6/2/2026 at 5:25:22 PM
This from the party of "no interference with business".It's obviously a means to take control of AI, because the security argument fails Bigly after the firing of top security experts in the government (who might have the "wrong" views" )
Something about free speech being free for me but not for you?
by k310
6/2/2026 at 5:27:31 PM
Do you think AI should be unregulated?by andsoitis
6/2/2026 at 5:43:36 PM
Yes, if we're talking about running LLMs. It's just math.by nradov
6/2/2026 at 5:34:40 PM
If AI is going to be regulated those regulations should be debated in public and based upon the resulting laws passed by the legislative process and not determined by royal decree.by tssva
6/2/2026 at 5:39:19 PM
The previous administration did same: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_14110So if we’re going to be rational about it, I think it is better to critique the substance of the EO rather than its mere existence, which is common practice: https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/statistics/data/executive-or...
So in that spirit, what do you think of the substance?
by andsoitis