5/14/2026 at 6:01:34 AM
> There’s also a silver lining to the tight memory envelope: Apple has to keep macOS running well within 8GB, which is actually a nice forcing function against bloat and inefficiency. We could all use a little more of that.Love this
by jorisw
5/14/2026 at 6:20:21 AM
Eight gigabytes is orders of magnitude more than an OS could ever use, or even the pre-installed software. It's web browsers and the software that uses them that occupy all the RAM, and those are usually made by third parties.Open a few news web pages, and run Discord, Slack, VS Code, etc, and you'll quickly run out of RAM.
by dlcarrier
5/14/2026 at 6:42:36 AM
Ironically these are all text-based applications where the actual content on screen is in the order of a few hundred bytes. They've managed to reach a bloat factor of one million.by HPsquared
5/14/2026 at 6:54:16 AM
Tragicby Affric
5/14/2026 at 7:28:41 AM
If you decry bloated web apps and use Chrome on their Mac... there's Safari. It's far more efficient and has a far snappier UI.by nwienert
5/14/2026 at 7:47:18 AM
There's also Epiphany web browser for cross-platform desktop support and the Fulguris browser for Android.It is noticeably faster, but Chrome is the new Internet Explorer in more ways than one, and many web pages don't work in WebKit browsers.
by dlcarrier
5/14/2026 at 8:33:16 AM
Posts like this makes me feel like I’m using a different World Wide Web than everybody else. Where are all these pages that don’t work in WebKit browsers?I use Safari as my main browser, I open Chrome only when I encounter a web site that doesn’t work in Safari. It happens maybe once or twice per year, and half of the time, it turns out that it doesn’t work in Chrome either.
by Oreb
5/14/2026 at 8:02:02 AM
Chrome is the most advanced browsers on each platform. For example I have hundreds of tabs And chrome is the best at saving up RAM in the backgrounsby ttoinou
5/14/2026 at 8:18:27 AM
It's just closing the older tabs and re-rendering them from cache, when returned to. WebKit does the same thing.by dlcarrier
5/14/2026 at 6:48:45 AM
Apple is no stranger to using a web browser for basic OS functionality. Several pages in the settings app are actually WebKit, source: https://blog.jim-nielsen.com/2022/inspecting-web-views-in-ma...by ben-schaaf
5/14/2026 at 7:25:59 AM
That reminds me of Microsoft's Active Desktop in Windows 98, when the desktop had widgets that were web pages and would show webpage-related errors when something went wrong. We've really gone full circle over the last three decades.by dlcarrier
5/14/2026 at 7:28:43 AM
It's not so much "full circle" as we never came up with a better way to render general purpose rich text content than html/css to begin withby throwaway27448
5/14/2026 at 7:43:51 AM
It's not really using it for much text, though. It's mostly buttons and controls, which GDI, QuickDraw, and Motif did much better back then and newer toolkits like GTK, Tk, wxWidgets, DWM, Cocoa, etc are great at today.by dlcarrier
5/14/2026 at 7:27:34 AM
Web browsers come preinstalled and come embedded throughout the os.But, webkit is much better than chrome in memory usage. If only we could force slack and vs code to use the engine better suited for the job.
by throwaway27448
5/14/2026 at 6:27:50 AM
I occasionally port software I make to MacOS, while mainly being a Linux user, and I settled on a base model, 8 GB M2 Mac Mini for this as well. If it's zippy there, it'll be zippy on the larger models.On the PC/Linux side I keep an old thermally-constrained i5 Sony Vaio ultrabook with a lowly 4 GB from 2015 around for the same reason.
The main dev box is a Ryzen 9950X3D/128 GB monster, so it's a bit of a difference :)
by sho_hn
5/14/2026 at 7:01:22 AM
Meanwhile GitHub tab in Firefox/Chrome eats 6GB RAM alone.by nicce
5/14/2026 at 8:26:53 AM
GitHub, GitHub…where else have I seen that name recently?by DANmode
5/14/2026 at 7:33:23 AM
because they decided that running elasticsearch on your machine is a great idea!by himata4113