3/14/2026 at 10:07:36 PM
Posting a product on any of these sites will not have the same impact as it did before AI. Not because your product is not good, but because there is much more noise now.This applies to social media posting, SEO, articles, you name it. AI has amplified the noise to the point where finding something useful is pretty hard now.
Building in public is and was always a fake trend. You see a few who made it a long time ago by posting their journey (personal choice), and then everyone jumps in to spam, which is back again to the noise, ending with a lack of value.
I feel for anyone trying to take a product to the market right now, while there are more tools to build, marketing has gotten a lot harder, consumers are struggling financially, and companies are trying to stay afloat due to a lack of growth.
by Oras
3/15/2026 at 4:14:24 AM
It did not work even before AI. The rise of "indie hacking" in the late 2010s brought in thousands of hustlers creating similar lists, and many of them were simply selling shovels to other indie hackers (including the lists themselves). By the time of the pandemic, the "submit to every directory & community" strategy was already useless.by ivm
3/15/2026 at 9:23:14 AM
I've been creating and marketing software as an indie developer for over 20 years now, and the marketing part definitely feels harder than it use to. See also:https://successfulsoftware.net/2025/12/22/is-the-golden-age-...
by hermitcrab
3/14/2026 at 10:25:00 PM
True story, yesterday I tried to get some feedback from an industry relevant subreddit for a real estate quick check calculation tool (automatically extracts listing data into calculation and enables sharing investment ideas). The pure mention of AI brought up a whole crowd of fed up bullies that talked it down as vibecoding trash - which it really isn't. All those places are flooded.by thorio
3/15/2026 at 2:59:11 AM
People, not bullies. I can sympathize with you because I've struggled with the same, but we can't blame those people. They're now being asked every two days to give feedback on yet another tool. That used to be once every 6 months. And the overwhelming majority of those new "tools" is abandoned within a month. And there is indeed a huge amount of vibecoded slop. I've put more time and thought into our product than the last 20 such tools that got posted into our industry-relevant subreddit combined, but I can't expect the mods and users to put their time into assessing that.by deaux
3/15/2026 at 10:52:00 AM
I think it’s strange to dislike vibe coded things. I’ve seen a lot of cool stuff that’s mostly vibe coded. fomo.nyc for example. The problem is mostly the intention. I think a lot of vibe coded stuff isn’t solving a problem someone has its someone trying to seek profit. It’s no different from when smartphones first came out and people wanted to make a for everything when most of them didn’t solve any problems. The difference is nobody is wowed anymore by anything so your app that turns your phone into a beer kind of thing doesn’t exist in the vibe coded world.by mnky9800n
3/16/2026 at 1:34:13 AM
> I’ve seen a lot of cool stuff that’s mostly vibe coded. fomo.nyc for example.Maybe because you're not an actibe member of one of those fields whose subreddits now gets these vibecoded tools every other day. Because for those, I can tell you that the overwhelming majority isn't cool. Even when they are trying to solve a problem and aren't (yet) seeking a profit. They have very little time, energy and thought put into them. They're made by people who are passers-by, who aren't personally invested and often haven't experienced the problem first-hand; it's just a problem they heard about, or assumed would exist. And that leads to things that are a waste of time. Often they have blatantly obvious problems that show they didn't even QA it for an hour.
by deaux
3/15/2026 at 7:49:12 AM
While this is directionally correct it does come down to a tonality, that I think wasn't justified in that case. But hey, it's the Internet and I'm not naive either.by thorio
3/16/2026 at 2:05:32 AM
I'm saying that the tonality is justified due to all of the other slop. You and me are simply the unavoidable casualties.I'm saying this while in a field that's even more anti-AI/tools than yours, FWIW. By virtue of anything that mentions AI - and much of the tools that don't even mention it but are suspected - getting auto-removed by automod on the subreddit. There's only one subreddit in our field, everyone's on it, and it blanket bans anything with AI, despite the best tools out there incoporating it.
