alt.hn

3/17/2026 at 9:53:53 AM

Kagi Small Web

 https://kagi.com/smallweb/

by trueduke

3/17/2026 at 2:23:26 PM

I'm a Kagi search/assistant user and advocate but the "small web" product is a frustrating misnomer.

To me the small web is any little website that was created to be interesting rather than to sell me something. That includes stuff like neocities, "shrine" type sites, single purpose sites, fandom portals, web experiments, etc.

Unfortunately Kagi's definition of "small web" is: blog or webcomic. You must have an RSS feed and it must have recent posts. That rules out so much interesting stuff I don't understand the point.

by hamdingers

3/17/2026 at 6:06:44 PM

Same feeling here

Heavy Kagi user and the idea behind small web was appealing; but how its implemented don't click with me

Their rules excludes an absolute gem like https://www.sheldonbrown.com/ which is, to me, the essence of what we could call the "small web".

Each times the topic pops up, I try a few random ones and never found anything interesting.

by wiether

3/17/2026 at 8:06:32 PM

Expert/auteur websites like Sheldon Brown's (or, one of my favorites, Ask Aaron https://runamok.tech/AskAaron/FAQ.html) are the pinnacle of what's possible with the small web. Today this kind of info ends up in an ad-ridden hosted wiki or locked away in an unsearchable discord.

There's also novelties like https://www.howmanypeopleareinspacerightnow.com/, this probably hasn't been updated in a decade but that makes it no less interesting.

Then there's exceptionally cool demos like https://thelongestyard.link/q3a-demo/. This sort of thing just doesn't fit in a "blog" format unless you're writing a blog about how you built it and linking out to it.

If anyone knows of a directory of sites like these (preferably with a shuffle option) I'd love to hear about it (and contribute)!

by hamdingers

3/17/2026 at 8:42:04 PM

Sheldon Brown's content is great, but is it ironic that the first thing you see on his site is a Google banner ad?

Understandably, he'd like to earn money on his content and I see no problem with that. But for me to visit his site and have Google add yet another tracking event to their "interest pile" about me (I guess i'm in the market for bikes now?) is a bit off putting.

He can't be making more than a few bucks a month through that single ad, right?

by tty456

3/17/2026 at 9:02:51 PM

I truly had no idea, I guess I've always had an ad blocker.

He's been dead since 2008, so I assume the banner ad keeps the lights on in the absence of his income and input.

by hamdingers

3/17/2026 at 9:03:46 PM

He died about ten years ago.

by casenmgreen

3/17/2026 at 11:22:46 PM

As the author is dead, I'm sure the money goes towards site hosting fees.

by salynchnew

3/18/2026 at 10:26:57 AM

I assume nobody removed it and the revenue is just added to some Google Adsense balance sheet, and reports go to some Gmail account that will expire one day.

by 47282847

3/17/2026 at 8:52:54 PM

> are the pinnacle of what's possible with the small web

if this is the pinnacle then I want nothing to do with it.

by abletonlive

3/17/2026 at 7:25:34 PM

This website is the small web - self contained. It's a really good example of the Internet we had and apparently some still want. I think of it like computer graphics where you're definition of space can get bigger as you add a bunch of resources each with their own model space into the relative context of world space. The small web should define how we do that and discover things, not what or how we build within each specific model space.

by andrew_lettuce

3/17/2026 at 7:10:27 PM

Well, thanks. That small web just taught me in a very concise way a thing or two about bicicle braking technique!

by j1elo

3/17/2026 at 6:31:33 PM

I am looking for something that would filter for sites that rarely post but have good content. The number one problem with most of these systems is that everything favours frequent posting. Even if I do it manually, I cannot keep the tabs over many rarely posting sites - this is an obvious example of a problem that we delegate to computers. Favouring frequent posters creates incentives to do that even if quality worsens.

by zby

3/17/2026 at 7:26:46 PM

The perverse thing here is that's exactly the opposite of how we've traditionally valued resources!

by andrew_lettuce

3/18/2026 at 1:58:36 AM

because we don't value them at all, literally. It's a tragedy of the commons, internet pollution is like air pollution, the polluters don't pay and there's no cost associated with overusing other people's attention.

by Barrin92

3/17/2026 at 7:38:07 PM

I'd be fascinated on the economics of this from Google's perspective: specifically the unit economics on generating updated-once-a-year results to queried-once-in-a-million searches.

Tl;dr: I feel like the long-tail web (90s) was better, but economics pushed high-update-frequency more-centralized results.

by ethbr1

3/17/2026 at 3:17:58 PM

Not only that, I just clicked "Next Post" more than a hundred times, and over 90% of posts I got were about LLMs and coding agents.

by idop

3/17/2026 at 6:58:22 PM

This is a fairly recent phenomenon: I'm a longtime Small Web user and even I struggle with this massive influx of AI posts. I'm hopeful it will be addressed.

by abnercoimbre

3/17/2026 at 5:56:52 PM

I could definitely see value in filters for "has RSS" and "has recent posts"—maybe even as the default view—but I absolutely agree that this is much less interesting to me without the wider world of interesting, small sites.

by jeffalyanak

3/17/2026 at 8:39:19 PM

This is just a blog ring.

I would also love to go back to Geocities style web interaction, but the medium is the message, and the way the Internet has evolved as a medium means that people don't naturally interact with it in a way that supports regression to that era. Attempts to force it like neocities have a hyperreal quality to them.

by viccis

3/18/2026 at 1:36:26 AM

yeah i agree. the crux of it is no corporations / no ads / no astroturfing.

by ajkjk

3/17/2026 at 9:45:38 PM

Well, it's much harder for them to add content from websites that don't have a feed.

by ymolodtsov

3/17/2026 at 11:05:54 AM

On a similar note, I maintain and grow a manually curated collection of personal blogs with valid RSS feeds: https://minifeed.net/blogs

The criteria is simple: human-written (as much as I can validate myself), in English (for now), with valid RSS feed, and not a micro-blog (so, more than just feed of links or short tweet-like messages).

Similar to Kagi's Small Web viewer, or StumbleUpon-style viewer: you can get a random listing of blogs [1] or a random listing of posts from all blogs [2]. Feeds and posts are indexed, so full-text search works across all blogs. When possible and permitted by robots.txt, text is scraped for searching, so even if some text is omitted in the RSS feed by the author, search should work.

Though I do plan to implement a similar "view one random post at source" kind of view, soon.

UPD: Feel free to submit a blog, including your own! [3]

[1] https://minifeed.net/blogs/by/random

[2] https://minifeed.net/global/random

[3] https://minifeed.net/suggest

by freetonik

3/17/2026 at 2:50:11 PM

The implicit criteria (tech/business and adjacent) is an issue with all these lists for me. But it's also a personal list, which is great. I just wish literally anyone in these had a personal interest on anything else reflected in their lists because I keep checking them and being disappointed.

