alt.hn

12/25/2025 at 9:36:48 PM

Google is 'gradually rolling out' option to change your gmail.com address

 https://9to5google.com/2025/12/24/google-change-gmail-addresses/

by geox

12/25/2025 at 10:29:37 PM

I wish they'd let me recover my original -- I lost my TOTP generator, and the codes I'd written down in a paper notebook were rejected. I even hunted down the electronic copy in case there was a transcription error -- seemed like some failure in their systems was causing me to lose access despite having followed proper procedures.

Lost a decade and a half of correspondence dating back to my teenage years. I had imported my phone number I'd had since I was 16 into voice, and it doubled as my Signal number. I even had a Gsuite subscription so I could use their (admittedly decently) UI to power my firstname @ lastname dot com email address.

I will never use their services again, I was really digusted by this failure.

by firefax

12/25/2025 at 11:15:21 PM

I had something kinda similar happen to my hotmail account. While I didn't lose access to it, I lost more than a decade of correspondence dating back to my teenage years. The reason was that Microsoft at some point required you to "login" once every 30 days. It seems they only counted logins through their web interface or something like that, so even though I was receiving emails daily, I didn't trigger a "login" in their system. They then deleted all my emails, but I could still login.

by macrolime

12/25/2025 at 11:53:07 PM

This happened to me ten years ago. A while later they did the same thing with my Minecraft login that I had purchased before the EULA was in place; I’ve avoided their services like the plague since then.

by lurk2

12/25/2025 at 10:44:33 PM

I still think about my lost address that I obtained when Gmail was invite only. My family still occasionally CCs it and it drives me nuts, I would pay money to at least have it shutdown so they don’t think I received an email. I had email forwarding to another address when stolen and immediately after it was stolen it had the weirdest messages, I tried multiple ways reaching out to google and it still bugs me I was unsuccessful. I’d love the their of my account to at least have it shutdown

by fosco

12/25/2025 at 11:40:09 PM

Maybe you should send it enough mail to fill it up and the it would reject emails? Send a bunch of emails with large attachments and avoid getting marked as spam.

by gleenn

12/25/2025 at 11:00:39 PM

I got mine when it was invite only too, I had it a very long time.

I use protonmail now -- I think the "free" model enables providers to shrug and go "hey you don't pay us" (if there is support at all -- I've never been able to speak to a human about this issue)

by firefax

12/25/2025 at 11:16:35 PM

>I think the "free" model enables providers to shrug and go "hey you don't pay us" (if there is support at all -- I've never been able to speak to a human about this issue)

I also have paid services a lot of money where customer service was nonexistent until I did a credit card chargeback or raised an issue with government regulators.

I'm trying to figure out exactly what I want to push my state legislature to encode into law with regards to customer service minimums that would cover anyone doing business in the state, free or paid.

by colechristensen

12/26/2025 at 4:36:59 AM

I'm in the camp that paying makes you a customer. Inversely using a free service makes you a user, not a customer.

And as you correctly note, there I'd no "user service" department.

You can of course push for any law you like, but I expect laws protecting "users" to be toothless. Basically the TOS will boil down to "we can do anything we like" - which I guess is more or less what they say now.

I find it helpful to think of users as distinct from customers because it let's you understand the provider company motivations.

For example, Google's customer's are advertisers. Hence they cull services not conducive to advertising.

Most startups see VCs as the customer. Their business model is to sell shares to VCs in round after round. Seen in that light their attitude to users is rational and users only exist as props to VC sales.

VCs (and founders) are chasing an exit, which is usually acquisition or aquihire. Your use of the service will thus rarely survive the exit.

These are not things to be outraged about. They are all completely rational and predictable outcomes. When you use a service, these are factors you should evaluate.

by bruce511

12/26/2025 at 6:01:40 PM

> I'm in the camp that paying makes you a customer. Inversely using a free service makes you a user, not a customer.

I agree, but what do you do when a large player like Google kills the competition by making their service available for free? I used to pay for email hosting with good customer support. That company went out of business when free GMail wrecked their business model. I moved to another hosting service, which almost immediately went out of business for the same reason.

Something similar happened with YouTube. It's chock full of ads and/or subscriptions now because they subsidized it long enough to ensure competitors couldn't gain a foothold.

by permonst

12/27/2025 at 4:29:01 AM

Thats not exactly a new question. Netscape would also like an answer.

Obviously the short answer, for you personally, is "nothing". You cannot affect either the closing business or Google.

The somewhat longer answer is that there are certainly other mail services that currently exist. So there are still options. And yes, those services will need to differentiate their offering.

[Some will no doubt mention the option to self-host. I did that myself for about 15 years. It's a lot of extra work to do that though.]

