alt.hn

2/27/2026 at 9:40:40 PM

President Trump bans Anthropic from use in government systems

 https://www.npr.org/2026/02/27/nx-s1-5729118/trump-anthropic-pentagon-openai-ai-weapons-ban

by pkress2

2/27/2026 at 10:14:31 PM

This might actually make Anthropic very popular among those who do not support the current US presidency, a significant market share.

by paozac

2/28/2026 at 3:31:57 AM

For the last couple of months all the top models have been from the US. I don't expect that to last - or even if it does the gap will gradually diminish to the point that "top" is largely irrelevant outside of marketing.

But at the moment I must use a US model for the best results for complex queries. So I'm glad that there's one company I'm at least somewhat ok with supporting. I'm not even that picky. All I want is a reasonable guarantee that I'm not supporting a company who's tools are used for autonomous drone warfare in American wars, and a few other basic things like that.

I guess someone might feel moved to respond to this by pointing out all the other companies outside of AI that I should be avoiding too. Please do! I'm actively trying to be more mindful of the companies I support rather than just chasing the lowest bills. I'm in the process of migrating my company away from MS 365 to Nextcloud on Hetzner, which is going slow but well.

by esperent

2/28/2026 at 11:19:28 AM

> For the last couple of months all the top models have been from the US

The commenter you responded said presidency not country. There are multiple parties and possibilities here.

by re-thc

2/27/2026 at 10:21:48 PM

Take notes other AI companies. This is a totally fine line to draw and it's not even that high bar.

Dont allow systems to be built with your AI that automate mass surveillance or automate kill decisions.

by smalltorch

2/28/2026 at 3:38:46 AM

The disappointing this is someone _will_ do it, you know it’s going to happen.

by monkpit

2/28/2026 at 8:57:13 AM

Someone? You say it like it's unknown that OpenAI got the contract

by ffsm8

2/28/2026 at 5:10:00 PM

I meant in the general sense - you could have all the major players take a moral stance and say “no” but someone would say yes eventually.

by monkpit

2/28/2026 at 5:50:55 AM

> Dont allow systems to be built with your AI

those systems will be built regardless. That type of boycott being asked from companies is essentially asking companies to not make profit where there's profit to be made, when those doing the asking is not also taking in any sacrifices for this boycott.

Instead of asking companies to be altruistic, those wanting such systems to be illegal should be using the civic system we have today to make it so - yes, this costs effort, resources and time. Like all hard things.

by chii

2/28/2026 at 6:01:19 AM

The thing is, other companies can pick up that slack. Heck even distillation attacks against claude can be used to create such models

by LarsDu88

2/28/2026 at 6:05:49 AM

With the price of tokens I think mass surveillance with AI is not a realistic use case.

There already is a mass surveillance. Presumably most electronic communication is monitored. I guess LLMs can likely do a somewhat better job but probably not worth the cost for the marginal benefit over existing technologies?

Similarly for "Terminators" or other AI killing machines... Isn't it cheaper to use a human? We have autonomous weapons already, like cruise missiles... Other than the movies what does a reality with LLMs pulling triggers look like? Cars are also "killing machines" and we're letting computers drive them...

Unfortunately if these things do start making sense for whatever reason they're probably going to happen. Private companies in general have no way to prevent their technology from being used for "defense" applications. Once that genie is out of the bottle it's not going back in.

by YZF

2/27/2026 at 11:58:46 PM

My first thought here was that Anthropic just became the first call for Europe to discuss AI services and infrastructure.

I wonder if a US company has ever wholesale emigrated before?

by j_bizzle

2/28/2026 at 5:18:28 AM

Europe is not particularly anti surveillance

by john-h-k

2/28/2026 at 6:24:52 AM

Actually the EU passed an AI act back in 2024 that tackles that.

by EagnaIonat

2/28/2026 at 3:54:39 AM

Please note that mass surveillance of Europeans is fine from Anthropic's statement.

by Aperocky

2/28/2026 at 5:38:14 AM

Yeah it's a shitty statement "we're totally fine accidently targeting foreigners but come on, not 'mericans" because it's well known that once you have the capability it will be aimed at everyone anyway.

by riffraff

2/28/2026 at 6:56:51 PM

Folks; there isn't a geopolity agnostic equivalent of incorporation. There is no Anthropic without that grant of incorporation. Even if they wanted to take the most principled stance, they can only push so far, and to have a system that is incompatible with operating a mass surveillance network, it has to be capable of monitoring itself to recognize whether it has been configured in such a way as it's activity is aligned to the activity of mass surveillance. You'd have to build the mass surveillance oracle, which is in and of itself, a mass surveillance machine.

by salawat

2/28/2026 at 5:33:26 AM

It's called political correctness. There is a longstanding undercurrent in American politics of treating Constitutional rights (aka natural rights) as only applicable to Americans [0]. Framing the issue in terms of lofty universal ideals would be politically suicidal. And with the current precarious situation, giving more energy to overly-simplistic jingoist chants is not what anybody needs.

[0] this seems to be a bit of proto-fascism that helped set the stage for the overt dynamic we've now got

by mindslight

2/28/2026 at 5:56:48 AM

Claude Code seems to be the best at programming right now. I think if Anthropic can maintain or increase their lead they'll have no shortage of customers. I imagine Anthropic's business is driven by business customers rather than individual paying customers at this point.

by YZF

2/28/2026 at 6:20:51 AM

It’s the best at everything. OpenAI models are dangerously stupid enough as it is. Not much can phase me these days, but a sycophantic ChatGPT in a kill chain is nightmare fuel.

by braebo

2/28/2026 at 2:27:19 AM

Personally, I removed ChatGPT from my phone for Claude last week. This reenforces my choice.

by jsbisviewtiful

2/28/2026 at 11:25:30 AM

It probably boosts their reputation with one segment of the market while making them much less attractive to another (just my thoughts)

by ErigmolCt

2/28/2026 at 12:04:04 PM

And one of those segments is about 50% of the US population, and the other is about 50% of the US population + the rest of the world.

Source: A Norwegian that just cancelled his ChatGPT plus subscription and will consider Gemini or Claude instead.

by kivle

2/28/2026 at 5:54:11 AM

They got at least one more subscriber as of about twenty minutes ago since I just canceled my ChatGPT Pro subscription and moved to Anthropic.