A topic that's come up before on here with others doing the complaining about a list I liked for this reason but wasn't top-loaded with tech: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47015676

by Kye

3/17/2026 at 4:39:04 PM

https://wiby.me/ is interesting. I am not sure if it updates, or if it just has old websites.

by Cider9986

3/17/2026 at 6:34:22 PM

I wish someone curated a list of sites that are llm written - but are not spam. Just to compare :)

by zby

3/17/2026 at 11:47:55 PM

[] /s

by oxag3n

3/18/2026 at 7:50:18 AM

∅

by mastermage

3/18/2026 at 12:28:21 PM

I was interested in something like this for while, thank you!

by nerdyadventurer

3/17/2026 at 10:16:53 AM

Great idea. Index is based on submitted sites:

https://github.com/kagisearch/smallweb/blob/main/smallweb.tx...

There is also Small Comic:

https://kagi.com/smallweb/?comic

https://github.com/kagisearch/smallweb/blob/main/smallcomic....

And Small YouTube:

https://kagi.com/smallweb/?yt

https://github.com/kagisearch/smallweb/blob/main/smallyt.txt

by modernerd

3/17/2026 at 11:30:08 AM

StumbleUpon is that you?

Jokes aside, it's really nice and I can totally see becoming addictive. Kudos to Kagi team for an other user oriented product. (as a side note, I am using Kagi daily and i didn't know about this tool)

by yashasolutions

3/17/2026 at 2:48:53 PM

Yes, SU was fascinating at the time. I kind of like this style of exploring the web; it gets a bit addictive, you spend hours on it but end up finding interesting content and other stuff that you wouldn't otherwise.

by dethos

3/17/2026 at 9:22:29 PM

Man, I wasted days on SU. It was incredibly addictive in a way that did not feel unhealthy.

by beAbU

3/17/2026 at 3:12:35 PM

Im surprised nobody has mentioned cloudhiker which is made to be like stumbleupon.

by chneu

3/17/2026 at 12:39:07 PM

SU was amazing. Stumbling upon Ze Frank? It was internet gold!

by coopreme

3/17/2026 at 11:40:35 AM

I've been using the Kagi search engine for months now and I'm not impressed. I bought into it because there were a lot of posts saying that it was "just like old Google" but this has not been my experience. It's the same as new Google, you can type in what you're looking for exactly and you'll get random sort-of related websites.

I remember when you could half-remember a comment from a website, type that into Google, and get taken to the article you were looking for. That was back in like 2010. To me that's the old, and useful, search engine that I want.

by ArtificeAccount

3/17/2026 at 12:00:54 PM

I switched about a year ago. At the time it did seem like a step up from Google results. But there's been an increasing prevalence of low quality results. Blogspam, AI websites, etc. Obviously not blaming Kagi here, web search has gotten hard recently.

Is Kagi still better than Google? Probably, I don't really know because I don't use Google anymore. But at this point I feel like I'm with them out of inertia more than being an avid supporter. One of these days I'll re-evaluate Google and decide whether to switch back or not.

It does occasionally surface interesting results from small sites that you wouldn't get on Google. I do find that to be useful.

Kagi definitely isn't a bad search engine by any means. Honestly if you haven't used it, try the 100 search free trial on one device. Maybe you'll like it. This feels more like a general decline of the open web.

by the_pwner224

3/17/2026 at 2:06:52 PM

I'm glad to see this comment and the parent comment voted so near the top. I've had the same experience. In my experience, Kagi used to be great... then it became good... and now it's "better than Google".

"Better than Google" and the fact that I can choose websites to exclude from my search results are two features that I remain willing to pay for, however.

by emacdona

3/17/2026 at 4:58:55 PM

I'm extremely confused by these comments. Are we all using the same google? Just to make sure I wasn't crazy I just did a search on Google and 1/2 the page was a combination of google AI result and ads. Below that there were 2.5 links visible. One reddit result, and two blogspam.

The exact same search on Kagi ('best lllm for coding') nets reddit, hacker news, and some other forum results right at the top, followed by a long dense list of links to various sites (including some of the same blogspam of course), but over all the results are hugely more rich and varied and also not at all the same.

How can you possibly say that a site that gives you 50% ads and a bunch of low quality links is remotely "only a little better" than a site that gives you zero ads and a huge number of better quality links?

by tensor

3/17/2026 at 6:48:46 PM

I just block all those results on Google for free with uBlock Origin and uBlacklist.

by ewoodrich

3/17/2026 at 3:44:39 PM

DuckDuckGo allows you to blacklist websites for free

by mattmcal

3/17/2026 at 5:58:44 PM

Only up to five of them, which is almost completely useless.

by Groxx

3/18/2026 at 6:50:49 AM

Blocking Pinterest is not completely useless.

by teruakohatu

3/18/2026 at 1:00:53 PM

The top seven blocked domains on Kagi are all Pinterest: https://kagi.com/stats?stat=insights

Failing to block Pinterest and then also having no room for anything else is almost completely useless.

by Groxx

3/17/2026 at 3:59:18 PM

I'm glad to see this comment and the parent comment and the grandparent comment voted so near the top. I've had the same experience.

I honestly would love to be able to give my Kagi key to the ChatGPT or Claude clients (or more realistically, configure a proxy) just to have it be their primary tool for searches—respecting my site rankings/lists

by searls

3/17/2026 at 4:14:44 PM

I’m confused by this comment. The original comments talk about Kagi not living up to the hype. You say you’ve had the same experience and wish you could get LLMs to use Kagi for web searches?

by fourside

3/17/2026 at 6:52:37 PM

Especially odd as that’s exactly what Kagi assistant already does. Maybe they’d just rather use their key than pay Kagi for LLM based search.

On that note, Kagi research is legit amazing. There have been times I’ve spent 30min searching for something without success. As a last resort I asked Kagi research and it found why I could not. More than one option even. Now intend to use almost more than normal search.

by tensor

3/17/2026 at 2:18:25 PM

I've been using it for 2.5 years at this point, and have the same experience. I don't think it's hopeless, but Kagi will need to step up their methods. IMO, there's actually a lot they can do here.

by stebalien

3/17/2026 at 12:53:29 PM

Everyone has to answer for themselves why they would be OK with Google hoovering up their data in order to deliver substandard results, vs Kagi actively working to remove low-quality results all while collecting no personal data.

by mpalmer

3/17/2026 at 12:58:32 PM

Yes. I use both (Google only at work) and Kagi is certainly no worse and comes with the massive benefit of simply not being Google. It's worth paying for for that reason alone, even if the engineers at Google are constantly working on making sure I'm tracked anyway.

by jmye

3/17/2026 at 12:02:23 PM

I feel the same way. I'm probably going to end my subscription at some point, but right now the effort involved is what's keeping me with Kagi.

by ArtificeAccount

3/17/2026 at 12:27:50 PM

Is usage based pricing available?

