM
Todo type in rust will be a never type. Eg thing which exit or panic returnsby 0xdeafbeef