Sam Altman immediately capitulating to the Trump administration after bragging like four hours ago about he wouldn't shows a distinct lack of integrity. It's not like ChatGPT is categorically better than Claude, I just didn't bother change to Claude before purely out of my previous inertia with ChatGPT.

by tombert

2/28/2026 at 5:31:47 AM

Europe is a great market. To be fair, given Dario’s nationality, we should make a massive offer for Anthropic to relocate somewhere in Europe like San Marino or such. Levying taxes and letting them have all they need. (Joking, but to a point)

by camillomiller

2/28/2026 at 4:40:57 AM

Does Anthropic make money yet, or like a lot of AI are they selling dollars for fifty cents each? Can they keep going without a lot of investment from administration-aligned oligarchs like the Saudis, or without these circular stock-for-compute deals?

by api

2/28/2026 at 7:13:49 AM

Is it weird that out a failed negotiation, there is a threat against a private entity publicly?

Isn't it supposed to be freedom of something? Does this trigger any laws or something? Just for curiosity sake

by motbus3

2/28/2026 at 7:41:37 AM

> Isn't it supposed to be freedom of something?

Oh, you fell for the ads

by croes

2/28/2026 at 4:21:33 PM

To be fair. This level of weirdness is not seen since the 60s/70s

by motbus3

3/1/2026 at 9:31:17 PM

Its been there but its just been less public. The CEO of Qwest was ousted/and sent to prison because he refused to allow the government to tap all of their phone systems for NSA mass surveillance. This was like 25 years ago.

by olyjohn

2/27/2026 at 10:19:48 PM

So, after all is done and dust has settled, Anthropic will be the only big'ish tech company that not sold it soul to devil.

by mclean

2/28/2026 at 11:31:56 AM

"Didn't sell its soul" is a pretty high bar for any large AI lab taking government and enterprise money

by ErigmolCt

2/27/2026 at 10:33:08 PM

optimistic. This just means they'll demand a higher price.

by cyanydeez

2/28/2026 at 5:14:58 AM

As far as I understand, this is about banning the use of Anthropic for autonomous weapons and domestic surveillance. And while the idea of building one fully controlled, nationwide AI system may sound tempting, in reality it’s still just a fantasy and wouldn’t be very useful in practice.

by gormen

2/28/2026 at 9:07:40 AM

No, Anthropic did not want Claude to be used for autonomous weapons and domestic surveillance, in response to which the Department of Defense banned them from every defense use

edit: Disregard the above, do I take my car or walk to a car wash 50m away

by tefkah

2/28/2026 at 11:29:47 AM

Nott really, the dispute is that Anthropic wanted to keep restrictions against domestic mass surveillance and fully autonomous weapons, while the Pentagon reportedly wanted the models available for any "lawful" use

by ErigmolCt

2/27/2026 at 9:51:43 PM

Imagine if a private company had developed the nuclear bomb, and said in its terms "This can never be used as a first strike weapon and must only be used as a retaliation against imminent existential attacks on the US homeland". I think a lot of people would have lauded the attempt by a weapon's creators to restrain the destructive potential of their creation.

Separately:

An opinion piece in the NYT suggested that Anthropic should not have restrictions and that "lawful use" provision should properly constrain the government. The fact that we have to hope Anthropic holds to their commitment is a show of no-confidence in the rule of law and the legislature of the United States to protect the people.

Seriously. All they said was "don't do mass surveillance and don't create autonomous killbots" and the president literally frames it as "Anthropic vs. the Constitution" and calls them woke radicals. How any citizen doesn't immediately have their stomach churning is beyond me.

Oh wait, out of [Fox, WSJ, NYT, WaPo, NPR, Newsmax] only Fox doesn't have an article up about it, and Newsmax left out the part about domestic mass surveillance. I am shocked!

by unethical_ban

2/27/2026 at 10:07:58 PM

At this point I'm starting to wonder if the US military has only served to make my life worse, as an American. During my lifetime.

by Computer0

2/27/2026 at 10:22:37 PM

The rest of the world: First time?

by lioeters

2/28/2026 at 1:23:41 AM

Were Bosnia (1992) and Serbia (1999) before your time?

by Sabinus

2/28/2026 at 5:31:48 AM

Please be more specific about your point.

by unethical_ban

2/28/2026 at 7:59:35 AM

The corporation styling itself as "the department of war" is only as powerful as the technology it can command. It's hilarious to see the likes of Trump and Hegseth complain about Big Tech strongarming them while they are begging like dogs to get access to technology their kind wouldn't be able to create in a thousand years.

Reminds me of that scene in the dark knight when Bane says "Do you feel in charge?". Well do you, Pete? Why should Pete Hegseth be in charge of anything? "Department of war" lol. These punks need to step aside and let the adults take over for the good of humanity.

Props to Anthropic for standing their ground and not getting bullied by their inferiors. You earned a lot of respect today.

Props to OpenAI for being slick and playing the game, hopefully they can take control of this decaying corpse from the inside and transform it into something better.

by glerk

2/27/2026 at 10:28:55 PM

Something interesting is going on around Trump's rants. Some White House staffers are directing lower-level staff to ignore them and focus on the economy. James Blair [2] seems to be leading this. Blair was in charge of political strategy for Trump's campaign, and he won, so he's probably not going to be fired.

There have been presidents in decline who were semi-captured by their staffs. Biden, Reagan, and Roosevelt all were. It may be that Trump gets trotted out now and then to deliver his standard speech (his speeches all have roughly the same content, regardless of subject or venue), but the work of the White House involves him less.

Watch to see which threats get followed up with action, and which ones don't.

[1] https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/2026/02/trump-gop-repub...

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Blair_(political_advisor...

by Animats

2/28/2026 at 4:06:53 AM

Yeah, then they can start using the auto pen to sign the orders and legislation right?

by rezonant

2/27/2026 at 9:18:42 PM

Might be the best thing to happen to Anthropic from a PR perspective and possibly IPO.

by lvl155

2/27/2026 at 10:20:51 PM

That depends on how aggressively the current administration follows through on the threats to punish them. The SEC could deny IPO registration, for example.

by AlotOfReading

2/27/2026 at 11:22:00 PM

Given the waning influence of American economic hegemony, this threat looks to be less impactful as time goes on. A stick that is shrinking can still be painful; it will be an interesting decision for the company's directors to make.

by edmundsauto

2/28/2026 at 11:36:19 AM

Good press is helpful, but public investors also care about regulatory risk

by ErigmolCt

2/27/2026 at 10:38:29 PM

That's a solid gold recommendation for Anthropic, far as I'm concerned.

by drivingmenuts

2/28/2026 at 11:23:50 AM

This feels bad for the industry. If every AI company learns that having explicit red lines gets you blacklisted, the incentive is to keep safety language vague and negotiable

by ErigmolCt

2/27/2026 at 10:20:42 PM

Is this as real as the Ai generated medical ship that is steaming towards Greenland as we speak?

by blitzar

2/27/2026 at 10:49:28 PM

Please, Anthropic, make 30 second commercials about this dispute!

