3/31/2026 at 11:24:48 PM
by rpst
4/1/2026 at 12:38:27 PM
How much of this was written using / by Claude? Not hating or snarking, BTW, just curious.Why (especially if the answer above is 'yes' / 'most') do we collectively think Anthropic built such a heavy interface?
by eszed
4/1/2026 at 1:01:02 PM
all of it, and I think the answer is 1. feature creep 2. a lot of nice-to-haves. the TUI alone is responsible for a lot of bloatby rpst
4/2/2026 at 1:54:56 AM
Even that TUI is written in React.by WaterRun
4/1/2026 at 4:13:50 PM
Claude code written for basic on your Apple II, because it'd be so retro.by kylex-ken
4/1/2026 at 4:32:51 PM
I'd love to see itby rpst
4/1/2026 at 9:34:50 AM
I'd say websearch and webfetch tools are very important but missing here. Great direction though, I also wonder about how much bloat could be eliminated...by 0xa2
4/1/2026 at 12:59:41 PM
agree, I was more focused on bloat than pure utilityby rpst
4/1/2026 at 2:42:19 PM
That sure is a lot of lines to avoid using getopts...by malicka
4/2/2026 at 9:18:39 AM
There seems to be only one possible option, --resume, and only one line is dedicated to handling it...by sudahtigabulan
4/1/2026 at 8:01:20 AM
ok this is actually impressive, really. idk why no one commented yetby theidioticdev
4/1/2026 at 11:32:10 AM
I am now waiting for, Claude Code rewritten in assembly project :)(Maybe it can be a good project for anyone who works low-level)
by Imustaskforhelp
4/1/2026 at 12:59:17 PM
we’re going to have a bunch of CC rewritten in <obscure language>by rpst
4/1/2026 at 2:50:36 PM
Waiting for Rust.by kridsdale1
4/1/2026 at 2:52:36 PM
Claw-code (reached 100k stars on github and I have made an article about them[0]) are currently re-writing claude-code in rust (they have already ported it to python)Its worth following: https://github.com/instructkr/claw-code
[0]: my article: https://smileplease.mataroa.blog/blog/claw-code-reaches-100k...
by Imustaskforhelp
4/2/2026 at 1:40:53 AM
[dead]by MarcelinoGMX3C
4/2/2026 at 12:59:57 AM
[dead]by agenexus