Obviously some services (like YouTube) are double-sided. Consumers go there because producers are there and vice versa. But, as you point out, even there you have choices - free with ads, or subscription. (Not that you'll get any "customer support" from Google.)

by bruce511

12/27/2025 at 7:50:53 AM

it's even worse than this.

your paid email address would now always end up in people's spam folder by default, because the big 2 don't trust any email not originating from the big 2

by tpoacher

12/26/2025 at 12:24:15 AM

I had this issue with my alternative account. Despite my main account being associated (not by recovery, I think this predates that feature), and most messages being forwaded to my main I was never able to successfully recover the credentials.

by valiant55

12/26/2025 at 8:39:58 AM

I had the same issue with my Hotmail address. I know the address and password, but Microsoft won’t let me login. And they ask ridiculous things like, what emails are in the inbox. I haven’t used this address for 20 years, I just want to access the Hotmail address from when I was a teenager.

by thiht

12/26/2025 at 9:26:00 AM

Send some emails to the address, then you'll know what is in the inbox :)

by jopsen

12/26/2025 at 9:38:02 AM

Haha that’s clever, I will try this

by thiht

12/26/2025 at 10:09:33 AM

>I just want to access the Hotmail address from when I was a teenager.

Logging in doesn't solve your problem. It gets way worse after you log in [0]. At least now you still have hope.

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36000161

by sillyfluke

12/26/2025 at 5:27:52 AM

Gmail is a throwaway email. I lost my SIM and hence can't log in anymore.

Never ever rely on Gmail.

by Beijinger

12/26/2025 at 8:54:44 AM

Huh? Are phone numbers tied to physical sims in your country? You can't just ask the phone company to give you a new sim with the same number?

by markdown

12/27/2025 at 12:34:22 AM

It was a Google Project Fi phone with a very valuable number (for me, many 8, no 4). Was not able to recover.

by Beijinger

12/26/2025 at 9:31:16 AM

If you’re on a contract that can work.

If it’s a PAYG sim card then you’re out of luck without the PUK code, which, if you’ve lost the sim then you have most assuredly lost (or never had).

PAYG is a lot more common in parts of western Europe than contracts.

People associate contracts with “overly expensive” phone deals.

by dijit

12/26/2025 at 11:17:10 AM

no, I got my puk code from my phone operator when I moved services before. at least in the UK it works that way.

by exe34

12/26/2025 at 11:37:48 AM

Yes, but you are unlikely to have your PUK code (its on the card you got your sim with) if you have also lost the sim.

Its a much more losable bit of plastic, and without it (or a contract) why would an operator give you the PUK code for a number they can’t prove you used to have access to? It would be impossible to tell if you are trying to steal someones number.

by dijit

12/26/2025 at 7:02:29 PM

you walk into the shop with your passport or driving licence....

by exe34

12/26/2025 at 7:12:09 PM

Try it

by dijit

12/26/2025 at 7:21:06 PM

Are you telling me this is a lie: https://www.vodafone.co.uk/help/unlocking-your-phone

by exe34

12/26/2025 at 7:23:09 PM

Please continue up the line to find the context.

The grandparent does not have his sim card.

by dijit

12/27/2025 at 1:53:43 AM

> The grandparent does not have his sim card.

which is not necessary for transferring your number to a new SIM. when you lose your phone here, you don't lose your number.

by exe34

12/27/2025 at 4:52:10 PM

Depends. Google was not able to recover my Google Project Fi number because I was abroad. And when I was back in the US it was "too late"

by Beijinger

12/25/2025 at 11:05:47 PM

> I will never use their services again, I was really digusted by this failure

Isn’t this inherent to not choosing an (EDIT: external) account-recovery method?

The flip side to allowing account recovery at Google’s discretion is lessened security for everyone. (Obviously not black and white. And I agree Google should have flexibility for old accounts. But it’s an odd thing to reject a major provider over.)

by JumpCrisscross

12/26/2025 at 1:27:05 AM

You can have all the right details and recovery methods but if at some point they request you to provide the code they sent to the phone you don't have for the last 10 years......... That's it.

by subscribed

12/26/2025 at 2:10:13 AM

> if at some point they request you to provide the code they sent to the phone you don't have for the last 10 years

AFAIK once 2FA is up, you can remove your phone number from GMail.

I know it takes time to set up a recovery account (in case the account is inactive for x months), to remove a phone number, etc. but if one's GMail is important it could be worth doing both now if it hasn't already been done.

by TacticalCoder

12/26/2025 at 1:48:31 PM

Oh, and no, recovery email account is useless. Its been set since the inception and there's not way to use it to regain control over the account.

It's a deliberate misnoner.

by subscribed

12/26/2025 at 1:47:30 PM

You will eventually be forced to re-add it at some point.

The point is (it's not my account) that unless you religiously update the phone number in all your accounts you will at some point lose access to some of them despite being able to prove with all the other details it's you who created and used them.

Just because.

Because phone number is a very valuable identifier for the ad company.

by subscribed

12/27/2025 at 5:53:35 AM

I don't think you will be forced. I removed it long ago, and still don't have it.

by theragra

12/28/2025 at 7:41:02 PM

Go take a look on GrapheneOS discussion forum, there's several people reporting it already.

by subscribed

12/27/2025 at 4:42:01 PM

I can't get my Rockstar account because it has 2FA with an app that I somehow lost.

by anal_reactor

12/25/2025 at 11:27:40 PM

They did have a method to recover their account that they tried, though - they said that they used the account recovery codes, but that they were rejected. (Those would be the codes that Google gives you when you initially set up 2FA.)

by Sophira

12/26/2025 at 1:10:57 AM

When I first got the account, my cell phone was a recovery method. Later in life I imported the cell into google voice... thus when the recovery codes failed, there was no other option.

by firefax

12/25/2025 at 11:35:39 PM

Sorry, I meant an external recovery method. Another e-mail address or a phone number.

by JumpCrisscross

12/26/2025 at 1:28:00 AM

Another email address is useless.