Not a hard sell, but just "These are the two demands the government gave us, and here's why we did not agree to them"

It makes the company so attractive to most of the public - not just those who dislike Trump, but also those don't trust government.

by thomassmith65

2/27/2026 at 9:04:40 PM

Truth social post: https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/1161445529692...

Six-month phase out period, that's something. I guess the DoW's been using Claude quite a bit.

by underdeserver

2/27/2026 at 9:56:37 PM

Despite the complete Archie Bunker energy in that post here is something interesting from the post:

"Anthropic better get their act together, and be helpful during this phase out period, or I will use the Full Power of the Presidency to make them comply, with major civil and criminal consequences to follow."

with major civil and criminal consequences to follow.

WTF !!!

by johnbarron

2/28/2026 at 4:52:08 AM

He's worried he might need Anthropic to steal the midterms.

by rapind

2/28/2026 at 2:17:38 AM

I’d love to get the reaction if all the VC investors who “reluctantly” had to support Trump because Lina Kahn was just too meddlesome, and they had to support a candidate who would be hands off with big tech.

by atourgates

2/28/2026 at 4:03:50 AM

Leopards, faces

by rezonant

2/28/2026 at 3:51:08 AM

TACO, right? Six whole months to not actually phase anything out. And the orange brat just retrenched at a revised and more impotent threat.

by mindslight

2/27/2026 at 10:41:26 PM

That was in the cards since Hegseth's initial announcement, when he brandished the option for Anthropic to be put on the same level as China and Russia, i.e. the same level as State enemies of the US. Got to give it tho Anthropic's CEO, I had first though that he'd give in faster, looks like he's still clinging on.

Also see what happened to Joseph Nacchio in the early 2000s [1]:

> He was convicted of 19 counts of insider trading in Qwest stock on April 19, 2007[2] – charges his defense team claimed were U.S. government retaliation for his refusal to give customer data to the National Security Agency in February, 2001.

Unfortunately, I think the same thing is in the cards now for Anthropic's CEO, that is if he doesn't choose to play ball.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Nacchio

by paganel

2/27/2026 at 11:20:45 PM

The part of Dario's response I found funniest was pointing out the inherent contradiction in the DoW threats. Somehow, they could both be a national security threat as well as a national security necessity. Not by doing something differently - at the same time, to the same people, in the same context.

by edmundsauto

2/28/2026 at 3:12:09 AM

They won’t be brandished as a supply chain risk because the supply chain members are good at lobbying and they like Claude.

As an example, Amazon is a defense contractor and uses Claude heavily internally for development. They are also major investors in Anthropic. Amazon would not want Claude to be banned from use on developing AWS services that may be cross sold to the government. Multiply this by every defense company that uses Claude (eg anduril and Palantir).

They could totally try and punish Anthropic executives of course. That seems likely.

by vineyardmike

2/28/2026 at 3:10:59 AM

This shouldn't surprise anybody at this point. This is how Trump behaves on a daily basis. He thinks that he can direct the federal government to do literally anything he wants and operates on pure retribution.

So many people wrote think pieces about how Trump couldn't possibly be a fascist because fascism involves state takeover of corporate power. Hm...

by UncleMeat

2/28/2026 at 12:11:48 AM

I am honestly surprised he is being this nice given he could use the war powers act and eminent domain to just seize the company and conscript their employees. I am sure someone will say that is not legal but when has that stopped anyone.

What I don't get is why they really want it. I can't think of a worse platform in general to do anything with combat that is, anything in a data-center. I would take the Quake 3 Arena engine on a new ultra insane mode combined with a tiny self hosted model to detect humans, uniforms, vehicle make and model plus a simple Friend or Foe over all the big AI platforms any day. Add an optional feed from an encrypted meshtastic like network to sync nodes using pre-defined Ostiary like commands. Ultra-fast, light-weight on all resources, decentralized.

The enemy could neutralize all the big platforms in one day by simply activating a few dozen of the sleeper agents in the US or a couple High-Altitude Electromagnetic Pulse (HEMP) deployed by a few stratospheric balloons as China flew over every major military installation in the US. Adding to this having a network dependency to the big platforms from autonomous weapons is an extreme vulnerability. Any design that depends on a central command is a single point of success.

by Bender

2/28/2026 at 3:11:38 AM

> I am sure someone will say that is not legal but when has that stopped anyone.

it has routinely stopped them as the courts have already struck down countless of nonsense by this administration, and they rely exactly on this bluster every time they try something else.

The issue is that even though courts work slower than a president with a smartphone eventually it will all get sorted out and they know this, which is why some people falling for this shock and awe behavior is so silly.

by Barrin92

2/28/2026 at 3:19:56 AM

The issue is that even though courts work slower than a president

So ... not stopped the president. Make a move, eventually ruled naughty, shift to another move, ruled a no-no, take an alternate path, rinse repeat. How does one fix the courts or is it working as intended?

by Bender

2/28/2026 at 4:04:51 AM

He simply ignores the courts.

by rezonant

2/28/2026 at 7:49:24 AM

He just changes the law he uses as justification and does the same as before. The Gish gallop of law

by croes

2/28/2026 at 5:16:53 AM

Claude is the best of these models/services out there in my experience so far, so no surprise there. It's a company with leadership that hold principals they stand up for -- huge disappointment to see the government going out of it's way to hurt it. So bizarre, and deeply anti-American.

Too bad government devs will have a much harder time using some of the best tools out there.

by liamgriffiths

2/27/2026 at 10:06:13 PM

This is the happy ending.

by zmj

2/27/2026 at 10:08:50 PM

I'm worried about who will rush in to fill the vacuum.

by ortusdux

2/27/2026 at 10:18:26 PM

I'm sure Alex Karp and Palantir are already charging into the breach, promising to deliver things they don't have the capability to deliver! (Otherwise known as just another day for them)

by stdgy

2/28/2026 at 3:24:48 PM

It was Altman. Papers have been signed.

by nickthegreek

2/27/2026 at 11:14:36 PM

No end here. The administration can still go above and beyond in an attempt to completely wreck Anthropic.

by skeledrew

2/28/2026 at 2:18:31 AM

Could you expand on this? What mechanism? Any examples?

by nomel

2/28/2026 at 2:26:01 AM

The state has unlimited resources to wreck you and I am not sure many people have faith in the US's judicial system to keep them in check.

