4/5/2026 at 8:27:59 PM
Possibly not the best choice of name...?(Edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Performance_Monitor in case people are unaware, usually known as... perfmon)
by gertrunde
4/5/2026 at 2:16:28 PM
by paperplaneflyr
4/5/2026 at 8:27:59 PM
Possibly not the best choice of name...?(Edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Performance_Monitor in case people are unaware, usually known as... perfmon)
by gertrunde
4/5/2026 at 5:34:55 PM
I was using tmux to consolidate TUI monitors in both tabs and panes. What's the advantage of perfmon?by jackhab
4/5/2026 at 6:49:02 PM
Wow, looks great. Just a quick general recommendations:You should give a direct curl to an install.sh to provide a simpler installation step for you tool and besides I think it would be good to publish it on home brew for MacOS users.
This post came in a good moment because I am developing a CLI and I want to add some interactivity to it in the next major version and in some way your CLI has helped me with that.
This is my CLI (https://github.com/elC0mpa/aws-doctor)
There you can check how I implemented the home brew distribution and the install.sh file for the easy installation step
by elC0mpa
4/5/2026 at 4:20:12 PM
Looks pretty good, but would love to know this compares to bottom (btm), featurewise. Thanks!by PeterWhittaker
4/5/2026 at 5:17:36 PM
Perfmon essentially allows you to define commands you use daily, defined them in a toml file and tab them, ie customizable. It could be docker or kubernetes commands and so on. This is different from btm.Bottom(btm) gives just more graphical than top.
by paperplaneflyr
4/5/2026 at 4:35:15 PM
Ha, I've literally never heard of bottom, and haven't looked it up yet, but it's just kind of funny doing Linux/Unix forever and knowing almost exactly what it must be about, just given the name. I'll edit this if I was wrong, but I bet I won't be.by jrm4
4/5/2026 at 2:16:28 PM
[dead]by paperplaneflyr