3/31/2026 at 6:07:36 PM
Everyday a new low. I shouldnt be surprised, but i cant believe someone could be so self serving and selfish.by frogperson
3/31/2026 at 3:45:22 PM
by grvbck
3/31/2026 at 6:07:36 PM
Everyday a new low. I shouldnt be surprised, but i cant believe someone could be so self serving and selfish.by frogperson
3/31/2026 at 3:48:14 PM
It's an issue! As someone who's worked on science policy for decades, including time in the Beltway, you cannot develop a robust and world-leading science policy strategy with technologists alone!by 2020science
3/31/2026 at 3:57:56 PM
I would say still better than reality TV stars and ignorant podcasters.by ivell
3/31/2026 at 5:01:47 PM
Musk not being there is a huge success.by lostlogin
3/31/2026 at 5:44:08 PM
Which means no cure for my mind virus. I guess ill have to fall back to steak and raw milk then.by throwawayqqq11
3/31/2026 at 3:57:40 PM
...and you can with a single technologist?by karmakaze
3/31/2026 at 5:08:34 PM
Perhaps you don't understand peon. The technologist is there to take orders and execute. You thought you were being given input/a voice at the table? God, no. That's above your station. Now go on, shoo. Let the monied people talk. We'll call you when we need something done.by salawat
3/31/2026 at 5:34:01 PM
This feels like regulatory capture by the tech industry. Academic research needs representation as well.by danbrooks
3/31/2026 at 8:11:08 PM
We should insist on the proper name, "oligarchs", perhaps with the adjective "Trump crony".by bediger4000
3/31/2026 at 6:30:24 PM
Not that it matters much, pretty sure Trump is inadvisable.by ticulatedspline
3/31/2026 at 4:33:45 PM
I bet we see some incredible vaccines released in the near future. We'll be sending patients to cure their cancer regularly on Mars.by brewcejener
3/31/2026 at 5:08:53 PM
One way trip of course.by alphawhisky
3/31/2026 at 4:33:37 PM
Big f'ing surprise.by bmitc