2/19/2026 at 2:34:44 PM
by speckx
2/19/2026 at 9:22:50 PM
This seems about the equivalent of "Coca-cola knew sugar was bad, but they put it in their drink anyway!"Am I missing something?
Is this more like tabacco for some reason? Why do we accept sugar and not tabacco?
by pedalpete
2/19/2026 at 9:38:10 PM
Insane the same government coming to these conclusions will be fine with this same CEO requiring the ID of kidsby dpoloncsak
2/19/2026 at 8:12:12 PM
Discussions on a number of the linked posts instead of this digest:Mark Zuckerberg Grilled on Usage Goals and Underage Users at California Trial https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47075245
Zuckerberg overruled 18 wellbeing experts to keep beauty filters on Insta https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47070743
Mark Zuckerberg Lied to Congress. We Can't Trust His Testimony https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47060486
by ChrisArchitect
2/19/2026 at 7:08:42 PM
Interesting mix of active and passive language in the headline. He covered up that he knew? He covered up that the kids were being hurt? Who was hurting the kids — they were just being in a state of hurt, and as a CEO, somehow looked outside the palace walls and saw that suffering existed, yet did not meditate for seven years under an oak tree in response.by hyperhello
2/19/2026 at 8:17:20 PM
[dead]by cindyllm