alt.hn

4/16/2026 at 3:08:33 PM

Spiral staircase with a single guardrail once led to the top of the Eiffel Tower

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/a-dizzying-spiral-staircase-with-a-single-guardrail-once-led-to-the-top-of-the-eiffel-tower-now-you-can-buy-14-of-the-original-steps-180988535/

by bookofjoe

4/19/2026 at 8:26:24 AM

That site is everything that's wrong with the internet at the moment.

A dizzying array of adverts and popups.

by ianpurton

4/19/2026 at 2:12:09 PM

Using UblockOrigin, in default deny all javascript mode, the article is fully readable with zero adverts and zero popups.

I had no idea the article even contained any of those until I read your comment.

by pwg

4/20/2026 at 7:36:42 AM

Does that block all js from running?

by chromadon

4/19/2026 at 9:28:13 AM

And it was very persistent In should enable those. No thank you.

by consp

4/19/2026 at 9:48:54 AM

Not a single popup, didn't find any ads more than a text-only banner on top asking to subscribe. Some whitespace where ads might go though. No adblock.

I'm in EU though, maybe they actually respect GDPR. Or maybe it is just a glitch.

by tjoff

4/19/2026 at 2:43:12 PM

I wonder how the plumbing worked for the bathroom in his private office at the top of the tower.

by alehlopeh

4/19/2026 at 6:05:00 PM

I also wonder how practical it was to climb there, I went to the eiffel tower several times and climbing stairs is an exercice by itself ,especially spiral ones

by allan_s

4/19/2026 at 3:50:20 AM

All spiral staircases have a single guardrail. That’s why they aren’t double helix staircases.

by sneak

4/19/2026 at 7:14:39 AM

> with no safety barriers

A guardrail isn't a safety barrier? The photos of the staircase don't look like star wars walkways to me at all.

by nottorp

4/19/2026 at 6:52:51 AM

We call them “spiral staircases” yet rarely do they actually contain a single spiral - but they do have a helix. I guess “helical staircase” was just too much for people to care about as the term embedded in the 1600s. Previously they’d been winding stairs, screw stairs, and earlier yet just a “vice”, so common were they. Weird how language adapts to what’s easy rather than what’s correct.

by madaxe_again

4/19/2026 at 11:08:23 AM

> Weird how language adapts to what’s easy rather than what’s correct.

It’s not weird at all, it’s quite sensible. The purpose of language between people is not to produce correct sounds, it’s to facilitate some other activity or intent, so people will tend towards whatever manner of language makes achieving their goals the easiest.

It’s the same reason desire paths form: it’s less effort.

by nkrisc

4/19/2026 at 9:40:24 AM

If some language conveys meaning successfully, it ultimately doesn’t matter what the rules are.

by cheschire

4/19/2026 at 11:10:41 AM

The old prescriptive vs descriptive linguistic battle rears its head once again.

by technothrasher

4/19/2026 at 7:43:52 PM

The only languages that don't change are ones that no one uses anymore.

by nkrisc

4/19/2026 at 4:08:09 AM

Ahhh.... I couldn't figure out why they said that. I forgot the Statue of Liberty had double-helix staircases.

by MithrilTuxedo

4/19/2026 at 7:58:20 AM

As seen in "The Lavender Hill Mob"

by Andrew2565

4/19/2026 at 11:37:29 AM

Wasn't the Eiffel Tower built as a temporary exhibition?

Can't believe the resources that took for 'temporary', and that it lasted this long.

by FrustratedMonky

4/19/2026 at 5:54:25 PM

That's part of what makes it impressive. "Our country is so advanced and powerful that we can make a giant tower like this just for a glorified art show"

by pimlottc

4/19/2026 at 1:17:20 PM

>Eiffel’s contract dictated that the structure would stay up for only 20 years.

by bookofjoe

4/19/2026 at 1:46:47 PM

I kind of feel like in the old days, people weren’t really afraid of heights. Heights were fairly new, and exciting, and the consequences of falling were not well understood yet. It’s why you would see skyscraper construction workers jumping around and sitting on beams to enjoy a casual lunch thousands of feet up, without a care in the world.

by deadbabe

4/19/2026 at 2:42:18 PM

> Heights were fairly new, and exciting, and the consequences of falling were not well understood yet.

Indeed. Until Herbert Fall wrote his treatise about it in 1902 the entire concept was really absent from our collective imagination.

by fulafel

4/19/2026 at 2:15:33 PM

I'm pretty sure people have been falling off things for a quite a while.

by tvier

4/19/2026 at 2:38:51 PM

…the consequences of falling were not well understood yet

Eh? Cliffs, trees; fall off anything at 10 meters or higher, and your odds of dying are around 50%. I’m pretty sure folks were aware of the consequences long before Eiffel showed up.

by mikestew

4/19/2026 at 4:15:40 PM

A guy literally jumped off the Eiffel Tower to test an early parachute, ignorant of what would happen if it failed.

by deadbabe

4/19/2026 at 6:30:04 PM

The fact he was testing a parachute would suggest he was well aware of the consequences.

by davepdotorg

4/19/2026 at 5:51:38 PM

Perhaps it was more that risk taking and dying young from various illnesses was a thing that happened around you a lot, so you were more accustomed to it and didn't expect to live to 80.

by yencabulator

4/19/2026 at 7:47:27 PM

...ignorant of what would happen if it failed.

Then why was he testing a parachute in the first place? I think he had a better idea than you give him credit for.

by mikestew

4/20/2026 at 12:24:37 AM

[dead]

by qotgalaxy

4/19/2026 at 4:39:43 AM

Look, I know ads are the mechanism for some sites. And I don’t normally “this site gave my phone cancer”.. but on IOS with blockers, everything except the text on the site can go fuck itself.

Been to the top of the Eiffel, it was a long enough set of elevator rides to flirt with and eventually date a French girl. So that probably wouldn’t have happened on stairs.

by SV_BubbleTime

4/19/2026 at 6:52:12 AM

FWIW, on android with firefox + ublock origin it's clean from ads.

On iOS with firefox it's filled with ads; with firefox focus it's mostly clean but you get a dismissable "please disable adblocker" style prompt I didn't get on android. I don't know if there's a browser with a good adblocker allowed in iOS walled garden, but I'd be happy for suggestions

by procaryote

4/19/2026 at 6:27:24 AM

Do you think you might have also broken up if it had only been stairs?

by aaronbrethorst

4/19/2026 at 2:00:26 PM

[dead]

by onetokeoverthe

4/19/2026 at 3:12:10 PM

Well, that certainly wouldn't have overwhelmed my fear of heights. /s

I'd probably physically lock up in a state of panic. My SO had to rescue me on a far less severe stairway last year when I freaked out at a third story height that was kind of open. Imagine what this could do to someone with vertigo.

by alsetmusic

4/19/2026 at 12:03:04 PM

[dead]

by aaron695