It's not even something like art, design, coding and so on where people are scared of job loss or even hobby loss, it's nothing like that at all for the community. I do suspect the mods' friends might feel threatened, as they _do_ make a living off of the community, but in our case I don't even think that's their primary reason to blanket ban it.
by deaux
3/15/2026 at 2:37:21 AM
Yes but your content is also part of the floodby owebmaster
3/15/2026 at 7:46:54 AM
While that's true, my tool (as part of the flood) didn't originate from the same spring, it's just something I happen to be building that same way, I did before the LLM wave. It's not vibecoded SaaS fast food.I checked community guidelines before and think regarding Reddit, this is where it should be resolve in my option.
by thorio
3/15/2026 at 10:48:55 AM
Unfortunately the source doesn't matter when there so much. It is really hard to differentiate things when you are inundated. Did you try a Show HN here? It requires more luck than ever because of the same problem, but worth a try. I'll take an honest look if you do it (though hard to say if I am the target market).by mchaver
3/15/2026 at 7:37:17 PM
Had basically the same thing happen. Posted in a side project sub, spam filter nuked it because new account. And in other subs now, anything that mentions AI gets hit with "vibecoded slop" automatically. Doesn't matter if you spent months on it.What actually moved the needle was talking about data, not the product. I posted about my tool — crickets. Then I wrote about stuff I discovered while building it and people started engaging. Exact same product behind both posts, just "here's what I found" instead of "here's what I built." Night and day difference.
by Andrei_dev
3/15/2026 at 8:32:43 AM
The producthunt noise was a thing on day 1 I feel like, I quickly stopped checking that website after they launchedby baby
3/15/2026 at 8:59:11 AM
Can confirm this from direct experience. I spent 3 weeks doing everything on the checklist Product Hunt launch, daily X posts, shared in communities with 250k members, cold DMs, directories. Result was literally zero signups. Not low, zero. The noise level is so high now that the standard playbook just doesn't work for indie developers anymore. What finally started getting real feedback was asking genuine questions in relevant subreddits instead of promoting actual conversations instead of broadcasts.by nvardakas
3/15/2026 at 9:40:33 AM
Can you share what approach you’re taking for this? I’ve tried engaging in a similar way but struggled to strike a balance between helping for the sake of helping (no return for me), and asking research-focused questions, with people not caring too much about to answerby frabia
3/16/2026 at 8:52:21 AM
Honestly I'm still figuring it out. The main shift was stopping all the broadcast stuff tweets, directory submissions, cold DMs and just going to where people already talk about the problem I'm solving. I ask open ended questions without linking anything. If what I'm building is actually useful, people describe the pain themselves and sometimes ask what I'm working on. The conversion is way lower volume but the conversations are real. The hard part is patience it feels like you're doing nothing compared to the dopamine of posting a launch.by nvardakas
3/15/2026 at 9:18:48 PM
the law of shitty click-throughs strikes againby iovrthoughtthis
3/15/2026 at 9:33:15 AM
[flagged]by Sohazur
3/15/2026 at 11:58:04 AM
Whilst this is a very valid view, I am not sure there is evidence for it, if you have it please do provide it.It is not obvious to me that one credible citation is better than having appeared many times in the training data.
Also knowledge releases of models are too slow to be depended on for marketing in my view. It is the search / retrieval of LLMs for which one can optimise.
A final point would be that none of this changes the point made, which is that there too much noise due to too many products being shipped.
by dennisy
3/15/2026 at 11:32:25 AM
AIs recommend what is most popular/well-known, which isn’t necessarily what is best. Both your description of AI sourcing and your AI-written comment demonstrate this point.by baubino
3/15/2026 at 10:46:28 AM
Please do not post AI slop here.by arkadiytehgraet
3/15/2026 at 11:50:58 AM
It’s also against the rules now too. I wish there were a report button.by edot
3/15/2026 at 2:57:45 PM
Isn't that what the "flag" option is for?by probably_wrong
3/15/2026 at 5:26:59 PM
kind of hidden. they should make it more prominent now .by dominotw
3/15/2026 at 11:59:06 AM
How did you guess it was AI slop? I read it and answered before seeing your comment :)by dennisy
3/15/2026 at 12:50:08 PM
X is not Y — it’s Z.Because: - A: … - B: …
by yks