This will be a death by thousand cuts.

by swat535

2/28/2026 at 4:14:09 AM

I would think it pretty clear that they aren't shy about making their displeasure loudly and concretely known when denied. I can imagine an executive order in the research or draft state that'll make it so any entity that continues to deal with Anthropic is automatically put at a disadvantage. Something similar in spirit and effect to the sanctions on Cuba.

by skeledrew

2/27/2026 at 10:22:25 PM

No, Trump added "I will use the full power of the presidency to make them comply".

by simlevesque

2/27/2026 at 10:09:42 PM

[dead]

by belter

2/27/2026 at 10:09:40 PM

Earlier: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47185528

by ChrisArchitect

2/27/2026 at 10:12:16 PM

There are a bunch of submissions on the story (with a few different sources), some with 15+ points, none appeared on the front page.

I think we'll see many many dupes. Hopefully the comment threads will be merged eventually.

by senko

2/28/2026 at 12:33:00 AM

They will, usually rapidly, if you email the mods! (Footer contact link.) Otherwise, they might or might not be, depending on coincidences and such.

by altairprime

2/28/2026 at 4:19:53 AM

Why the fuck does the president have authority to set specific IT policy for the government. He might not even have it, he loves making policies he doesn’t actually have the authority to make.

by anon7000

2/28/2026 at 4:31:24 AM

Because the POTUS is the chief executive. His literal job is to manage the executive branch of the government. Unless his policies go against the law, there isn't anyone who can legally dispute his policies for the executive. And if he does something illegal, the Senate can impeach him.

At least, so goes the theory.

by MarsIronPI

2/28/2026 at 4:29:57 AM

Who else should have that authority?

by JuniperMesos

2/28/2026 at 5:10:49 AM

Congress

by bonsai_spool

2/28/2026 at 5:06:00 AM

Unlike Europe, the USA is not a technocracy. If you want to learn more about the 3 branches of government and the scope of their powers, ask your AI.

by politician

2/27/2026 at 9:14:02 PM

The next question, what person wants to send all their personal questions to an AI lab that will help the government do domestic surveillance

by loss_flow

2/28/2026 at 2:28:25 AM

You could ask this about every user of every large cloud service provider, which is why they all refuses to implement E2E, or store the keys [4].

The government has their hands in all of them, using "national security" as the justification, with threats if they don't comply [1][2], with the alternative being to shut down [3].

Does it prevent harm? Probably.

[1] https://sg.news.yahoo.com/yahoo-ceo-fears-defying-nsa-could-...

[2] https://lieu.house.gov/media-center/in-the-news/report-yahoo...

[3] https://www.crn.com/news/security/240159745/two-email-provid...

[4] https://www.forbes.com/sites/thomasbrewster/2026/01/22/micro...

by nomel

2/28/2026 at 3:50:45 AM

This shouldn't be understated.

Also, implicit in the government's requirements is that they require mass domestic surveillance capabilities. Imagine a large government tool that for each citizen there is an antagonist OpenClaw-like set of agents surveilling and potentially acting against every public interaction and occasionally hallucinating.

by bickfordb

2/27/2026 at 9:17:25 PM

The same type of people who would upload a picture of their "friends" and tell the AI to "roast" them or take off their clothes.

by mekdoonggi

2/27/2026 at 10:10:27 PM

Is this not a greater loss for the government than for Anthropic?

by tapvt

2/27/2026 at 10:14:56 PM

I guess Sama is happy.

Also I wonder what's happening with democracy in the US, with this level of presidential control to mess up everything, is US moving towards dictatorship?

by throwaw12

2/27/2026 at 10:16:46 PM

Are you seriously still asking this question ?

by bestouff

2/27/2026 at 10:26:15 PM

I'm starting to think this guy is kind of a jerk.

by lioeters

2/27/2026 at 11:29:44 PM

"The more I hear about this [Hitler] guy, the less I care for him" - Norm MacDonald

by HaZeust

2/28/2026 at 3:40:32 AM

On the plus side, gas and groceries are reportedly cheaper than ever, with the highest job counts and everyone being beautifully happy!

by Freedom2

2/27/2026 at 10:20:19 PM

You cant be serious. We are well past democracy and deep into fascism. Ask yourself, how many of the 14 points do you recognize?

https://ratical.org/ratville/CAH/fasci14chars.html

by frogperson

2/27/2026 at 10:36:28 PM

Oh the US crossed that threshold the day he started he won the elections the second time. Most Americans seem to think new elections will solve it. But for germans it was a world war that brought back democracy. There were no elections anymore. That is also the most likely case for the US now.

by RonanSoleste

2/27/2026 at 10:26:07 PM

You might be right, I am getting worried more and more for upcoming 2039-2045 years

by throwaw12

2/28/2026 at 12:15:51 AM

I'm counting 12.

by JKCalhoun

2/27/2026 at 10:37:44 PM

Not saying that you are wrong. But even before Trump the US ticked like 10/14.

by maxwellsdeamons

2/27/2026 at 10:18:26 PM

The puppet does what the puppeteer makes it do.

by cluckindan

2/27/2026 at 10:24:37 PM

The US will survive this, despite being damaged, because Trump and his team are incompetent and he’s in a bubble and no one tells him what is actually going on. The GOP is going to get crushed in the midterms. From that standpoint, Anthropic may simply be playing the long game, and playing it well.

by adriand

2/27/2026 at 10:32:38 PM

Really hope so. Only concern is what desperate measures the Trump admin will be willing to employ to stop the midterms from giving Democrats control of Congress (or at least the House).

by goatlover

2/27/2026 at 10:17:28 PM

Probably war.

by cue_the_strings

2/27/2026 at 10:20:01 PM

> Also I wonder what's happening with democracy in the US, with this level of presidential control to mess up everything, is US moving towards dictatorship?

I mean maybe, but not because the president can decide to cancel a contract with a vendor. That seems to be a pretty reasonable power for the president to have.

by palmotea

2/28/2026 at 2:28:05 AM

Soon US gov can takeover anthropic and you can't do anything

by jayshah5696

2/28/2026 at 4:08:54 AM

Good fucking on anthropic, I've long held that they seem like the AI company best handling existential risk, and this elevates that opinion. If you don't want terminator, not helping people invent terminator is a good first step.

by ViscountPenguin

2/27/2026 at 10:23:22 PM

So the government is phasing them out, or the company needs to get their act together?