I'm thinking of trying it out Kagi, but adding another monthly commitment is what's holding me back.

A single credit top-up and occasional usage until the credits run out sounds good to me.

by 8cvor6j844qw_d6

3/17/2026 at 1:18:27 PM

Edit: Kagi has a starter plan with 100 free searches: https://kagi.com/pricing

Also, from the Kagi privacy pass FAQ at https://blog.kagi.com/kagi-privacy-pass#faq:

    *Do you plan to allow purchasing privacy pass tokens without having an account?*

    Yes, this makes sense. This is possible because technically the extension does not care if you have an account or not. It just needs to be 'loaded' with valid tokens. And you can imagine a mechanism where you could also anonymously purchase them, eg. with monero, without ever creating an account at Kagi. Let us know *here* ( https://kagifeedback.org/d/6163-kagi-privacy-pass )  if you are excited about this, as it will help prioritize it.
Personally I don't like being signed in during searches, this seems like a good solution.

by Tepix

3/17/2026 at 3:34:12 PM

"the effort involved"

Feels like your comment saying it was too much effort to cancel Kagi took more effort than cancelling Kagi.

by monkey_monkey

3/17/2026 at 3:40:18 PM

Actually their payment model has some baked in niceness.

If you don't use the service in a month, they just refund you. This has kept me from unsubscribing for years now. Some months I use it, some I don't.

It's more of hassle to unsub, and re-sub again when I want.

by vvilliamperez

3/17/2026 at 8:16:06 PM

I think you're right, haha

by ArtificeAccount

3/17/2026 at 12:25:01 PM

It’s definitely not Kagi’s fault. The AI slop is simply taking effect and I feel sorry for them. I never expected them to match Google’s quality, but I was impressed with how close it was when I used it a few years ago.

by sheepscreek

3/17/2026 at 12:45:33 PM

Kagi used to use Google's search API. They discuss the current state of their index here: https://blog.kagi.com/waiting-dawn-search

by postalcoder

3/18/2026 at 1:56:09 PM

Buried under a lot of complaints about fairness, Kagi mentions they are still using Google search results, just without authorization.

> Because direct licensing isn't available to us on compatible terms, we - like many others - use third-party API providers for SERP-style results (SERP meaning search engine results page).

So in one sense, yes, Kagi isn't quite Google, but in another sense, it very much still is.

by rpdillon

3/17/2026 at 12:13:06 PM

I've been using Kagi for ~18months and your description doesn't match my experience at all.

Querying for something like "snowflake json from variant?" in both engines and in google I get a sort-of-right-but-not-really-that-helpful ai summary about "parse_json" function. In Kagi I get an actually useful summary with code examples of parse_json, but also the colon-based syntax for accessing values inside nested objects without needing to parse anything.

I very rarely need to go into a page, I use Kagi quick search summary with the "?" suffix and it almost always gives me a useful answer in one-shot.

by zknill

3/17/2026 at 4:42:35 PM

First of all, the parent comment's point is that Kagi is often be praised for being like so-called-old-Google[0]. So it's only reasonable to assume they only care about the links, not the LLM summary. What you described is even further from old Google.

Second, if you want this kind of LLM-digested search result, Google AI studio blows everything out of water (including Google search, obviously).

[0] I've never bought into the idea that old Google was so much better. But it seems to be a very popular opinion on HN. ymmv.

by raincole

3/17/2026 at 12:41:15 PM

But then you're not using kagi search just the LLM

by singpolyma3

3/17/2026 at 12:51:29 PM

No, the responses are backed by searches.

by mpalmer

3/17/2026 at 2:31:24 PM

So some guy does hard work developing some technique or solving some problem. He documents his experience, puts up a tutorial on DO or AWS or somewhere else, and the ads on that document help offset the cost of hosting. Now comes along Kagi, scrapes that data, and presents it to you, their paying customer.

I see a problem with this.

by dotancohen

3/17/2026 at 3:20:30 PM

Do you pay LLM providers for agentic features? From your past submissions, you certainly seem to. Do those features make web searches and curl the results?

Were the models underlying those features trained on all available web content, or are they unlike any other enterprise models out there?

At any rate, you should see a bigger problem in what Google does, which you don't seem to.

by mpalmer

3/17/2026 at 6:59:00 PM

One way or another the ad driven model has to go. It’s toxic for society.

by tensor

3/17/2026 at 9:56:05 PM

That doesn't make it the same as search results

by singpolyma3

3/17/2026 at 1:12:17 PM

Try g.ai. It's stupid fast and uses google indexes. Kagi? sometimes doesn't correctly parse intent, in Google thing you can just ask function doing this and gives you it, with examples, grounding and extremely fast. I'm paying for kagi since the begging and I guess id cancel it because it gives not so much added value

by 0xdeafbeef

3/17/2026 at 1:21:32 PM

Off topic, but ref

"I remember when you could half-remember a comment from a website, type that into Google, and get taken to the article you were looking for"

It's funny to me that (to my knowledge) no browser (mainstream?) implement this functionality yet. Seems like a no brainer to index what the user have actually seen... (Could even be restricted based on viewport - I don't think it's that crazy of an idea)

I know there's a a number of third party programs which does though. Of course - multi-device being the norm - complicates things.

by olejorgenb

3/17/2026 at 2:37:41 PM

>It's funny to me that (to my knowledge) no browser (mainstream?) implement this functionality yet. Seems like a no brainer to index what the user have actually seen...

The answer to this is complicated.

Both Google Chrome and Microsoft Edge actually implement this. Behind the scenes, both will upload your browser history to the cloud. You can see it in network packet captures. It's implemented in the browser for the vendor, but not for the user.

The choice to not implement this for the user is very deliberate. It's contrary to the vendor's interests if the browser provides this capability directly to users. If a user's browser can take you to a website directly, then you are not using the vendor's search engine, meaning you are not looking at their ads, paid search results, algorithm, etc. It would severly impact their business model.

This is also the reason why browsers have:

- Adopted Google Chrome's "Omnibar" instead of a separate address bar and search bar.

- Implement only basic hierarchical organization for browser Favorites.

Directly and indirectly, Google is the central nexus of all modern browsers. Aside from Google Chrome, they also:

- Fund the vast majority of Firefox.

- Pay Apple for preferential treatment.

- Provide the same mechanisms to vendors who base their browsers on Chromium (i.e., Microsoft Edge, Brave).

I would love for this to not be the case. There is hope to be found in small independent browser and search companies/projects.

by evanjrowley

3/17/2026 at 5:35:27 PM

Never thought about this, but it makes sense they don't want a better local search, just for users to rely more on their product. It's messed up - so much time and human potential wasted on poor search and ads.

by everlier

3/17/2026 at 2:47:13 PM

> Adopted Google Chrome's "Omnibar" instead of a separate address bar and search bar.