Another phone humber only works if you didn't lose that phone.

by subscribed

12/26/2025 at 6:22:29 AM

Why would another email address be useless?

by ashv

12/26/2025 at 7:23:33 AM

I had email address X (gmail) that I hadn't logged into for a long time. One day I tried to log in to it. Correct password, but Google, for some reason, simply decided there's something suspicious about my login and blocked it. X had Y as the "recovery email", and I had access to Y, and I indeed received an email from Google sent to Y that it blocked a suspicious login to X. However, THERE WAS NO WAY TO USE Y TO GAIN ACCESS TO X. Google simply did not offer that option for X, and I had no idea why.

by ncann

12/26/2025 at 8:09:47 AM

Google doesn't allow you to recover a Google account using only your recovery email address. Despite its name, the recovery email address is not used to recover Google accounts AFAICT, it's only used to receive notifications about security-related events.

by Flimm

12/26/2025 at 1:45:02 PM

This is not a recovery address, it's a lie. Its notifications address, mostly used to force us to draw some parts of our social graph for them.

by subscribed

12/25/2025 at 11:23:45 PM

op said they had recovery codes but they didn’t work.

by loloquwowndueo

12/26/2025 at 11:50:14 AM

I am fearful of losing my first.last@gmail.com and last.com access presently. Any Google Wallet/Payment folks that might help me..? Please see email in profile if so. Would really appreciate it.

Story is I started a new job. I tried to add a corporate address for a corporate card to Google Wallet. This tripped some security indicator requiring me to upload government-issued ID. I did so twice without it working despite first/last/address match. I have tried also submitting an employment verification letter with the corporate address. Haven't heard back on the last attempt.

I have also written but I have low hope that'll work. (Update: Nope, "Billing and Collections" isn't "Payments" but at least they wrote back).

Because of the incomplete verification, all Google service payments are rejected right now. I am presently frantically emptying my Google One storage to get back under the free tier before my paid One subscription runs out. Literally, because I cannot submit a $2 payment I am right now removing attachments from 20 years of correspondence.

This stinks. I just need a human to review what I submitted given the above context. There should be some middle ground between rejecting a new credit card address and de facto locking down someone's entire collection of Google services via manufacturing an inability to pay.

by RhysU

12/26/2025 at 9:08:04 AM

> I will never use their services again, I was really digusted by this failure

Was there ever really an agreement that they'd be storing your cherished memories for decades? I still treat email the same way I've done since the 90s. Your email provider is just a cache but you download and backup the messages yourself.

Hopefully this has been a wake up call for you. If you care about data then you need a copy that you control and have a good backup plan.

by globular-toast

12/25/2025 at 10:40:25 PM

Yikes. This post is an unsettling reminder that gmail is a single point of failure in my personal and financial security.

by ryukoposting

12/25/2025 at 10:59:57 PM

Email services in general. My worst nightmare is my email provider (which isn't Google) going dark and losing access to everything.

by cedws

12/25/2025 at 11:06:29 PM

You can use a custom domain with most providers, so when they go dark you can at least migrate to another one.

by saint_yossarian

12/26/2025 at 12:03:55 AM

Two things about fronting with your own domain:

1. You have to own that domain forever, until or at least until you're 100% confident that an email intended for you will never be sent to that domain ever again. Even then, there are security risks with giving up the domain.

2. You give up some privacy. You can use mailbox aliases but it doesn't really matter if all the mailboxes are tied to a domain registered to your name and address.

by cedws

12/26/2025 at 1:20:04 AM

1. A little money solves this. You can register for 10 years at a time. Any decent registrar will blow up your email near your domain’s renewal date regardless of renewal status.

2. Whois privacy solves this. Free from any decent registrar.

by dangus

12/26/2025 at 12:25:29 AM

Whois privacy is basically standard these days, no?

by fragmede

12/26/2025 at 9:55:57 AM

Doesn't completely solve the problem. You now have to pay per (unaffiliated) alias since each requires an independent domain. You also become extremely vulnerable to data breaches because rather than learning that foo@provider is john.doe@provider with IP xxx you instead learn that foo@domain is John Doe, phone number, street address, credit card, etc.