Rarely see a company tell the government no though.

by tayo42

2/27/2026 at 10:05:19 PM

(1603ET): An hour before a 5PM ET deadline, President Donald Trump directed 'EVERY Federal Agency in the United States Government to IMMEDIATELY CEASE all use of Anthropic’s technology," posting on Truth Social that "We don't need it, we don't want it, and we will not do business with them again."

by anonym29

2/27/2026 at 9:14:42 PM

Now will OpenAI have the same limits? LMAO at the US Government having to go with a Chinese open-source model...

by readitalready

2/27/2026 at 10:26:18 PM

I have a feeling they will end up going with grok.

by SonOfKyuss

2/27/2026 at 10:33:02 PM

They'll probably try, but the problem is everyone actually using these models knows Grok sucks: [0].

> Demand from other agencies to use Grok has been anemic, people familiar with the matter said, except in a few cases where people wanted to use it to mimic a bad actor for defensive testing.

[0]: https://www.wsj.com/politics/national-security/elon-musk-xai...?

by Analemma_

2/27/2026 at 10:36:13 PM

February 23, 2026: The Pentagon confirmed a new agreement allowing Grok use in classified systems. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced it would go live soon on unclassified and classified networks, alongside other models, as part of feeding military data into AI.

Elon mentioned they will be releasing a cli coding tool for grok similar to Claude Code, will be interesting to see how it performs given they have their own datacenter (largest in the world and building another larger one)

by small_model

2/27/2026 at 10:38:56 PM

The function of fully autonomous AI weaponry is to offload the responsibility for making kill decisions away from the soldier.

Whether the model works accurately or inaccurately doesn’t matter. In some ways, having a trigger-happy model may serve the US military’s interests better than a discerning one.

by gcr

2/28/2026 at 3:13:10 AM

Does Grok suck? I have never used it.

by koakuma-chan

2/28/2026 at 8:43:07 AM

Grok is quite good for explaining tweets, summarizing meme videos and chatting about celebrities. But chat and image inference only, it was performing really poor in agentic work the last time I tried.

by lodovic

2/27/2026 at 10:41:17 PM

All American institutions are hemorrhaging talent and knowledge, their foundations intentionally being rotted out. The kleptocrats running the departments and military don't care if we are competent or if their job is done - because their real job is to steal every last drop of wealth they can.

So this whole thing screams of a charade to give Elon Musk more of our hard-earned money as a favor from Trump.

by Tadpole9181

2/27/2026 at 9:16:09 PM

https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/openais-sam-altman-calls-for-de-...

by loss_flow

2/27/2026 at 9:23:45 PM

Sounds like they also have the same limitations. And my guess is that thats non-negotiable as that would likely cause some of their staff to quit if they did lift those limitations.

by readitalready

2/27/2026 at 9:44:48 PM

Now we will all see how much power the president has over the markets which clearly prefer Anthropics offering

by taurath

2/28/2026 at 5:38:44 AM

if we can't have it no one can?

by romulussilvia

2/27/2026 at 10:23:26 PM

For anybody who thinks it's about Trump vs other administration: it's not, both AI surveillance of all people and using it for automatic fight was just bound to happen.

The only question is whether the safety of the models were really done well enough to protect the people and be a net positive force in the world.

I guess if they would be safely trained to do more good than bad (how Dario and SamA said), there wouldn't even be a need for the contract terms.

by xiphias2

2/27/2026 at 10:28:31 PM

It would/will be extremely irresponsible to put non-deterministic and fallible models in charge of weapons. We are not close to having solved the problem of ensuring AI pursues good outcomes

by seanmcau

2/27/2026 at 10:49:56 PM

I agree completely. Anybody who uses the models extensively know it can do something amazing for a prompt and something awful for another. But I also know that wars are unfortunately real and there are real enemies between countries and they don't want a limited model.

by xiphias2

2/27/2026 at 11:19:31 PM

How exactly does the "limitation" affect any war the US may be in with another country?

by skeledrew

2/27/2026 at 11:41:44 PM

Probably drones targeting and automatically killing Russian people by a thinking model guessing if its Russian on Ukrainian person is a red line.

Elon Musk already denied Starlink for being used for remote killing, but at some point all these technologies will be nationalized, as they are too important not to be.

by xiphias2

2/27/2026 at 9:52:29 PM

If OpenAI and Google stay in sync with Anthropic on this, will Trump try to ban all of them from the federal government? What alternatives would they turn to?

by LordGrey

2/27/2026 at 9:57:20 PM

They might de facto take them over via the defense production act, board demands, or shut them down, and then put the screws on Google who they can already control via their shareholders.

by taurath

2/27/2026 at 9:57:11 PM

They would use Grok, as they already do.

by ben_w

2/27/2026 at 9:59:45 PM

They won't, not Google at least

There is a whole situation with dealing with military contract during Trump 1, and it didn't go well for Google, I doubt Sundar will go the same route once again.

by karmasimida

2/28/2026 at 3:19:10 AM

> [ Won't be my little defense b? Then you can't do government contracts at all! ]

by stopbulying

2/27/2026 at 10:10:17 PM

This is the Truth Social post, which the article quotes but doesn't quite convey the flavor of:

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/1161445529692...

> THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WILL NEVER ALLOW A RADICAL LEFT, WOKE COMPANY TO DICTATE HOW OUR GREAT MILITARY FIGHTS AND WINS WARS! That decision belongs to YOUR COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF, and the tremendous leaders I appoint to run our Military.

> The Leftwing nut jobs at Anthropic have made a DISASTROUS MISTAKE trying to STRONG-ARM the Department of War, and force them to obey their Terms of Service instead of our Constitution. Their selfishness is putting AMERICAN LIVES at risk, our Troops in danger, and our National Security in JEOPARDY.

> Therefore, I am directing EVERY Federal Agency in the United States Government to IMMEDIATELY CEASE all use of Anthropic’s technology. We don’t need it, we don’t want it, and will not do business with them again! There will be a Six Month phase out period for Agencies like the Department of War who are using Anthropic’s products, at various levels. Anthropic better get their act together, and be helpful during this phase out period, or I will use the Full Power of the Presidency to make them comply, with major civil and criminal consequences to follow.