On the other hand, the additional tools in the Omnibar (calculator is the example most should be familiar with) makes the bar incredibly useful for random daily tasks. Also, it seems that there is an "omnibox" API that extensions can use, which allows them to add their own tools to the omnibar/omnibox. Would be interesting as a form of "assistant" in a way.

by skycrafter0

3/17/2026 at 10:09:20 PM

Thank you! I was wondering why bookmarks are treated so poorly by browser, as if they are forced to include them but hate them with a passion. That explains it. I'm a bit of a bookmark hoarder to the point where I have a local html file that holds and displays all my bookmarks and I've got that page set as my default.

by jimjimjim

3/17/2026 at 2:44:07 PM

> both will upload your browser history to the cloud

I wonder if the EU could fine them a couple weeks of revenue for this. Seems illegal.

by nubg

3/17/2026 at 2:59:07 PM

I'm 80%+ sure the claim is BS

by olejorgenb

3/17/2026 at 4:08:19 PM

It's not BS for the people who don't understand the dark patters that guide users to enabling all of this stuff. That's everyone with a Windows PC who didn't bypass the Microsoft account requirement and went with all of the defaults in Microsoft Edge. Everyone using Chrome Enterprise/Education whose Google Workspace admins don't want to get into trouble for not backing up people's stuff (i.e., sharing it all with Google). Same goes for company Windows PCs set up with Microsoft Entra ID. It's everyone with an Android device and a Google account who wants their settings backed up or transfers to a new Android device. It's in the fine print and legalese for all of these products and services.

by evanjrowley

3/17/2026 at 3:27:55 PM

>Both Google Chrome and Microsoft Edge actually implement this. [...] both will upload your browser history to the cloud.

I'm fairly certain I've caught Firefox doing something similar (regularly sending multiple tens of MB to Google servers in the background.)

by windowliker

3/17/2026 at 4:34:11 PM

So fwiw, browsing history shouldn’t be anywhere near that big making it unlikely there what it was. It compresses well, if they were to do it I’m sure they’d do it at regular intervals instead of a years’ worth at a time, etc.

And, of course, Firefox is open source and this wouldn’t be kept a secret.

by ComputerGuru

3/17/2026 at 6:10:01 PM

In which case I'd love to know what it was doing sending that much data to Google IPs when I don't use Google services...

I've read all the Mozilla help pages about what automatic connections Firefox makes and it wasn't accounted for there (unless possibly something to do with SafeBrowsing.)

by windowliker

3/17/2026 at 2:58:40 PM

> Both Google Chrome and Microsoft Edge actually implement this. Behind the scenes, both will upload your browser history to the cloud. You can see it in network packet captures. It's implemented in the browser for the vendor, but not for the user.

Citation needed... (I'm talking about the page *content*, not the metadata like url and title)

by olejorgenb

3/17/2026 at 2:07:33 PM

There are things like Mymind (SaaS) or Karakeep (selfhosted) that do this, though they require you to explicitly save the pages instead of indexing everything by default

by flexagoon

3/17/2026 at 2:38:47 PM

I would really like to see integration between Karakeep and SearXNG so that I could combine online search engine results with my self-hosted bookmarks serice.

by evanjrowley

3/17/2026 at 2:43:03 PM

If only some operating system incorporated a way to make everything you've seen on your computer locally searchable, wouldn't that be a neat feature?

by vel0city

3/17/2026 at 2:53:29 PM

I believe there some projects trying this now using OCR IIRC.

Did even Microsoft try something like this? It's of course something you'd only want running locally

by olejorgenb

3/17/2026 at 3:13:31 PM

I think the joke is that Microsoft did do something very like this -- they call it Windows Recall -- and it got a lot of angry pushback. (Partly, IIRC, because the specific way they did it initially was very bad in terms of security and privacy, but I think a lot of people quite understandably don't trust them to implement it (a) the way they claim they do or (b) competently, so even after they made a bunch of changes aimed at making it less scary it's still viewed with a lot of hostility.)

by gjm11

3/17/2026 at 5:12:31 PM

Ah :wooosh:, :D

by olejorgenb

3/17/2026 at 3:40:16 PM

> no brainer to index what the user have actually seen... I know there's a a number of third party programs which does though

Which company would you trust with this kind of deep surveillance information on you though?

by mock-possum

3/17/2026 at 5:42:16 PM

I would trust Firefox if they made a version which did the indexing locally. I think I'd trust chrome as well as long as it was implemented locally.

by olejorgenb

3/17/2026 at 9:30:21 PM

There's an old Mac app that tried to do it. History hound. It sometimes worked

by paradox460

3/17/2026 at 1:55:01 PM

That's called search: in history.

by hirako2000

3/17/2026 at 2:09:28 PM

That doesn't search the content of the pages you've browsed, though, right?

by hoppyhoppy2

3/17/2026 at 2:40:51 PM

Right, I misunderstood the case.

I guess because it isn't then trivial for a web browser to do, indexing every text ever rendered?

by hirako2000

3/17/2026 at 2:40:01 PM

I think you would need to take it a step further and do full-text search on loaded pages. It's certainly possible but probably pretty data intensive.

by packetlost

3/17/2026 at 1:35:57 PM

[dead]

by catlover76

3/17/2026 at 1:10:56 PM

I’ve been using kagi for about eight months now as well and at least in Europe it’s a significantly better search engine than Google by a long shot. The results are significantly more accurate. I don’t get listicles I don’t get AI spam. I get what I’m searching for, it’s refreshing.

The assistant is a nice addition but it’s search is superior for me.

by DuzAwe

3/17/2026 at 12:04:22 PM

For over two years I’ve maintained the practice of using Kagi and falling back to Google if I couldn’t find something. I can count the number of successes doing that on one hand. In the meantime I get to support a company which actually respects me as a user and isn’t doing things like tying accounts to browsers, AMP (trying to take over the web), trying to kill adblock, etc.

by user3939382

3/17/2026 at 5:45:22 PM

That's totally fair, though I personally don't share your experience. It could be that we just use search for slightly different reasons.

One of the reasons I love Kagi is that it respects double-quotes for exact matches. This might seem trivial except I remember being frustrated with both Google and DDG years ago for throwing irrelevant results at me even when I'm querying for an exact match. When Kagi was in beta and I got invited as an early adopter, my feedback to them was that I want a search engine that won't throw crap at me when I'm looking for an exact string match. They've honored that feedback! Even though Kagi doesn't necessarily have the most results, I want double-quotes and things like intitle to actually work as expected.

Another awesome thing about Kagi is how it lets you prioritize certain domain names. Likewise, it's great for blocking domains completely. All of this has made my search results very clean.

To each their own. I'm not saying you're wrong, but to me there's no comparison between Kagi's results and every alternative I've tried.