This issue goes far beyond email alone. The ICANN domain system effectively rents a string out to you on a temporarily basis and mandates that an Impressum be attached to it. It's a deeply flawed scheme when viewed from the context of both historical hacker culture as well as the fundamental values of a free and open society.

by fc417fc802

12/26/2025 at 4:25:34 AM

Yes but all of your aliases would be under the same domain so one could surmise that the same person uses the domain.

by NewJazz

12/26/2025 at 8:35:55 AM

You can usually setup several domains. Some domains are very cheap to register, so you can register some inconspicuous, universal, email provider-sounding domain and add aliases at will.

by cromka

12/26/2025 at 6:37:22 AM

For (1) you can prepay i think up to 10 years? And every year you just prepay 1 year again and you will have 10 years to remember that you forgot to pay a domain registration bill.

by JackeJR

12/25/2025 at 11:18:51 PM

That is moving the point of failure to the domain registrar. Which is probably less likely, but you are always relying on someone.

by 3eb7988a1663

12/25/2025 at 11:35:59 PM

I think that the point here is that your domain registrar will pick up the phone if there is a problem, where Google clearly will not.

by dunk010

12/26/2025 at 1:19:34 AM

I use AWS to register the domain and AWS supports up to 8 different MFA factors. I have totp and 4 different passkeys registered

by UltraSane

12/25/2025 at 11:01:49 PM

If you use a password manager like Keepass, you should still be able to log into your other accounts if you lost access and at least with financial institutions you can call, ask that no changes be made with without coming into the branch and showing ID.

by firefax

12/26/2025 at 12:06:22 AM

Yes, but many companies will also drag their feet, refuse for "security reasons", or you'll just never be able to reach them in the first place because their only support is an AI concierge that tells you the same thing over and over.

As an example Anthropic and OpenAI don't let you change your email address.

by cedws

12/26/2025 at 8:35:39 AM

If you use a password manager like Keepass, you can put your TOTP into it as well. With both a password and a keyfile it's still two factors, technically.

by fph

12/26/2025 at 8:40:32 PM

Why don't you keep a copy of your email offline?

by ninalanyon

12/25/2025 at 11:38:18 PM

Worst case you need to self host

by tcfhgj

12/25/2025 at 11:40:16 PM

Great when it works. Too many senders will only deliver to widely used hosts, and silently fail for anything outside their tiny allowlist.

Note that I'm not even talking about trying to send email FROM a self-hosted account, but trying to get someone else to send email TO such an account.

by Hemospectrum

12/26/2025 at 1:17:33 AM

Realizing this is why I bought my own domain name and pointed the mx records at Gmail. This way I can change it to different mails servers if needed, even self hosted. One useful thing you can do is configure Gmail to forward mail to unknown address to a known one. So I can create addresses like Facebook@ultrasane.com or Amazon@ultrasane.com, etc

by UltraSane

12/27/2025 at 4:43:02 PM

My mother only uses the computer for fun. She scrolls Facebook and sends my aunt cringe photos. If she gets locked out of her email, no big deal.

Maybe we should just panic less.

by anal_reactor

12/26/2025 at 8:38:38 PM

I'm mystified why technically competent people keep their email in the cloud. Do they never find themselves unable to refer to an email because they are not connected to the web? Isn't obvious that you risk losing everything if the provider goes bankrupt, there is a glitch in their system, or they change the rules?

I use Thunderbird on my laptop precisely so that I have a copy of all my email. I can consult it while offline, I can switch providers, change my mail address, without losing anything and without having to rearrange anything.

by ninalanyon

12/26/2025 at 12:35:25 AM

Back up your seeds! Aegis for Android lets you do encrypted exports.

by DetectDefect

12/26/2025 at 1:09:00 AM

Or just write down the TOTP seed on paper backups instead of backup codes.

by xeonmc

12/26/2025 at 6:07:23 AM

Works for google (should!) but man there are some platforms that don’t expose the Totp code, or let you redisplay it! Sometimes they make you remove the old one before you can make a new one, too.

by jonway

12/26/2025 at 7:09:54 AM

So don't put it off until it is too late -- if you haven't already, regenerate and copy TOTP seeds to paper now.

When you set up TOTP on a new account, copy the TOTP seed to paper then and there, resist the "I'll do this later".

by cuu508

12/26/2025 at 9:45:13 AM

If it isn't backed up it doesn't exist.

Corollary (likely unpopular I'd hazard) - hardware token implementations that I can't back up to paper don't exist as far as I'm concerned.

by fc417fc802

12/26/2025 at 10:43:13 AM

My policy is to enroll multiple WebAuthn keys and treat the second, third etc. key as the backup.

by cuu508

12/26/2025 at 3:15:47 PM

I stopped using webauthn for this reason, plus the fact requires a ton of intrusive browser features and access. This surely will enrage most readers, which itself reveals an interesting conditioning that has taken place.

by DetectDefect

12/26/2025 at 9:28:27 AM

Few, but screenshot the qr code and print it out.

Even Facebook supports totp it's just well hidden.

by jopsen

12/27/2025 at 2:56:21 AM

Print or print to pdf works but feel terrible leaving pdf and printed QR codes around when I have an actual handful of HSM/security dongles in that very same desk drawer :(

by jonway

12/26/2025 at 11:44:38 AM

Instagram has them too.

by iberator

12/26/2025 at 7:38:15 AM

> seemed like some failure in their systems was causing me to lose access despite having followed proper procedures.