> WE will decide the fate of our Country — NOT some out-of-control, Radical Left AI company run by people who have no idea what the real World is all about. Thank you for your attention to this matter. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!

  PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP

by aaronharnly

2/27/2026 at 10:16:07 PM

I mentioned his insane threats to Netflix earlier and tried to Google an article that referenced it. None of them linked or even broadly quoted it.

There's been a concerted effort to hide the fact that the US President is posting insane shit every day for years.

by ZeroGravitas

2/27/2026 at 10:24:05 PM

The sanewashing of that nutbar from every media outlet in the States has been equally as breathtaking as the rants themselves.

by abraxas

2/28/2026 at 3:35:32 AM

Link to the Netflix threats?

by nubg

2/28/2026 at 9:24:13 AM

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/1161110738408...

You're probably thinking, that's not so bad. He didn't even threaten to invade an ally or call this overqualified black woman "low-IQ" like he often does but to any time traveller flung forward from just a decade ago, this is indistinguishable from Idiocracy.

by ZeroGravitas

2/28/2026 at 6:04:46 AM

The concerted effort to hide his insane rants is unforgivable.

by aceazzameen

2/27/2026 at 10:20:40 PM

You really think it’s him tapping away those Troots?

by cluckindan

2/27/2026 at 10:30:45 PM

Coveffe

by harry8

2/28/2026 at 2:27:01 AM

Get it right! :-) covfefe

by jibal

2/28/2026 at 8:12:06 AM

"Want it done right, do it yourself." First said by Donanld J. Trump, 1863

by harry8

2/27/2026 at 10:18:31 PM

It's just so great to have a president whose public statements sound like a 3-year-old having a tantrum. Every agency must immediately cease all use of Anthropic's technology, except the agencies that are using Anthropic's products?

by wrs

2/28/2026 at 2:01:00 PM

He writes like a deranged uncle on FACEBOOK... which explains a lot about why he is popular.

by datadrivenangel

2/27/2026 at 10:20:53 PM

Does anyone know (more precisely) what the military wanted to use Claude for and what Anthropic was resisting?

by Covzire

2/27/2026 at 10:24:35 PM

Their statement called out automatic weapons targeting and domestic surveillance as two lines they would not cross

by mingus88

2/27/2026 at 10:40:06 PM

Anthropic's statement specified mass domestic surveillance. Not all domestic surveillance. And fully autonomous weapons with today's systems. Not automatic targeting. And not never.

by pseudalopex

2/28/2026 at 2:05:38 AM

Not targeting, automatic firing. They want a human to chose when to fire, but they AI can so the targeting.

by orwin

2/27/2026 at 10:30:28 PM

But.. we already have automatic weapons targeting systems and the PATRIOT act, which enjoys bi-partisan support already providing basically limitless domestic surveillance.

by Covzire

2/27/2026 at 10:37:58 PM

Doesn't mean Anthropic wants their tech making it even worse.

by goatlover

2/27/2026 at 10:45:46 PM

Agreed, but the details released so far are pretty sparse on what exactly was being asked. If they're resisting general AI to help missiles find their target better, then I think it's pretty foolish of Anthropic to resist because that's happening come hell or high water. If it's about resisting mass surveileance without a warrant of American citizens, then I'd cheer Anthropic on for pulling out, but we just don't know apparently.

by Covzire

2/27/2026 at 10:57:59 PM

The Department of Defense demanded contracts which would allow any lawful use. Anthropic refused to allow mass domestic surveillance or fully autonomous weapons until fully autonomous weapons could be more reliable.[1]

[1] https://www.anthropic.com/news/statement-department-of-war

by pseudalopex

2/27/2026 at 10:11:08 PM

The messaging is not normal, the intent is absolutely abhorrent. With every passing week, the rhetoric coming from him gets more violent: I'm worried.

by p-o

2/27/2026 at 10:18:42 PM

Now you're worried? Come on. He is using the Bully Pulpit to try and pressure other companies to toeing the line. At least someone had the balls to tell them to get fucked instead of kowtowing.

by garciasn

2/27/2026 at 10:23:03 PM

He is also clearly in the throes of dementia, as his father was. It’s a common symptom of dementia patients to become rude and violent as their facilities slip away

If only we had a constitutional process for removing presidents from office as they become obviously unfit for the office…

by mingus88

2/28/2026 at 2:56:27 AM

this reads like someone who hasn't seen dementia up close. I don't see his behavior as much different than term 1. simply more malevolent.

there's no obvious word searching. he's always been simplistic and unencumbered by the need for logical consistency. he was never a word smith. he has his stock phrases (eg, "many people are saying...<insert lie>"), which he uses as a crutch, but also to great effect.

as someone who HAS seen dementia from a to z, I don't see it here.

by busyant

2/28/2026 at 3:41:34 AM

Yeah I don’t see it either. What I see is a guy openly admitting he’s a dictator because he thinks that’s what’s needed. A guy that knows he doesn’t have much to lose and wants to do whatever crazy shit comes into his head

by mountainriver

2/27/2026 at 11:07:27 PM

I mean him being in the throes of dementia is certainly possible; but, more absolutely, he's a fucking asshole. The problem isn't just him, however; it's his entire administration, Congress, and the SCOTUS he stacked that further enable the insanity.

by garciasn

2/27/2026 at 11:11:19 PM

He was rude and violent years ago. There is nothing new about those two. They made him win presidency twice.

He is more incoherent and demented.

by watwut

2/27/2026 at 10:31:50 PM

yes, but this is his administration; full stop neogestapo. Hes surrounded and politically floated by white Christian nationalists. His dementia just lubricates the existing harm vectors.

by cyanydeez

2/28/2026 at 6:01:06 AM

I am not worried, he is behaving the same way he did in 2020 when he fucked up his reelection by ranting like a dictator.

He is gonna get slaughtered in midterms, be hamstrung his last two years and then go away.

by ericmcer

2/27/2026 at 10:25:13 PM

[flagged]

by NotGMan

2/27/2026 at 10:57:55 PM

[flagged]

by GorbachevyChase

2/28/2026 at 2:03:26 AM

The only two things anthropic ask is that AI cannot be used for:

- domestic mass surveillance,

- autonomous kill decision.

That's it. The reason for the first one is clear: it violate the spirit of the fourth amendment at least.

The reason for the second is that if a kill decision is taken, let's say by an ICE agent who just got told 'im not mad at you' or something similar that would surely enrage him, he is responsible in front of the law. If it's an autonomous drone that shoots on political opponent/protestors, no one is responsible.

