alt.hn

6/1/2026 at 10:56:52 AM

Why _Am_ I Interested in Your Company?

 https://jjmojojjmojo.github.io/why-am-i-interested-in-your-company.html

by jjmojojjmojo

6/1/2026 at 5:24:22 PM

From a hiring side, he seems to be missing context that any of those answers are fine, since they show he at least read the job description. The point is probably show you have the barest clue what job you are applying for, since a surprising number of applicants will say something nonsense like “I want to work on embedded because I’m great at JavaScript and certified with Microsoft Word” and then not actually be able to name a difference between running on a microcontroller and AWS. I’d want to know if you can learn the work, but also that you won’t flee for greener pastures and more interesting problems after investing in training, once you do learn what the tasks are

by manwe150

6/1/2026 at 9:52:46 PM

Many times I have seen people's answers to this question be a factor in which projects they are targeted for by the way. Not every question is necessarily a 'filter' per se. That said I think in truth a lot of this genre of questions fulfill a similar kind of purpose to the 'waiter rule' of dating. Anybody who can't spin together 30s of polite smalltalk about how they're interested in the role to get a job may be very difficult to work with.

by recursivecaveat

6/1/2026 at 3:56:21 PM 

   But one thing I never did was put up arbitrary barriers.  Yet, "top companies" (sorry bro, your pre-seed startup might be a great idea, but it's not a top anything yet) want a show of meaningless effort as a proof of value. And job seekers will comply because we need employment to access capital, or more specifically, food, shelter, health care and social mobility. It's pretty bleak.
It's very simple. The author might want to work for a big company because of money, reputation, office politics, big scale of projects, nice office, good networking and stability. Those companies have a ton of people applying for them for the same reason. Of course they can afford and need to put up barriers. Author think they are arbitrary but would not be able to create better ones to replace them, everyone is in the same boat.

And then the Author weirdly dismisses startups that are looking for talents. Startups that have no reputation, no stability, focused projects, small teams and less money. But they have much less "arbitrary" barriers. Here you go, you have your solution right there in front of you, in your text. Working at a startup or any small company will give you "food, shelter, health care and social mobility". But that's not what you really want. You don't really know why your interested in that big company instead of smaller ones. That question wasn't arbitrary after all.

You can't have a cake and eat it too.

by ttoinou

6/1/2026 at 6:33:59 PM

Im on the hiring side, and I can tell you that these questions are there to serve one purpose only - to give the candidate a chance to stand out.

We were getting some 30-40 applications a day when we were at peak search, and when you get so many, after a few weeks, you start looking for anomalies, show me some glint of greatness, a spark of wit, evidence of original thought, something to show youre not just pasting slop or ticking boxes.

The candidate on the other side of this might say "but theres so many applications to do, I cant do that for every one" and maybe thats the crux, the candidate who puts in the extra effort to stand out will win, and thats the purpose of these questions.

by malux85