Oh, another thing I like about Kagi is that it's less censored than Google, Bing, and DDG these days. I used to be a fan of DDG until I noticed that results were sparse or nonexistent for anything even remotely controversial I queried. It became too PG-rated.

by ravenstine

3/17/2026 at 1:03:33 PM

this is hard to evaluate, but we cannot replicate the old web search experience not just of Google, but Altavista, Lycos or Yahoo, when most of the web is siloed and increasingly botted - simply because the stuff you see in the siloed internet is actively "protected" out of your control

perhaps the best we can do is this "small web" thing which can be seen as some sort of retrofuturistic solution, but of course the siloed internet is a black hole of content and effort, and of course if the small web gets enough traction, astroturfed generative AI content will target it

by muyuu

3/17/2026 at 2:09:53 PM

I've been using it for over 2 years now. I'm quite happy with it. I like that I don't see adds and my searches aren't being used to target ads against me.

by graton

3/18/2026 at 12:32:24 AM

+1 searching anything non-business related is so good compared to the bloated AI + ads Google serves nowadays

by luisgvv

3/17/2026 at 3:08:03 PM

The only thing that seems to have gotten a lot worse is the trend of ai articles- which isn't kagi's fault but it would be nice if they could figure out how to filter them. They all follow the same patter- "specific thing you want" with a table of contents with loads of repeated chapters and unrelated information, spattered with effectively random images.

by Vexs

3/17/2026 at 4:12:30 PM

They’re starting to with their stopslop. Sites that are mostly ai content get flagged and deranked. Still not perfect and I think they only just started working on the backlog of reports so hopefully it holds up helping.

by dawnerd

3/17/2026 at 11:52:18 AM

Funny to look back and recall how useful web search actually was at one point. Ahh the good old days.

by windowliker

3/17/2026 at 12:03:49 PM

The enshittification of everything has really put a damper on the technological optimism that seemed to be the norm back then.

by ArtificeAccount

3/17/2026 at 3:00:48 PM

We had the tech we were always promised and then it got taken away, for... reasons.

by windowliker

3/17/2026 at 12:09:05 PM

[dead]

by rusty-peanuts

3/17/2026 at 3:09:53 PM

I really loved Kagi and was a paid customer for close to two years. But sadly this year I wont be renewing my plan.

Kagi made search feel just “right” it was simple, got the job done and had some really simple but cool search features.

But over time they started doing way too much, and I kept seeing more and more features that I really didn't want. It felt like I was paying for all this while I just wanted to type something on to a text box and click search and see a bunch of results organized according to my filters.

I wish they would just dump all the other nonsense projects like ai and just focus on search only. Or give me an option to pay for search only without any limits.

by malikNF

3/17/2026 at 4:11:11 PM

I do agree actually but I’m sticking with them. Their mission of ending slop but also pushing ai tools seem at odds. On one hand they’re marketing to the anti ai crowd while also joining the ai hype? It’s weird.

by dawnerd

3/17/2026 at 6:06:54 PM

As I'm not familiar with how Kagi is "pushing ai tools" this is mostly a comment on the framing of your question.

Are you really saying that a company specializing in search - natural language oriented at its core - should not make use of the biggest technological revolution for processing natural language?

by olejorgenb

3/17/2026 at 6:16:45 PM

No, I meant their push of their assistant, summarizer, and news product (which is ai generated summaries).

by dawnerd

3/17/2026 at 12:48:15 PM

I've switched as of a few years back and it definitely works like pre-AI/search index degradation for me. But I def understand search is very user specific based on how you search and what you are targeting.

by spicycode

3/17/2026 at 12:40:22 PM

I feel like I can still do this with Google if I use quotes.

Kagi I've been using and it's fine. Better than DDG for sure. But sometimes I still go back to google to find something kagi is struggling with.

by singpolyma3

3/17/2026 at 2:16:22 PM

I’ve been on Kagi for over a year and I’m pretty happy with it. At the beginning there were some noticeable differences in results that frustrated me, but at this point I don’t really miss Google except for some of the nice “not web site results” features like calculation and conversion. I mostly go straight to Wolfram Alpha for those now. And for a lot of the “random curiosity satisfaction” stuff where I would have preferred Google results, I’ll now just use ChatGPT or Gemini.

by tshaddox

3/17/2026 at 11:53:01 AM

What you describe sounds more like a large ElasticSearch like full-text index over the entire internet.

by hrmtst93837

3/17/2026 at 12:01:03 PM

Whatever it was called, it was way better than whatever Google is doing currently.

by ArtificeAccount

3/17/2026 at 12:04:09 PM

In fairness, there wasn't the level of utter crap back then that there is now. Not that there wasn't a LOT back then, but there is even more now.

by sodapopcan

3/17/2026 at 12:17:36 PM

People say that, but on the other hand companies like Google have a lot of much better ways of categorizing things now than they did in the past. I'm not sure I buy the excuse of "gosh, it's just too hard for us :(" from this international company worth trillions employing geniuses.

It really feels either intentional or egregiously incompetent.

by ArtificeAccount

3/17/2026 at 12:53:01 PM

That's fair.

by sodapopcan

3/17/2026 at 1:21:10 PM

How comes yandex.com can show me results that contain my search term? Most egregious example: I am searching for name of abandoned blogspot domain: yandex shows me 1 result, which is that domain. Goolge shows me "no results" fishing monster. Blogspot is google service !!!

by 112233

3/17/2026 at 3:28:15 PM

Yep that was my experience to. It wasn’t bad necessarily, but certainly not as reliable / dependable as google, and not worth paying for.

Could just be that I’m familiar enough with google to always be able to make it work for me, could be a frog in boiling water type situation, but… as much as Kagi gets talked up on HN, I was pretty disappointed when I tried it. I was ready to get blown away, and instead I was underwhelmed.

by mock-possum

3/17/2026 at 2:03:56 PM

throw a question mark on the end to invoke the AI summary results and I find you can get the thing you're looking for as a reference right away. I've used this to dig up forum posts that are over a decade old multiple times with success. Asking the Kagi Assistant for a list of possible links works pretty well too.

Also on Kagi if you see bad results, you can flag the website to ignore it.

by threetonesun

3/17/2026 at 1:44:10 PM

Disagree, I love it, at least as good as Google

by alpineman

3/17/2026 at 1:53:32 PM

I think that's the problem. I used to find it far superior to google. Now, there are a lot of queries where I am unimpressed with the results and end up trying google just to get better results. (like I used to do with DDG)

I've had a few experiences now where someone is standing over my shoulder asking me to look something up, and I search kagi, find nothing, then search google and find what they asked me to look up. Then when they ask "what was that other search engine you used first?" I don't feel compelled to vouch for kagi :(.

by LatticeAnimal

3/17/2026 at 4:11:13 PM

For needle-in-the-haystack searches, I find longer quotes works really well (in Kagi or google)

Kagi value proposition for me is not the $5 search but the $10 search plus whatever AI chat model you want (I originally did ultimate when I used it for coding). Controllable search and chat satisfies all my one-shot needs.

