alt.hn

3/1/2026 at 6:41:24 AM

Ask HN: How do we solve the bot flooding problem without destroying anonymity?

by txrx0000

3/1/2026 at 6:13:46 PM

My mind goes to simple solutions like established communities having a $1 entry fee, for privacy use a privacy crypto maybe but that's a decent amount of friction for average folk with the current UX.

Another interesting idea that comes to mind is that every post/comment made needs the user to physically use their fingerprint scanner on their device which I assume plenty of devices have already. As long ad it can't be spoofed it works but not sure about the details about reliably securing that.

It would be some friction but I feel like it would be fine?

by youniverse

3/1/2026 at 8:16:37 PM

A lot of devices have fingerprint scanners and faceID. But it isn't used by everybody.

I haven't used it since 2017.

by tremarley

3/1/2026 at 9:53:27 AM

The biggest signal I have noticed over time is consistency, not just one good post. Accounts that participate normally for weeks build a kind of trust naturally. Maybe weighting activity history more than identity verification could help without hurting anonymity.

by allinonetools_

3/1/2026 at 10:33:18 AM

Creates echo chambers, karma whoring 'power' accounts, rewards ego-posting and generally makes the experience about who says what not what is said. Worsens the problem.

by throwaway5465

3/1/2026 at 2:18:04 PM

Echo chambers exist no matter what & "who says what" is an essential aspect of determining transferrable credibility.

Without transferrable credibility, any ratings system simply becomes a question of which side spams the most.

by judahmeek

3/1/2026 at 8:44:50 AM

One issue I keep noticing is that most anti-bot systems optimize for blocking instead of increasing friction progressively.

Rate limits tied to behavioral patterns rather than identity seem to work better — especially interaction timing, navigation flow, or session consistency.

We experimented with something similar while building HiveHQ and found bots usually fail when systems require small contextual actions humans do naturally.

by fernando_campos

3/1/2026 at 2:12:21 PM

So... use advanced pattern matching to determine human patterns & reject outliers?

Interaction timing is like rate limiting, but more granular

Navigation flow is a basically requiring bots to use a headless browser instead of API's

What does session consistency mean in this context? Restricting to a limited number of interests & activity times?

by judahmeek

3/1/2026 at 9:24:11 AM

could solve bot flooding by raising the cost of automation, not by removing anonymity. Techniques like behavioral detection, rate limiting, proof‑of‑work, reputation systems, and AI‑based anomaly detection can filter bots without requiring real‑world identity. The goal isn’t to know who you are — it’s to know whether you’re human.

by bruceyao1984

3/1/2026 at 6:21:52 PM

One of my least favorite patterns online: sites that decide that I’m a bot because I open a whole bunch of tabs in the space of 15 seconds with the products I want to evaluate or articles I want to read.

by apothegm

3/1/2026 at 10:35:27 AM

Haven't noticed any negative changes.

by chistev

3/1/2026 at 3:40:26 PM

OP, you're on the right track.

The question you need to ask yourself is "What's the end game?"

What happens when users' feeds are full of users that they already know?

You think they'll be satisfied with that?

by judahmeek

3/1/2026 at 7:49:22 AM

make spamming illegal give severe punishments and enforce the law

by drsalt

3/1/2026 at 2:55:56 PM

There is no way to solve it without going to tribalism.

Bots and AI right now as good as the "average" joe.

All the places that can move the perception of real people about products, politics or any form of power will and is being flooded with bots.

The reason for the "ID" on internet is not because of the children. But because the bots are soo good they need to use ID to filter what is bot or not. Avoiding the dead internet.

The powers that be NEED to sway perception and narrative to their liking.

think about the children! Epstein list, patriot act, etc.

by hash07e

3/1/2026 at 7:08:59 PM

[dead]

by solarisos