I had the same problem with GitHub's backup codes not working: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35735996

by nomilk

12/26/2025 at 6:57:38 AM

Whoa, I noticed something similar. I was updating my password or something a few years back and decided to test the backup codes too. They didn't work. I don't know what went wrong but that got me worried a bit.

by kalaksi

12/27/2025 at 10:03:57 AM

Let's be realistic here. The vastly more likely possibility is that you screwed up somewhere with your backup codes.

by Ferret7446

12/26/2025 at 9:29:43 AM

Wait a second - if you have gsuite it isn't a regular gmail account. Did you talk to gsuite team? If you even paid there is real support.

by rr808

12/26/2025 at 6:29:20 AM

You think that sucks, my childhood angelfire is gone.

by iwontberude

12/26/2025 at 7:19:26 AM

Try contacting their support. They did help me regain access to my late 90s angelfire account, even though the original email address I had used was long dead.

by cuu508

12/26/2025 at 1:12:49 AM

Save a picture of the TOTP QR code and print it out.

by UltraSane

12/26/2025 at 2:05:50 AM

> I will never use their services again, I was really digusted by this failure.

Without such measure anyone with your password could "reset" your 2FA.

The solution to "I may lose my 2FA" is not to make GMail a 1FA: it is to configure beforehand your GMail so that if your account is inactive for 6 months, access to your account is given to a person of your choice. It's so that a death spouse (for example) can eventually access the account.

by TacticalCoder

12/26/2025 at 1:08:04 AM

I'm paranoid and print off my TOTP key for each account I make that might matter in any way.

by trollbridge

12/26/2025 at 7:23:14 AM

This is exactly what happened to me on Dropbox, where even the backup codes did not work.

by iamthejuan

12/26/2025 at 1:11:13 PM

Are you based in the EU? You should be able to file a GDPR request for your data.

by remus

12/26/2025 at 1:26:23 AM

[dead]

by khana

12/25/2025 at 10:08:31 PM

This is so useful. a Gmail account is so much more than just an email account at this point. my first gmail account was made when anonymity and cool email was more of trend than your actual name - so i based upon my favorite book in 2006. 20 years later the account is tied to my oft used primary google voice number so lingers even with obscure and hard to spell email.

i could gave moved my google voice number, but it seems like a convoluted process and have had my number since about Grand Central acquisition.

by nytesky

12/25/2025 at 10:59:41 PM

in my experience, in/out porting with google is super quick and works great. It costs $20.00 IIRC. I port my primary phone number around to avoid unlawful surveillance, handy tool in the bag.

by jonway

12/26/2025 at 12:10:57 AM

Oh, finally. I’m one of the first.last@gmail folks, which I assumed would never change when I was 13 years old (hah!). Fast forward a few years, I got married, and am stuck with my old name in the address.

by 9dev

12/26/2025 at 2:22:40 AM

I have a first.last email, but it's created quite the interesting situation. Turns out some dude in Australia has the same first+last name as me, and he's been using firstlast@gmail.com. As far as I can find from Google's documentation, the email with no dots should be the primary and the one with dots an alias, but I'm guessing because I registered mine ages ago (back in 2006) it takes precedence. I have no idea how he hasn't noticed that his gmail emails are going to another inbox - maybe Google delivers them to us both or something? Regardless, I've gotten very personal emails (like from his therapist) and tried to reach out explaining the situation and asked these parties to let him know he needs to stop using that email, but to no avail.

Honestly the one who is at fault here is Google. If first.last and firstlast are treated as aliases, they straight up should not allow people to create them once the first exists, rather than just send emails to someone else. I've tried to respect my Australian brother's privacy (like not reading his therapist's emails and such), but not everyone is gonna do that.

by bigstrat2003

12/26/2025 at 9:58:14 AM

I have exactly the same issue (I get an insane amount of email for other Firstname Surname people that isn't me from various other places in the world), but I'm 100% sure at this point that it's people using the wrong email address, as occasionally when I contact the people to let them know they've emailed the wrong address, they have actually told me the real email address they should have used, and they were missing a number, or in one case it should have been an initial instead of the full first name.

I used to also think that Google were screwing up by allowing a 'clash' of firstname.surname and firstnamesurname, and maybe they did a bit in the 2004-2009 period, but with lots of testing over the years (sending test emails to both), I'm confident now it's 'just' other people's emails getting 'simplified' too much when being told, and it ends up being sent to me.

I do however think Google shouldn't have allowed that alias situation to arise.

I also think (based on the fact that my 'un-dotted' email alias has been successfully used to sign up for various services for the other people) that many online services just have very poor sign-up validations of emails.

by pixelesque

12/26/2025 at 10:54:56 AM

When I was a kid, I used to get a ton of emails for a guy who put the wrong email address on a dating site. It was always interesting at 13 to have to tell women that I wasn't the man they were interested in.

by huhkerrf

12/26/2025 at 4:14:04 AM

Are you sure he actually has that address? I get lots of emails mistakenly sent to me, some via a dotted version of my address, but I'm pretty sure those people (or the ones trying to contact them) have just misremembered or typoed their actual address. I'd be very surprised if Google did allow firstlast and first.last to exist as distinct addresses tied to separate acccounts.

by retsibsi

12/26/2025 at 5:06:03 AM

He has a different address than yours and has given out an incorrect version to some people (perhaps a misspelling of his name).

