alt.hn

4/3/2026 at 4:57:09 PM

Go on Embedded Systems and WebAssembly

https://tinygo.org/

by uticus

4/3/2026 at 6:21:02 PM

Tinygo made a lot of progress over the years -- e.g. they've recently introduced macOS support!

It does indeed produce much smaller binaries, including for macOS.

  yuriy@MacBookAir ~/t/tinygo> time tinygo build -o test-tiny main.go
  
  ________________________________________________________
  Executed in    1.06 secs    fish           external
     usr time    1.18 secs    0.31 millis    1.18 secs
     sys time    0.18 secs    1.50 millis    0.18 secs
  
  yuriy@MacBookAir ~/t/tinygo> time go build -o test-normal main.go
  
  ________________________________________________________
  Executed in   75.79 millis    fish           external
     usr time   64.06 millis    0.41 millis   63.64 millis
     sys time   96.76 millis    1.75 millis   95.01 millis
  
  yuriy@MacBookAir ~/t/tinygo> ll
  total 5096
  -rw-r--r--@ 1 yuriy  staff    74B  3 Apr 19:17 main.go
  -rwxr-xr-x@ 1 yuriy  staff   2.3M  3 Apr 19:18 test-normal*
  -rwxr-xr-x@ 1 yuriy  staff   192K  3 Apr 19:18 test-tiny*
  yuriy@MacBookAir ~/t/tinygo> cat main.go
  package main
  
  import "fmt"
  
  func main() {
          fmt.Printf("Hello world!\n")
  }

by nasretdinov

4/4/2026 at 4:12:31 PM

What does it look like if you pass -ldflags=“-s -w”?

by maccard

4/4/2026 at 10:28:11 PM

With Go v1.26.1

  package main
  import "fmt"
  func main() {
    fmt.Printf("Hello World!\n")
  }
Binary sizes:

• 2581616B (2.5MB) → 1714560B (1.6MB) (with -ldflags="-s -w")

• 1531920B (1.5MB) → 753680B (0.7MB) (with upx --force-macos)

That said, a trivial “Hello World!” isn’t a meaningful benchmark. If you’re going to play that game, you might as well swap `fmt.Printf` for `fmt.Println`, or even `println` to avoid the import statement entirely. At that point, you’re no longer comparing anything interesting, the binaries end up roughly the same size anyway.

by guessmyname

4/5/2026 at 1:33:32 PM

I find it quite interesting that import of "fmt" package alone leads to a 2+ MiB binary :). But, to be fair, TinyGo doesn't seem to treat "fmt.Printf" function any differently from others, so it does compile the same source code as the regular Go compiler and just has better escape analysis, dead code elimination, etc.

by nasretdinov

4/4/2026 at 1:41:04 PM

TinyGo was instrumental in getting https://github.com/rcarmo/go-rdp to work. It generates very tight, pretty high performing WASM, and that allowed me to push all the RDP decoding to the browser side while making sure I had a sane test suite. Heartily recommended.

by rcarmo

4/3/2026 at 7:01:11 PM

We're using TinyGo and the Wazero runtime for our WASM plugin system in ServiceRadar, highly recommend both if you're using golang.

by carverauto

4/3/2026 at 7:37:45 PM

Yay wazero maintainer here, thanks for the shout-out!

by evacchi

4/3/2026 at 9:12:39 PM

It was good to meet at wasm.io!

by pancsta

4/5/2026 at 6:50:12 AM

Definitely don't recommend that since it works when it does and doesn't otherwise. Most users will not end up happy trying to make it work since the alternative is more common.

This isn't a fault of TinyGo itself, it is just targeting a space that doesn't really prioritize embedded but got picked up for that just because. But without fixing this Wasm ecosystem issue, compiling Go to Wasm will never be a real thing.

https://github.com/WebAssembly/gc/issues/59

by pjjpo

4/3/2026 at 7:46:08 PM

Wazero is awesome. For anyone wanting to embed in languages other than Go, check out Extism.

by apitman

4/3/2026 at 9:04:10 PM

TinyGo doesnt have networking in WASI[0] and the WASM websocket module[1] was last updated 5 years ago. Go without stdlib is not Go.

[0] https://github.com/tinygo-org/tinygo/issues/4880

[1] https://github.com/Nerzal/tinywebsocket

by pancsta

4/4/2026 at 8:00:54 AM

Interestingly enough for the C and C++ folks, compiler specific dialects for embedded without standard library, are still argued for as if being C and C++.

by pjmlp

4/4/2026 at 3:26:31 AM

For embedded systems, see https://github.com/tinygo-org/net

For WASI, check out WASI Preview 2, https://docs.wasmtime.dev/api/wasmtime_wasi/p2/index.html

by dkegel

4/4/2026 at 5:59:24 PM

Thats the host, but the guess is missing, as stated in the issue last year "I guess we could add sockets to wasip2". To be honest, even BigGo failed me on websocket conns on both wasmtime and wazero (connects and gets into an inf loop on reply). WebWorkers and GOOS=js work like a charm tho on BigGo in FF/chrome.

by pancsta

4/4/2026 at 8:58:42 PM

Yeah, I suspect sockets in wasip2, and wasip2 in general, are just now having the bugs shaken out of them.