I will add that Google and anthropic made their AI play wargames. 93% of the time, their models escalate to the nuclear option.

by orwin

2/27/2026 at 9:30:49 PM

Gift link: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/27/us/politics/anthropic-mil...

Text (it is short):

> President Trump on Friday ordered all federal agencies to stop using artificial intelligence technology made by Anthropic, an order that could vastly complicate intelligence analysis and defense work.

> Writing on Truth Social, Mr. Trump used harsh words for Anthropic calling it a “radical Left AI company run by people who have no idea what the real World is all about.”

> Still, Mr. Trump announced a “Six Month phase out” for the Pentagon and some other agencies, a period of time that could allow for more extended negotiations between Anthropic and the Defense Department. Calling the company “Leftwing nut jobs,” he said they had made a mistake trying to strong-arm the Pentagon.

> Mr. Trump’s statement came as the Pentagon and Anthropic were, despite an escalating war of words, continuing to negotiate a compromise. While some current and former American officials had expressed hope of some sort of deal before the Pentagon’s 5:01 p.m. deadline, Mr. Trump’s comments will undoubtedly complicate matters.

The Truth Social post, which is, well, you can decide for yourself: https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/1161445529692...

by aaronharnly

2/27/2026 at 9:35:58 PM

Presumably the real world is all about hanging out with Russian oligarchs and child traffickers

by simmerup

2/27/2026 at 10:24:20 PM

And a payoff or two to the presidential protection racket. Nice AI business you have there, what a shame if something happened to it…

by smackeyacky

2/27/2026 at 9:28:27 PM

Why does Trump want to give a woke radical leftist AI the ability to autonomously kill people? Doesn't seem like the smartest decision.

by noelsusman

2/27/2026 at 10:03:43 PM

> "Anthropic better get their act together, and be helpful during this phase out period, or I will use the Full Power of the Presidency to make them comply, with major civil and criminal consequences to follow," Trump added.

The Al Capone executive.

No surprise most CEOs are either licking his butt or staying silent, there's clearly a climate of fear.

by epolanski

2/27/2026 at 10:16:31 PM

They just know the circus will end fairly soon. No point in undermining its own future for this clown show

by nixass

2/27/2026 at 9:31:21 PM

oh no! anyway...

by Sebguer

2/27/2026 at 11:06:58 PM

As you can see the president is under a lot of pressure.

He is losing the ICE war, because the protesters used tactics of the civil rights movements of the past pretty effectively and now he is stuck between losing the narrative of protecting Americans by further escalation or losing power as a direct consequence of said escalation and more Americans getting murdered by government agents.

Of the 8 or so wars he pretended to have stopped only two are still in a non-active state. The world is more dangerous than it ever was in our lifetime.

But I’m glad the man got a noble peace prize and probably put it right next to the golden pager he got from jerusalems favorite war criminal.

Let’s not forget the fourth anniversary of putins three day special operation just passed. A special operation by a special boy, that should have been ended on day one of his presidency.

He is losing the war of the public opinion, as he is approaching the midterms with the lowest approval rating and on top of that the whole Epstein thing is sticking to his shoes and gets smellier by the day and he can’t shake it off.

The Supreme Court took away his bonking stick, and he ordered a pretty impressive armada to the front door of Iran but khameni is old and rather wants to die a martyr than on youtube getting hung by the neck and dragged through Teheran behind a dumping truck.

And now those damn woke lunatics at anthropic won’t allow him to spy on his political enemies and every American and if necessary kill them autonomously, probably with the same red button he uses to order fresh BigMacs into the oval office.

The poor man is really not having a good time. But I’m sure he can dry his tears with a few of those crypto billions he made from selling the presidency.

This is such an interesting timeline. In fourty years none of the younger people are going to believe us, we are all going to eat our rat pudding in a trump home for the elderly under constant ai supervision, because they think we’re insane.

by Jamesbeam

2/28/2026 at 2:34:32 AM

This should come as no surprise. The administration has no tolerance for anyone with “values” or “scruples” that challenge their power. They fired Judge Advocate Generals (military lawyers) that refused to authorize strikes on civilian boats, for one recent example. If you say ‘no’ for any reason, they fire you.

by _alternator_

2/28/2026 at 6:09:29 AM

I think it has also been pretty clear from the beginning of his current term that the primary principle of this administration is to pass whatever has been paid for. E.g. the literally hundreds of executive orders that he started signing en masse the moment he got elected, none of which were written in his style or pen or even possible to write in such volume for a single person in a single day.

by Llamamoe

2/28/2026 at 4:00:00 AM

The administration has no tolerance for anyone...who refuses to get their knees dirty.

by jimt1234

2/28/2026 at 3:11:54 AM

[flagged]

by b65e8bee43c2ed0

2/28/2026 at 3:34:50 AM

No other administration has used the "supply chain risk" designation against an American company. This is unprecedented.

by wslack

2/28/2026 at 6:49:01 AM

It's done worse in this area. Biden administration refused contracts with any company that didn't require all in-person employees to get the covid19 vaccine, so the firing extended down to the employees. The courts stopped this when boosters got added to the requirement.

by jim33442

2/28/2026 at 3:51:57 AM

because it is a big fucking risk if the tool you rely on can refuse to function at a critical moment, and the vendor publicly brags about refusing to eliminate such refusals. ta-ta, see you in 3 years.

by b65e8bee43c2ed0

2/28/2026 at 3:30:06 AM

Why (the fuck) would a government of the people, believe they have the rights over free enterprise tools, to take them and use them for nefarious purposes

by mountainriver

2/28/2026 at 3:38:29 AM

Have you paid attention during any of the Administrations? In this post-Snowden era we have no excuse for not knowing the "government of the people" has been doing this to companies for a long time. AT&T for example. This Administration just does it out in the open.

by typeofhuman

2/28/2026 at 3:21:30 AM

Should humans tolerate contracts that say “you may not use this thing in this particular way”

by crummy

2/28/2026 at 5:28:41 AM

That's exactly what the Terms of Service are that you agree to for every service you've ever paid for

by pants2

2/28/2026 at 3:29:26 AM

We do, it’s called the law and applies to a lot of things.

by techpression

2/28/2026 at 3:40:14 AM

[flagged]

by twocommits

2/28/2026 at 3:18:19 AM

Russia got a deal of a rube

by whattheheckheck

2/28/2026 at 5:51:17 AM

Ban all AI use from government, so maybe we can actually have real humans in charge again.

by userbinator

2/28/2026 at 2:57:20 AM

Shouldn't this be great news that the government is banned from using Anthropic?