I can't really blame Kagi for the web getting bad or for the weak market for secondary search. Part of me wonders if they could use the AI search tools now on the market (now getting lots of investment) instead of the human indexes (subject to monopoly control).

by w10-1

3/17/2026 at 2:10:36 PM

I think it's completely unreasonable to assume that anyone would beat Google at the search game, by outgoogling them.

The reason, that Google is not like it was back in the day is that they are fighting a massive, antagonistic industry designed to game Google. The reason that chatGPT et al improves on search is that there's a effective but very expensive compute layer on top, not that they are better at the Google game. (This extra layer works out fine, because our time is more valuable and Google always came at an insane discount, also thanks to ads)

by jstummbillig

3/17/2026 at 4:15:15 PM

The good news is that Google search results have degraded so much that competitors like Kagi can compete directly. I moved off Google search completely on all devices ~1 year ago and I don't miss it at all, most of the time I forget I have a kagi subscription.

by hadlock

3/17/2026 at 8:12:45 PM

I am quite happy with my Kagi search results. The biggest weakness I have noticed in my few months using it is that it is a terrible experience for shopping. I believe this is due to similar factors that make it feel like a less spammy ad-ridden experience overall. It works well enough for product research, but comparing across product vendor's product pages tends to suck. I have to use a specific lens to shop for Raspberry Pi or Microcontrollers for example.

by Computer0

3/17/2026 at 1:40:20 PM

I won't add links so it doesn't look like I'm spamming or promoting a service (though I am, but it seems in line with what you're talking about), but there's a product I've built with my wife which has made things a little bit better in our experience because it gives you an option to choose different providers/indexes, thus tailor results to your personal preference. You can find it from my personal website (my username . com).

by BrunoBernardino

3/17/2026 at 3:41:59 PM

Agreed, I have not been impressed with Kagi at all.

by dimgl

3/17/2026 at 2:25:21 PM

It's hard to judge one's personal experience with "personalized" search engines. I have personalized search turned off for Google so Kagi is a much better experience for me. I'd recommend leaning more into their feature to lower/block sites from your results, which with Google would require an extension for a similar but degraded experience.

by prophesi

3/17/2026 at 11:32:15 PM

> I remember when you could half-remember a comment from a website, type that into Google, and get taken to the article you were looking for.

You should try that on more niche user-centric search engines, like https://altpower.app

So glad I discovered it!

by 1kurac

3/17/2026 at 1:21:07 PM

I typed in my dentist's full business name and location, "<name> family dentistry <city> <state>", and it was still #5 in the results. I still, out of habit, tapped the first link and called that number instead. It's ludicrous. In 2010 that would have been the top hit, next to the Wikipedia page on dentistry.

by cjohnson318

3/17/2026 at 2:30:45 PM

> I remember when you could half-remember a comment from a website, type that into Google, and get taken to the article you were looking for.

Is that even possible today considering there is so much more information and pages around today than in 2010? Old google worked with old Internet. The old Internet does not exist.

by flakeoil

3/17/2026 at 11:44:05 AM

In comparisons (often shared here) among SERPs, kagi has tended to have fewer blatant results campers crowding out original authoritative sources.

And yes, Google's founders were right that web ads would kill that experience you want.

by Terretta

3/17/2026 at 3:10:43 PM

I found kagi lacking and very limited unless i paid. Even with a paid sub it didnt feel like good value.

Im using qwant now and i feel its better.

by chneu

3/17/2026 at 2:50:56 PM

It’s a search engine, not a global grep.

by deadbabe

3/17/2026 at 3:32:52 PM

it probably doesn't help that they're constantly bifurcating their tiny team into new projects. their browser is essentially nonfunctional for daily use but they've already moved on to porting it to Linux

by ashivkum

3/17/2026 at 4:38:08 PM

I am very impressed. Kagi manages to maintain Google-par quality or better most of the time, whereas DDG became an unusable slop pit a few years ago. I'm a very happy customer and happy to keep paying for both Kagi and Orion, in part on principle and in part because the product actually works very well for me.

I don't even use the AI assistant much, only when there are a lot of disjointed search results and I want a quick summary.

by gwerbin

3/17/2026 at 4:06:59 PM

I have the complete opposite experience and it works wonders for me.

by dawnerd

3/17/2026 at 4:32:51 PM

Why have you used it for months now if you're not impressed?

by Falimonda

3/17/2026 at 8:18:20 PM

Because I'm too lazy to unsubscribe. It's cheap so it's not high on my list of things to do, lol.

by ArtificeAccount

3/17/2026 at 3:13:26 PM

I have had a great experience. I can find what I'm looking for and I can block or down-rank sites that are constantly shite. I did find that Google over the past few years has sucked but my Google results were always miles better than most peoples until a couple years ago.

It's interesting to hear that you can't find what you wanted easily on Kagi.

by eightys3v3n

3/17/2026 at 5:13:03 PM

Kagi uses Google (and other) indexes.

The main usecase for Kagi is the fact that you can personally uprank/downrank/pin/block sites. And it has a bunch of creature comforts built in like:

- Attempting to detect AI slop, concatenating listicles ("10 best ...") under one search result heade

- Attempting to block translated Reddit results

- Custom lenses that search only coding resources or recipes or whatnot

- Redirects (so x.com > xcancel.com), although I feel this should be a browser feature

- Better translate than Google

There's probably a few things I'm forgetting.

Kagi is abysmal at image search though. Just assume you will have to use Google for that.

by jorvi

3/17/2026 at 4:19:44 PM

Is that possible today? I have no data but I assume the scale of “the web” grew a couple of orders of magnitude compared to 2012.

by atmosx

3/17/2026 at 11:57:51 AM

The first random page it returned to me was this — https://gaultier.github.io/blog/how_to_make_your_own_static_... — which was about building one's own static site generator, which I really liked. I did not realise when I closed that page how hard it would be to find it again, because, of course every new visit to Kagi returns a different page :-)

by azangru

3/17/2026 at 3:03:12 PM

yeah, same happened to me, the first site I was sent to was a list of people sending in random "sunday thoughts" (or whatever it was called) on (actual physical) postcards which then got scanned and posted. There were some good things in there. Now I can't find that site again because I didn't realize it was randomized...

by dark-star

3/18/2026 at 8:24:15 AM

do you not have a browser history?

by mastermage

3/17/2026 at 11:16:07 AM

I do love the concept, but a little part of me died each time I came across an article with a very strong AI voice. That just feels antithetical to the ‘small web’ ethos because it obscures the ‘neighbor’ behind it.

by arscan

3/17/2026 at 11:54:34 AM

Welcome to 2026 when the next door neighbour is an AI datacentre using up all your groundwater.

by windowliker

3/17/2026 at 11:43:56 AM

[dead]

by hristian

3/17/2026 at 2:31:04 PM

I'm one of the contributors for the Obsidian RSS reader (https://github.com/amatya-aditya/obsidian-rss-dashboard) and one of my first contributions to the project was adding in the Kagi RSS feed to the discover page!