The company I work for is just now upgrading its edge WASI support to wasip2.

by dkegel

4/3/2026 at 10:54:54 PM

Could we compile tailscale with tinygo to run it on openwrt? Last time I checked tailscale was too large for 8MB flash routers

by jackhalford

4/4/2026 at 2:16:56 AM

Lot of stdlib, especially net, crypto, in tinygo doesn't compile, or if compiles has stubs as implementation that panics with not implemented. Few years ago, I tried compiling small terminal http client app and failed at compile stage.

https://tinygo.org/docs/reference/lang-support/stdlib/

by mayama

4/3/2026 at 6:48:05 PM

Writing embedded code with an async-aware programming language is wonderful (see Rust's embassy), but wonder how competitive this is when you need to push large quantities of data through a micro controller, I presume this is not suitable for real-time stuff?

by tatjam

4/3/2026 at 6:55:28 PM

You can disable GC in tinygo, so if you allocate all the necessary buffers beforehand it can have good performance with real-time characteristics. If you _need_ dynamic memory allocation then no, because you need GC it can't provide realtime guarantees.

by nasretdinov

4/3/2026 at 9:07:38 PM

Doesn't seem like those should be mutually exclusive, though the habits involved are quite opposing and I can definitely believe they're uncommon.

E.g. GC doesn't need to be precise. You could reserve CPU budget for GC, and only use that much at a time before yielding control. As long as you still free enough to not OOM, you're fine.

by Groxx

4/3/2026 at 7:34:04 PM

I've written a fair amount of code for EmbeddedGo. Garbage Collector is not an issue if you avoid heap allocations in your main loop. But if you're CPU bound a goroutine might block others from running for quite some time. If your platform supports async preemption, you might be able to patch the goroutine scheduler with realtime capabilities.

by clktmr

4/3/2026 at 7:55:06 PM

Can you elaborate on this and how it would be different from signaling on interrupts and DMA?

Hardware-level async makes sense to me. I can scope it. I can read the data sheet.

Software async in contrast seems difficult to characterize and reason about so I've been intimidated.

by randusername

4/4/2026 at 9:27:53 AM

It's really not so different! In embassy, DMA transfers and interrupts become things that you can .await on, the process is basically:

  * The software starts a transaction, or triggers some event (like putting data in the fifo)
  * The software task yields
  * When the "fifo empty" interrupt or "dma transfer done interrupt" occurs, it wakes the task to resume
  * the software task checks if it is done, and either reloads/restarts if there's more to do, or returns "done"
It's really not different than event driven state machines you would have written before, it's just "in-band" of the language now, and async/await gives you syntax to do it.

Even if you don't know Rust, I'd suggest poking around at some of the examples here:

https://github.com/embassy-rs/embassy/tree/main/examples

And if you want, look into the code behind it.

by jamesmunns

4/5/2026 at 10:20:24 AM

Precisely, I would say embassy is a satisfying middle-point between "baremetal" firmware and running something like FreeRTOS / NuttX that hides the event loop from you.

by tatjam

4/4/2026 at 11:46:18 AM

Its a fantastic project, but seems almost inactive now. I have a tiny PR pending for weeks, even reviewed, but not merged. I have another patch I have not submitted as I want to first navigate the earlier PR to completion. Both were bugs that bit me, and I ended up wasting quite a lot of time trying to find it:

1. go:embed supports "all:<pattern" while tinygo silently ignore it. I ripped my hair out trying to figure out why my files were not showing up in embedfs. PR pending.

2. go allows setting some global vars at the build cli (think build version/tag etc). In the code, one can define a default, and then the value provided (if any) on the cli can override it at build time. Tinygo fails to override the value at build-time, silently, if a default value is provided for the var in code. This PR I have not submitted yet, as its more intrusive.

I hope it picks up steam again soon. I love using go for embedded and CF worker use and tinygo makes both of these use cases much more viable than regular go. Honestly, I hope tinygo can be rolled over into the main go toolchain as "target arch".

by ghoul2

4/4/2026 at 5:45:07 PM

Looking at the commit history, it seems pretty active:

https://github.com/tinygo-org/tinygo/commits/dev/

Maybe the opposite thing is happening, whereby the maintainers are getting overwhelmed?

by justinclift

4/4/2026 at 6:08:26 PM

It'd be nice to get some help :) TinyGo developers are community driven as we receive no financing.

by soypat

4/4/2026 at 9:04:12 PM

FWIW the company I work for has been helping out a little here and there, one of our engineers has four commits in so far this year.

by dkegel

4/4/2026 at 5:45:16 PM

There have been four committers in the last week, so it's active!

Consider joining the slack channel #tinygo-dev on gophers.slack.com and pinging them about the PR.

by dkegel