I don't know why suddenly the narrative here turns to spinning this as "Trump is evil" when this is actually keeping the AI company out of the government's reach.

The level of cognitive dissonance here is unreal.

by faanghacker

2/28/2026 at 3:01:15 AM

pathetic

by deep_noz

2/27/2026 at 10:13:14 PM

Would love nothing more than for sama to refuse government contracts in solidarity. Free enterprise isn’t free

by demuis

2/28/2026 at 4:31:21 AM

Oh yeah he's refusing out of solidarity alright :eyeroll:

https://x.com/sama/status/2027578652477821175?s=20

Tonight, we reached an agreement with the Department of War to deploy our models in their classified network.

In all of our interactions, the DoW displayed a deep respect for safety and a desire to partner to achieve the best possible outcome.

AI safety and wide distribution of benefits are the core of our mission. Two of > our most important safety principles are prohibitions on domestic mass surveillance and human responsibility for the use of force, including for autonomous weapon systems. The DoW agrees with these principles, reflects them in law and policy, and we put them into our agreement.

We also will build technical safeguards to ensure our models behave as they should, which the DoW also wanted. We will deploy FDEs to help with our models and to ensure their safety, we will deploy on cloud networks only.

We are asking the DoW to offer these same terms to all AI companies, which in our opinion we think everyone should be willing to accept. We have expressed our > strong desire to see things de-escalate away from legal and governmental actions and towards reasonable agreements.

We remain committed to serve all of humanity as best we can. The world is a complicated, messy, and sometimes dangerous place.

Amazing / weird that this sounds like a lot of the stuff Amodei said Anthropic asked for

by nickledave

2/28/2026 at 5:31:57 AM

What this confirms is that it was never about Anthropic's terms. The administration has a bigger issue with Anthropic and that was just an excuse to ditch them. What exactly the issue was I'm not sure. Maybe OAI paid off the right people.

by pants2

2/28/2026 at 5:46:45 AM

I don't think it does. It could just as well show openai accepted terms which are unacceptable for anthropic.

If they say "we define mass surveillance as flagging terrorist-looking people automatically with the Family Guy approach, but it's ok if a person types a name to look it up" then you can say "we agreed not to have mass surveillance by AI" or "that's still mass surveillance and we disagree with it".

Give Sam Altman's prior experience with worldcoin, I'm inclined to think he doesn't give a dime about mass surveillance.

by riffraff

2/28/2026 at 5:41:10 AM

Addidionally: Why wasnt X.ai considered before Openai? also noted a lot of hate from Musk towards Anthropic lately.

by lodovic

2/27/2026 at 10:30:56 PM

Idk who would even want them as a client. They'll change course on you every 4 years at minimum potentially in massive ways that might force you to change your product putting all your other users at risk - and they might just do that to you legislatively, anyway!

by NittLion78

2/28/2026 at 12:43:10 AM

They have unlimited, free money.

by LEDThereBeLight

2/27/2026 at 10:24:56 PM

OpenAI courts Trump and their executives donate to MAGA foundations directly.

by sama2026

2/27/2026 at 10:42:56 PM

From Axios:

What to watch: OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said in a memo to staff on Thursday night that the company will uphold the same red lines as Anthropic on surveillance and autonomous weapons, but still hopes to strike a deal with the Pentagon.

https://www.axios.com/2026/02/27/anthropic-pentagon-supply-c...

by pogue

2/28/2026 at 3:53:30 AM

UPDATE: Sam Altman just agreed to be the DoD's replacement but says he made them agree to no mass surveillance/autonomous weapons (the same terms that were rejected from Anthropic? Everyone is skeptical in the replies on Twitter)

https://xcancel.com/sama/status/2027578508042723599

by pogue

2/28/2026 at 3:40:59 AM

Reminds me of Google, Apple, Microsoft, and Facebook releasing similarly-worded statements denying that they would share information with NSA PRISM, despite the Snowden docs

by mapmeld

2/28/2026 at 3:41:02 AM

Sam Altman is a serial liar and grifter. He personally donated $1M to Trump. Don't believe a word in that press release.

by stackghost

2/27/2026 at 10:24:17 PM

The same Sam Altman that brought us Worldcoin + The Orb?

by et-al

2/28/2026 at 3:31:27 AM

[flagged]

by mountainriver

2/28/2026 at 4:22:47 AM

You mean, stole it from Google’s internal labs.

by drivebyhooting

2/28/2026 at 4:42:33 AM

Google is the Xerox Parc of AI, but unlike Xerox they decided to enter the ring with Gemini which is now quite good.

(For those who don't know the history, Xerox Parc and SRI before them invented the modern PC GUI and a lot of other modern PC stuff in the late 70s and early 80s, which Apple copied and then everyone else copied from Apple. Xerox paid a lot for R&D but never used it at all since it would cannibalize their copier business, classic innovators dilemma.)

by api

2/28/2026 at 5:34:34 AM

Meanwhile Google is murdering their websearch business with chatbots. Rightly so, as that business needs to die, or at least materially transform.

by H8crilA

2/28/2026 at 5:33:06 AM

Your delusion should be studied. Narcissists love people like you

by camillomiller

2/28/2026 at 3:55:48 AM

This sucks but is unfortunately true.

by moralestapia

2/27/2026 at 9:21:33 PM

[dead]

by shablulman

2/27/2026 at 10:30:33 PM

[flagged]

by small_model

2/27/2026 at 11:12:21 PM

I wouldnt want an AI model to hold my military hostage. DOD should have strong requirements when making contracts with AI companies, including having the models be on their own infrastructure, fully locked down with a master prompt they can see and update.

by giancarlostoro

2/28/2026 at 3:07:18 AM

Nobody would have an issue with that. The problem here is DoD insisting on that kind of control, then threatening and retaliating against Anthropic for declining to participate rather than simply walking away and engaging with a competitor.

by Jordan-117

2/28/2026 at 7:42:41 AM

I get the feeling a lot of people do have an issue with that. Remember when people were freaking out that Google was taking on DoD work?

by giancarlostoro

2/27/2026 at 9:32:08 PM

Well, thats good news!!! hopefully the full government contract can be cancelled and Anthropic can actually live by their own words, and not just apply it to the US!

by calgoo