The dots are ignored.

by phyzome

12/26/2025 at 2:52:37 AM

I have this same issue! But I can log in with or without dots… but it’s like someone else thinks their email is my email without the dots. I can’t really figure out what is happening. The volume is way too high for it to be spam though.

by pclark

12/26/2025 at 4:11:59 AM

It would be just he uses a similar email, say last+first@gmail and gives it out incorrectly at times. Or people assume it is his. My friend has a first+last@gmail and I constantly confuse the order (or was it last+first? idk), a decade later. So you two are just seeing a subset of incorrectly addressed email, imo.

I remember a decade+ ago when this was discovered as some issue and caused a bunch of drama in the blogosphere.

by pests

12/26/2025 at 9:00:32 PM

I get emails to name@gmail for someone who has @name on Twitter - they seem unable to understand these are different things.

by Izkata

12/26/2025 at 4:01:51 PM

Same here, I have first.last since 2005: every combination of dots or not are aliases to my first.last and cannot be registered. There a thousands of first last in the world, and apparently, all of those that have a gmail account are also quite bad at giving their email address... ^^ They probably have firstlast123 and the numbers evade! I receive things daily, from simple accounts miscreated (thanks for the one month Netflix account 6 years ago) to plane tickets, notarized acts for land sell, medical things etc. I tried to respond etc. but no one understands that I'm not their recipient. Crazy.

by maximegarcia

12/26/2025 at 5:48:53 PM

As a matter of fact, I just wrongly received a confirmation email for the order of an engagement ring!

by maximegarcia

12/26/2025 at 4:20:29 AM

If Im not mistaken, periods are ignored entirely. I regularly sign up for free trials with variations on first.last@gmail.com, firstlast@gmail.com, f.i.r.s.t.last, etc and they all come to my inbox.

by grigri907

12/29/2025 at 3:46:24 PM

I have firstinitiallastname and I get A LOT of emails sent to firstinitial.lastname. Someone even used it for their bank account.

by MrMember

12/26/2025 at 8:57:50 AM

Oh god I have this problem with my firstlast@outlook.com address. I have a common english name so get the emails of other people from all over the world. The worst are subscriptions and regular invoices.

I had to give up using the address.

by markdown

12/26/2025 at 12:35:58 AM

A bit off topic, but changing your name when getting married is so strange to me. It is not at all common where I live (Belgium), in fact I don't think I personally know a single person who did.

by Dries007

12/26/2025 at 2:27:21 AM

Different cultures, different traditions. Personally I think it's a beautiful symbol of unity for one person to take the other's name (though I'm neutral as to which party should change their name, and I was perfectly willing to take my wife's name if she had wanted that), but of course that's the culture I was born into so it seems normal to me.

by bigstrat2003

12/26/2025 at 2:06:00 AM

Not only is it strange, it’s obviously very sexist in practice. In majority of the cases, it’s always the woman who changes her last name. The husband gets to keep his. I still find it very strange and shocking that powerful women with successful careers in modern society still keep changing their names after getting married.

by onesociety2022

12/26/2025 at 2:15:46 AM

By such a definition any tradition related to gender would be sexist. The tradition is that the wife will change her name. This tradition is why it makes up the majority of cases.

by charcircuit

12/26/2025 at 4:32:50 AM

No, any tradition that favors one gender over the other is sexist. Which is absolutely the case with the tradition of women taking their husband's family name when they get married.

by kelnos

12/26/2025 at 2:36:10 PM

Any tradition had to be introduced as new at some point. Matriarchies were a thing. And still are in some regions of the world.

by 47282847

12/26/2025 at 2:28:15 AM

Not really - this “tradition” as you call it obviously started back in the day when women did not have equal rights in society and only the husband’s lineage mattered.

by onesociety2022

12/26/2025 at 8:13:56 AM

How do you propose fixing that? Let the kids take both parents last names? In few generations you end with kids having their entire family tree as their last name! It might even make marrying within the tribe attractive again to keep last name single word!

by meitham

12/26/2025 at 8:00:28 PM

First there’s absolutely no real reason for a spouse to change their name just because they got married.

You can do hyphenated last names for a kid and let the kids decide what names they want to carry forward for the next generation. Or they can make up their own. The point is it’s up to them and they can choose whatever they want and not be coerced to do something because of some tradition that is rooted in sexism.

by onesociety2022

12/26/2025 at 10:54:33 AM

Portmanteaus

by iknowstuff

12/26/2025 at 2:15:03 AM

It is not sexist at all, let alone "obviously very sexist". Don't impute malicious motives to people like that, it's extremely rude.

by bigstrat2003

12/26/2025 at 4:17:35 AM

Come on man, I think it's safe to say a tradition that favor's men over women is reasonably sexist, especially given the time the tradition established women were property.

I don't think Belgium's feelings will get hurt, besides wait until you learn about all the other things that Leopold II did.

by krainboltgreene

12/26/2025 at 6:39:08 AM

I changed my name to my wife's name when we got married. Where I live, everyone can choose if they want to keep their name or change it to either ones. So its a free choice.

AND: Hope gmail will rollout this feature asap, so I can FINALLY adjust my email address too.

by vedmakk

12/27/2025 at 10:06:49 AM

These traditions stem from pre-contemporary patriarchal societies, where the man leads the household and thus his name is retained.