It refreshes every 5 hours and shows you the most recent blogs published on Kagi. Check it out!

by marcd35

3/17/2026 at 10:25:12 AM

I like the idea, but would like to be able to select a language and see the small web of that language. There are more languages than English, and this tool could make them thrive.

Also somehow if they are clever, they could use this for those translation system they are using, but please let us select our own language without feeding automatic translation like youtube does).

by erremerre

3/17/2026 at 11:16:58 AM

I think the problem is that it's hard to curate feeds in a language you don't understand. I've been building an uncurated index of OPML blogrolls, with no language restriction. The OPML blogrolls are curated by their owners, so someone decided they met some inclusion criteria, but the overall list is uncurated.

https://alexsci.com/rss-blogroll-network/

by 8organicbits

3/17/2026 at 4:52:56 PM

Love Kagi and most things they do, don't get me wrong, but this is a bit ironic:

https://kagi.com/smallweb/?url=https://pliutau.com/reading-l...

> This page is auto-generated from Github Actions workflow that runs every day at night and fetches the 5 latest articles from each of my favorite blogs.

by barbazoo

3/18/2026 at 1:09:47 AM

It would've been ironic if we had infinite resources, but this entire project is built and maintained by one person - me. If this is the only thing you found wrong with it - I'll pat myself on the back :)

ps. If you don't want to see this blog again in Small Web, jsut submit a PR to remove it - index of sites is a crowd-sourced effort. Cheers

by freediver

3/17/2026 at 10:43:36 AM

So, basically, a random site from their index of ~30,000 sites.

You can choose similar sites by index.

But what are the criterion to have your site listed here, or how it will prevent this from just becoming a massive gamified advertising index, or anything more about "why these?" is not obvious to me.

Can anyone explain what is special about these sites specifically, or where this project is going?

by sam_goody

3/17/2026 at 11:46:37 AM

Could've at least checked if the website even allows embedding before embedding it, I found two by randomly clicking around that don't.

by input_sh

3/17/2026 at 12:05:20 PM

Yeah, many links in the embedded blog posts don't work either, presumably because the target website doesn't allow embedding. On mobile I always have to open them in a new tab for them to work.

by codethief

3/17/2026 at 3:13:26 PM

Some browsers actually block embedded pages. Lots of mozilla based browsers will.

by chneu

3/17/2026 at 6:19:48 PM

No, it's the website owners setting a specific header (X-Frame-Options to SAMEORIGIN), as it prevents someone else from embedding your website and phishing for user credentials.

No browser prevents that by default, but this tip is found in pretty much every "best practices" hosting tutorial, so it's very common to stumble upon that browser error in the wild.

by input_sh

3/17/2026 at 12:18:52 PM

I run a Hugo blog and I get more interesting referral traffic from Kagi's small web index than from Google at this point. 5,000 curated sites is small enough to be useful most "indie web" directories are graveyards unfortunately..

by 7777777phil

3/17/2026 at 2:13:33 PM

Does it work for you guys to go to about and then click on the "list" link?

For me it says I'm blocked due to hitting a "secondary" rate limit (don't understand what that means). I don't think I've opened a page on github yet today so clearly it's a lie. Is it the referer that triggers this?

In general, freeloading the "small web" on a Microsoft service is kind of ironic. Being blocked by algorithms that try to detect if you're really human is precisely one of the things one would hope to get away from by using small, personal websites

by Aachen

3/17/2026 at 2:25:53 PM

If you’re not signed into GitHub, it always throws those errors page (maybe due to scrapping being done with residential IP addresses).

by skydhash

3/17/2026 at 4:37:55 PM

Cool, so much for the small web

No scrapers running on my IP address btw, at least not since it was assigned to me ~10 hours ago (I'm in one of those countries where ISPs seem to have agreed amongst each other that IP addresses must change daily so you can't reliably host things)

by Aachen

3/17/2026 at 10:00:51 AM

StumbleUpon?

by emehex

3/17/2026 at 10:40:23 AM

Personally my favorite spiritual successor to stumbleupon has been cloudhiker.net. I found kagis to be too personal blog focused for my tastes. I love that kagi is doing so much of this out in the open though.

There are a surprising amount out there: https://blog.woblick.dev/en/2025/best-stumbleupon-alternativ...

by rdmuser

3/17/2026 at 11:01:27 AM

Hi, creator of Cloudhiker here. Thanks for mentioning my site! Let me know if you have any questions, issues or ideas.

by Kovah

3/17/2026 at 10:01:23 AM

I miss StumbleUpon so much!

by timvdalen

3/17/2026 at 10:48:08 AM

First thing I thought... honestly we should bring it back anyway

by pu_pe

3/18/2026 at 8:02:41 AM

This thread inspired me to build a decentralised tool to explore the small web: https://susam.net/wander/

If you like it and if you have a website, please join the network. It only takes uploading two files to your web server to set it up. In fact, you can host it on GitHub Pages or Codeberg Pages too. And you can link to any small website (not just blogs).

Details about how it works and how to set it up available here: https://codeberg.org/susam/wander#readme

by susam

3/17/2026 at 4:11:43 PM

I have the impression that Kagi is trending here every month

by the_axiom

3/17/2026 at 11:16:07 AM

Bit bummed. The first random page I landed on was a really interesting article for me. The custom cursor (well why not) had me struggling to following a link, and instinctively I refreshed the page. I ended up somewhere else in the haystack with ostensibly no way back to that particular article.

Perhaps I'm yelling into the void here, but what would be great is when first landing at kagi.com/smallweb, the url query parameter would be somehow set, as it is when "Next Post" is clicked.

by unbindableisaac

3/17/2026 at 11:30:09 AM

doesn't solve the root problem, but maybe try searching for the topic in kagi with the small web lens?

by bjord

3/17/2026 at 12:06:07 PM

I think it would, so long as the redirected URL with the search parameter was diarized into browser history. It would however introduce a behavior change that may be undesired (users need to know to press "Next Post" instead of refreshing).

In any case, my Kagi search for the article containing the memorable phrase "rare as rocking-horse s*t" came up empty. Perhaps it's not yet been indexed.

by unbindableisaac

3/17/2026 at 12:54:34 PM

Too many AI or relegion related sites.

by myth_drannon

3/17/2026 at 1:48:39 PM

Tried it myself, first three I got were also about AI.

