4/3/2026 at 2:25:56 AM
by Jimmc414
4/6/2026 at 9:21:40 AM
Oh. I thought they were going to use AI to create an artificial Steve Jobs.Never mind.
by My_Name
4/6/2026 at 9:14:05 AM
Hey Claude, rename all these jobs to include AI so that WSJ can write an article about AI creating new jobs.by Flavius
4/6/2026 at 9:41:20 AM
https://archive.is/v9rnUby thunderbong
4/6/2026 at 9:29:19 AM
I'm suddenly wondering if it's acceptable to post RT articles here too.by deaux
4/6/2026 at 9:00:03 AM
They missed the Iranians employed into bombing OpenAI's datacenter in Abu Dhabi, at least going by Iran's latest press release. [1] I think that should count as AI-related work.[1] https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/insight/iran-s-irgc-threatens...
by paganel
4/3/2026 at 5:34:45 AM
I'm actually going to tap the sign, here, whichever mod 2nd-chanced this (reposted) — this fluffpiece is a few fiscal quarters late for any attempt at moraleboost (read the room: Oracle's recent 30k axe; <http://www.layoffs.fyi>; obliteration of translation/transcription industries). We are tired, ridden, put away wet.----
I have been saying this since first using GPT-2, years ago, then with only a few tokens at a time (mostly to responses of laughter):
genAI will soon make at least one of two things necessary (&/or):
1) the necessity for some minimal Universal Basic Income
2) the necessity for many young men to die in pointle$$ war$ of di$traction
History, rhyming...
----
Please don't resuscitate this tone-deaf WSB article for thrice.
by ProllyInfamous
4/6/2026 at 9:25:28 AM
Well, #2 is something that historically has regularly been required by the powers that be, so the addition of #1 as another option is actually an improvement.by My_Name
4/6/2026 at 2:15:41 PM
I'm hopeful that if things get bad enough Option #1 becomes the preferred reality. Not holding my breath (for here in america)...by ProllyInfamous