5/2/2026 at 8:52:32 PM
I found this really hard to read due to the Claude-isms. "Classic" chicken and egg problem? 39 em-dashes, random numbered lists, etc.If you're not going to even bother to take the time to write an article, why should I waste my time reading it?
by procone
5/2/2026 at 9:42:59 PM
Started reading, saw "That was it, That was the whole reason", closed the page.by Jtarii
5/3/2026 at 12:47:30 AM
Is that a claudeism? IMO that's a perfectly natural trope that'd be at home in my voice or any of a million generic blog people I've read since long before AI. It is a linguistic trope, sure, but that's an unrelated criticism.by RickS
5/3/2026 at 12:58:39 AM
The thing with all AI-isms is that they all started humans, but we're apparently not allowed to use them anymore. Emily Dickinson obsessed with em-dashes, now they belong to ChatGPT.by Sparkle-san
5/3/2026 at 5:54:34 AM
I’ve never read comments, articles, books in LLM’s current style before LLMs, and somehow, since then, I read comments like these every other day. This phenomenon is way overblown at the minimum. And since nobody showed a counter example from before 2022 which can be confused as LLM generated (using em dashes was never in it self that) I tend to say that it never even existed.by ruszki
5/3/2026 at 3:29:19 AM
You can use em dashes as long as you don't write like a bot.by slopinthebag
5/3/2026 at 10:42:17 AM
There is just a very specific kind of enthusiastic/authoritative/nerd voice that claude and other LLMs do does that is so grating to me. Like it's trying to be super upbeat and engaging and it comes off as trying too hard and is just offputting. If people are going to use LLMs to write their articles for them I would rather they be more neutral in tone, it just feels so incincere to get a robot to try to impersonate a enthusiastic human.by Jtarii
5/3/2026 at 3:28:56 AM
It's more subtle than that. Human written articles are immediately recognisable and so you let your guard down and tropes like this are accepted. But AI writing occupies a part of the uncanny valley where the hairs on the back of your neck stand up a bit, and every AI-ism like this is like a branch snapping beneath your feetby slopinthebag
5/2/2026 at 8:59:34 PM
I read it and found it useful\_(^ ^)_/
by hmcamp
5/2/2026 at 9:08:30 PM
I mainly object to AI writing when it’s excessively verbose. This was pretty information dense, a few AI-isms didn’t make it a waste of my time to read.by 542458
5/2/2026 at 10:42:26 PM
I've begun to find the writing style nauseating regardless of use, but yes, at least it isn't used to pad length.by pityJuke
5/3/2026 at 3:18:41 PM
pretty obviously a copy-and-paste jobby Throaway199999
5/2/2026 at 9:34:34 PM
Welcome to Hell, Reader.(I liked the article, personally.)
by debo_
5/3/2026 at 1:28:37 AM
Yeah, I saw an oddly placed rule-of-three and closed the tab.This website is going downhill, almost every blog post I open is just blatantly AI generated these days. It's like people don't have any self-awareness anymore, they just lazily prompt their AI to generate a post and then pat themselves on the back lol.
by slopinthebag
5/2/2026 at 10:48:31 PM
"How a Broken Bike Sync Led Me to Reverse Engineering My Wahoo's Hidden Debug Mode" - this is brain-dead AI slop right in the title.by akomtu