There have been matriarchal societies in history, but they all ceased to exist. Make of that what you will.

by Ferret7446

12/26/2025 at 8:22:44 AM

Actually it's strange to learn that outside Spain and Portugal there are other countries in EU where you do not change your name when married!

by cromka

12/26/2025 at 6:40:48 AM

I was very happy to take my wife's name when we got married. A free choice I made. And I think there is nothing weird about it.

by vedmakk

12/26/2025 at 12:44:46 AM

While optional, it's very common in France.

by revax

12/26/2025 at 1:21:14 AM

What last name do your kids use?

by UltraSane

12/26/2025 at 2:37:10 AM

Last name of father and mother, respectively.

  let motherLastName = "Carter Hughes"
  let fatherLastName = "Miller Thompson"
  let childLastName  = "Miller Carter"
  let childFullName  = "Jean Paul Miller Carter"
Or so that is how it works in many countries around the world.

You might ask, —“Why does the father’s last name go first and the mother’s second?”— That’s an old tradition, and it can change whenever enough people in our society agree. As it stands, the father’s family name tends to persist down the family tree, while the mother’s family name often disappears in each generation.

Or so that is how it works in many countries around the world.

by guessmyname

12/26/2025 at 11:30:22 AM

Ok. So your children get their grandfather's names.

The names of their grandmothers get dropped.

Only a partial improvement over just dropping the mother's name.

by ithkuil

12/26/2025 at 3:54:25 AM

You should have given a more complete example, where the parents themselves have long names to demonstrate that something does have to get dropped when you have children.

by esafak

12/26/2025 at 4:13:43 AM

Hughes and Thompson were both dropped in their example.

by pests

12/26/2025 at 5:58:18 AM

My bad, I misread the parents' names as their full names.

by esafak

12/26/2025 at 2:29:02 AM

> What last name do your kids use?

In the country where he lives (Belgium), the parents get to decide which family name the kids get.

by TacticalCoder

12/26/2025 at 9:47:19 AM

But I think you only get to decide for the first kid? All following kids will have the same family name. At least that's the rule in the Netherlands.

by t0mas88

12/26/2025 at 1:07:49 AM

Its from the days when women were property of their man.

by voidfunc

12/26/2025 at 1:19:06 AM

It hails from when family lines were important, and you can practically only have one line reflected in a name. Unsurprisingly, most societies considered the male's name to be the dominate lineage of interest, although that doesn't hold true 100% of the time.

by B-Con

12/26/2025 at 10:13:00 AM

> you can practically only have one line reflected in a name

Not true at all. You can trivially have two family names in a full legal name. In fact many cultures do exactly that to this day.

Also worth noting that the male's name being preferentially propagated makes a lot of sense in a society where the best off frequently inherited their vocation from their fathers.

by fc417fc802

12/29/2025 at 12:21:34 AM

What societies?

Keyword being "practically". Just because there is an alternative doesn't mean society will adjust.

And hyphenation isn't a solution, it only works for one generation.

by B-Con

12/29/2025 at 2:38:10 AM

> Just because there is an alternative doesn't mean society will adjust.

"It isn't practical to do" and "society at large didn't go this direction" are very different statements.

Hyphenation is two names in a trench coat. Maintaining two names indefinitely works just fine as long as you discard rather than endlessly compound. Presumably the only requirement is that it be straightforward to trace any given lineage.

The traditional approach is for women to keep their maternal name and discard their paternal name on marriage while men do the opposite. But of course any scheme could work, up to and including each person arbitrarily choosing which name to discard (not sure how they decide on ordering in that case).

Another historical approach is the Foo Barson, Baz Fooson (Barson) approach. That scheme treats the male and female lines as being entirely separate so it doesn't quite match what you're after but it was quite practical.

by fc417fc802

12/31/2025 at 6:54:46 AM

Preserving more than one lineage and providing a cohesive family name isn't practically easy, and society did not go that direction, and that likely isn't a coincidence.

Discarding names doesn't preserve lineage. If you need a book to trace the names, then the point of using a name for lineage has failed.

> The traditional approach is for women to keep their maternal name and discard their paternal name on marriage while men do the opposite

It sounds like this scheme is "men keep one name lineage, women keep another".

Which, IMO, has the practical drawback of not identifying the current family unit. Lineage was important, but so was gathering all folks together into a household. When taxes, religious ceremony, etc. occurred, there was one household name on the roster responsible. This was particularly important in societies where men held certain rights for the household.

by B-Con

12/26/2025 at 1:35:18 AM

As someone who has been stuck with an email address I created when I was 13, this would certainly be a welcome change!

by newswangerd

12/26/2025 at 4:25:44 AM

Yeah, I imagine this will help a lot of people who created retrospectively-cringey email addresses in their youth, but kept them over the years because of inertia

> After changing, Google details that your original email address will still receive emails at the same inbox as your new one and work for sign-in, and that none of your account access will change.

by mshroyer

12/26/2025 at 7:06:08 AM

> people who created retrospectively-cringey email addresses in their youth, but kept them over the years because of inertia

I feel seen in threads like this one.

by RulerOf

12/26/2025 at 11:27:12 AM

I’m in the same boat, this just feels like someone born 1996-2000 finally has some decision-making power at Google.