Curious if there are any statistics on which topics people are writing about.

by bryanhogan

3/18/2026 at 1:11:52 AM

Click the Topics button.

by freediver

3/18/2026 at 12:58:37 PM

How did I miss topics button!? It makes the whole experience absolutely different.

by myth_drannon

3/18/2026 at 4:27:05 PM

The insight that multi-agent coordination is fundamentally a type-checking problem — catch structural failures before spending the compute — is the most practical framing I've seen for this space. The adversarial composition example where information partitioning emerges from types rather than instructions is especially elegant. Looking forward to the follow-up on memory architecture.

by ThomIves

3/17/2026 at 3:58:52 PM

Ah, this might explain the traffic from Kagi a week or so ago. I've been scratching my head over that one. I just checked, and my wee little blog is listed in smallweb.txt. Neat!

Curious what goes on behind the Next Post and Show Similar buttons.

by Venn1

3/18/2026 at 1:11:18 AM

Next post is random. Show similar uses semantic search to find most similar indexed post. You also get the same effect if you 'like' a post.

by freediver

3/17/2026 at 1:12:02 PM

My blog was getting traffic from that domain! So that is what that is.

by rusakov-field

3/17/2026 at 3:14:19 PM

Same. I got an influx of bots from Singapore (around 50 visits per day) and in figuring out what's up with traffic, I noticed kagi as a reference for the first time.

Weird times. People are training their LLMs on my content yet people are still interested in technical content written by a human being. So I guess you just keep writing, right? I find it disheartening to know I'm training LLMs but I think I'm more encouraged knowing there are still humans reading it.

by steve_adams_86

3/17/2026 at 3:24:41 PM

My attitude with writing has been : "Write to the void". There is nothing else to do.

by rusakov-field

3/17/2026 at 11:10:38 PM

Yep, insert the "always has been" meme. I learned from my early blogging that finding something that was popular just ended up having me chase that high again, instead of the things I wanted to be writing. True of every platform before and since.

by ChrisGammell

3/17/2026 at 10:39:06 AM

Some context would be helpful

by drstewart

3/17/2026 at 3:50:07 PM

When I first clicked through, I got an inane essay about how people you love are like Bitcoin. At least I knew it wasn't written by an LLM due to the misspellings and simple errors in thought, but I wondered why that article was on the front page of HN.

by lern_too_spel

3/18/2026 at 8:40:07 AM

Kagi betting on the small web is a smart differentiation play. Google has essentially optimized for large, authoritative domains — which means personal blogs, niche forums, and indie projects get buried even when they have the most relevant content for specific queries.

The small web is where genuine expertise lives. When I'm looking for a real opinion on a tool or a deep technical explanation, I almost never find it on the first page of Google anymore. It's all SEO-optimized content farm articles or AI-generated summaries. The actual expert wrote a blog post that's sitting on page 5.

The challenge is curation at scale. Manually identifying quality small web content works when the corpus is small, but maintaining quality as it grows requires either very good automated signals or a community-driven approach. Curious how Kagi balances this.

by bubblerme

3/17/2026 at 9:26:09 PM

Kagi lost focus. I pay for their search and I’m getting close to giving up. I’ve noticed several times that Google Search gets more relevant results for the same query. On top of having a better search AI.

Whimsical detours like this feels like they’re operating aa early Google minus the killer product.

by hitekker

3/17/2026 at 9:51:41 PM

The commits in their repo for this project goes back multiple years. I don't believe it is a whimsical detour.

by Computer0

3/17/2026 at 11:08:34 AM

Interesting, really like the idea. Maybe in the future a possibility to use it in multiple languages

by jwelten

3/17/2026 at 2:18:57 PM

I think it shows the limits of hand curation. It's a tiny, human-reviewed slice of the "small web", only allowing a subset of blogs... but if you select the "programming" category and click around for a short while, you get a fair amount of obvious AI slop.

I don't think it's Kagi's fault, but I guess it's depressing in a way. A lot of "small web" bloggers dream of being a part of the "big web", and when they get a cheat button, they have no second thoughts about mashing it.

by lich_king

3/17/2026 at 1:03:12 PM

How do we keep getting surprised by enshittification!?

The worst case scenario is that AI runs everything, we have no skills, and are completely dependent on it...and it shows us crummy commercials and subtly steers us to paid placement with no recourse whatsoever. I hate this possible future, but this is where the money will lead.

by titzer

3/17/2026 at 3:59:58 PM

As Kevin Hassett, director of the National Economic Council, said today:

> "It would hurt consumers, and we'd have to think about what we'd have to do about that, but that's really the last of our concerns right now."

by iAMkenough

3/17/2026 at 6:06:12 PM

First impressions: My first five pages were stallman.org, a paywalled cybersec newsletter, a German-language blog, an AI-generated blog post ad for a cattle fencing service, and a blog republishing a Disney Parks press release

by starkparker

3/17/2026 at 3:11:34 PM

I thought this was going to be about payment processing for shareware applications.

by papakatsu

3/17/2026 at 6:10:06 PM

This is cool, it reminds me of stumbleupon from back in the day

by __erik

3/17/2026 at 1:38:56 PM

This is fantastic - how long do I have to press F5 before my blog shows up?

:-)

by lelanthran

3/17/2026 at 2:05:27 PM

Can we just agree that the internet is broken and no amount of boutique search solutions will save it? Kagi, DDG, Google they are all trying to do a search in a pile of steaming sh*, in a hope of finding that shining diamond.

Quite possible that people will come up with a solution eventually. Like Samizdat was a solution to censorship and a broken publishing system in USSR.

by myth_drannon

3/17/2026 at 10:46:42 AM

A bit off topic, but I noticed I hardly ever use search anymore. It's just google.com/ai in 99% of cases. I believe in the future, search engines must go in this direction ..

by apples_oranges

3/18/2026 at 4:14:31 PM

I don't know... It doesn't look very "small" to me. I "next post"ed a few, and most of them ended up being just some typical tech bro blog talking about boring tech.

But I did eventually stumble upon a post about two corgis, and another about medieval Europe...thingy. So it's not all bad.

by MetroWind

3/18/2026 at 6:55:41 AM

I tried kagi a year or so ago and and instantly cancelled my sub and asked for a refund, which they granted. The results for every search was jammed with AI and "listicles" and all this shit that made the results essentially impossible to parse for me, and I'm supposed to pay for the pleasure. Hard pass.

by sointeresting

3/17/2026 at 4:06:31 PM

[dead]

by leontloveless

3/17/2026 at 3:00:22 PM

[dead]

by devcraft_ai

3/17/2026 at 9:25:50 PM

[flagged]

by wei03288

3/17/2026 at 10:49:09 AM

Kagi wants to exist in a world that doesn't need it anymore

by WhereIsTheTruth

3/17/2026 at 11:08:27 AM

We can create worlds, not just inhabit ones created by corporations.

by freetonik

3/17/2026 at 11:24:26 AM

Kagi is a for-profit corporation.

by criley2