alt.hn

4/3/2026 at 12:21:56 PM

Ubuntu now has higher system hardware requirements than Windows 11

 https://documentation.ubuntu.com/release-notes/26.04/

by bundie

4/3/2026 at 1:04:56 PM

Some are higher, some are lower.

Windows, https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/windows-11-specifica...

1 gigahertz (GHz) or faster with 2 or more cores, 4 gigabytes RAM, 64 GB or larger storage device, UEFI, Secure Boot capable, (TPM) version 2.0, Windows 11 Pro for personal use and Windows 11 Home require internet connectivity and a Microsoft account during initial device setup.

Ubuntu, this link, https://documentation.ubuntu.com/release-notes/26.04/

2 GHz dual-core processor or better, a minimum of 6GB RAM and 25 GB of free hard drive space. For ISO-based installs, you will need a USB port or DVD drive for the installation media. An internet connection is ... not required for the initial installation.

No requirement listed for UEFI, TPM, or account with a company that the Human Rights Council and others describe as aiding and abetting atrocity crimes.

by eesmith

4/3/2026 at 5:57:03 PM

I can't imagine that Windows 11 would be usable with a 2 core 1GHz processor and 4GB of ram. It might install, but opening the start menu alone will fill up your memory (slightly hyperbole)

by nope1000

4/3/2026 at 3:49:02 PM

"Enterprise Linux 10" based distros by comparison cut out support for a lot of what they consider legacy hardware in current versions. Namely CPU must support x86-64-v3 which means AVX/AVX2 capable CPU only, whereas Windows (Server 2025) is supported, probably FreeBSD as well.

by winstonwinston

4/5/2026 at 3:29:05 AM

This is the first time it occurred to me Xubuntu and Kubuntu might be somehow unofficial. I'm not plugged into the Ubuntu community, so figured the flavors were offered by Canonical.

Why is the server version so supposedly demanding if you can install it without X/Wayland? Or can't you?

by jbaber

4/5/2026 at 3:31:54 AM

For instance, I installed Xubuntu on an ancient laptop (reluctantly ensured it was 64-bit, but that's it) recently and everything's fine.

I wasn't told by the installer to watch out or have apt choke or anything.

by jbaber

4/5/2026 at 11:39:32 AM

One of the goals of Ubuntu has always been to make you feel like you are using windows. Seems like it achieved this in terms of resource usage:)

by ozgurds

4/3/2026 at 3:28:50 PM

Do the servers really require 1.5gb? I've always enjoyed using super cheap instances with just 0.5gb of RAM at places like Vultr. I guess the new version won't handle those chores.

RAM is expensive. Didn't they get the memo/invoice?

by xhkkffbf

4/3/2026 at 3:53:55 PM

Very likely, from experience package manager like dnf consumes about 1GB of memory just to fetch package metadata.

by winstonwinston

4/3/2026 at 6:41:26 PM

The dnf autorefresh service bit me running a small Alma instance for the first time.

Debian and apt seemed to require less RAM then, but that was a few years ago now.

by doubled112

4/3/2026 at 5:47:10 PM

Ubuntu Desktop has always been amongst the most consuming distros due to their reliance on GNOME

Even during the time when they didn't and it used Unity, it still was "bloated" in a way

by 79a6ed87