by frantathefranta

12/25/2025 at 10:26:19 PM

Boss move that I learned under great difficulty: a new temporary gmail alias for every jobsearch.

by HocusLocus

12/25/2025 at 11:21:23 PM

You can take this to an extreme (like I do) and use a different email address for every party with whom you communicate. It makes it rather obvious who leaked your email address, and also easy to shut them out (looking at you ActBlue!). It also leads to some amusing personal interactions. I once rebooked a cancelled flight on JetBlue at the ticket counter. When the agent saw my email she said “wow, you must really like JetBlue.” I just nodded but I was laughing inside because it’s definitely the opposite!

by raddan

12/25/2025 at 11:45:23 PM

I do this as well, and occasionally people get confused and think I work for the company I'm interacting with (enterprise@myname.com is close enough to myname@enterprise.com, I guess.) I usually don't bother to correct them, in case it gets me better treatment :)

by Dusseldorf

12/26/2025 at 12:27:31 AM

The problem is that's guessable. I add a nonce/salt/bit of random chars; enterprise_jeje38@example.com to compensate.

by fragmede

12/26/2025 at 2:29:46 AM

This is how iCloud's "Hide My Email" (suggested to you by Safari at online account creation or filling out any email field basically) works. And then it remembers those random chars for that domain. Also ensures the email delivers to you.

by Terretta

12/26/2025 at 2:12:14 AM

You're dealing with a different type of actor if that's necessary.

by throwaway808081

12/26/2025 at 3:47:42 AM

the problem is you don't know which actor you're going to be dealing with so you have to start off on that foot with everybody.

by fragmede

12/26/2025 at 12:27:08 AM

I do this too, though sometimes it leads to confusion.

FWIW, Firefox's Relay integrates into Bitwarden so you can generate emails on the fly when creating new accounts. Downside and upside is that I never know what my email address or password is.

The huge benefit is I can write down an email that'll work because I own @somedomain.mozmail.com and it'll always redirect. I do the same thing with cloudflare because I also own myrealname.com

But honestly I hate all this because the real problem is that email is a bottleneck and it is stickier than phone numbers. But my email is floating around on a bunch of lists because I've had it for years. Frankly, gmail is pretty bad about removing spam. There's a lot of spam I catch using simple filters from Thunderbird.

The extra benefit is that I'm planning on moving away from gmail and all these relays make it easier to redirect everything to a new location. So I still recommend it. You can shutdown addresses that are being abused or shared more easily but that's hard to do with your long term email address.

by godelski

12/26/2025 at 2:28:29 AM

Aka iCloud "Hide My Email"

by Terretta

12/26/2025 at 1:16:22 AM

As a hiring manager, I just want to give you a heads up that we are getting tons of fake applicants—like 5–10%—that end up being a real person on a video chat isn’t some AI assistant that uses a teleprompter interface to tell them what to say.

Usually by that point you catch them, but your recruiter screen might not etc. So now all the main HR tools are using “age of email” as one possible signal to detect fraud.

I’m sure you’re fine if your email is real (in my experience they all resolve to Onvoy LLC instead of a real cell provider), but just something to watch out for. Wouldn’t want to get overlooked because your email is brand new.

(If you’re curious about motive as I was, since of course it’ll be obvious when you start—in a lot of cases it’s that procuring an offer letter helps you obtain a visa.)

by schrodinger

12/26/2025 at 1:51:34 AM

How would you determine or estimate "age of email"? It isn't really public info. Does it imply that you are by now expected to be doxxed by data brokers to not be judged suspicious?

> I’m sure you’re fine if your email is real (in my experience they all resolve to Onvoy LLC instead of a real cell provider),

Email is expected to be resolving to "a real cell provider"? Wut?

by baobun

12/26/2025 at 4:00:01 AM

> How would you determine or estimate "age of email"? It isn't really public info. Does it imply that you are by now expected to be doxxed by data brokers to not be judged suspicious?

There are services that let you do that. Imperfect ofc as they rely on data brokers like you said. You can thank all the spammers and carders for that

by dilyevsky

12/29/2025 at 5:38:22 AM

Edit: “I’m sure you’re fine if your email is real” should be “…phone number”

(It’s too late to amend my comment)

by schrodinger

12/26/2025 at 5:09:54 AM

What does it mean for an email address to "resolve" to a cell company?

by phyzome

12/25/2025 at 10:43:13 PM

Stay tuned I have a pretty cool project I plan on launching very soon. It takes the email alias to the next level, using them as meta tags to actually allow users to trace the source of shady data exchanges. I'm working on the guide and I'm hoping to actually start a community effort here to hold companies accountable for responsible use of PII

by sans_souse

12/25/2025 at 10:57:40 PM

I'm interested. How does it differ from using:

name+service@gmail.com or service@myowndomain.com

...to figure out where the spam originated?

by iamben

12/25/2025 at 11:49:50 PM

> service@myowndomain.com

Just be aware that this may be very confusing to customer support agents: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32475178

by buu700

12/26/2025 at 12:26:43 AM

FWIW, I have been using the companyname@mydomain.com auto-alias for many years now and I've never had it challenged nor rejected by a human or a machine.

by rsync

12/26/2025 at 8:41:43 AM

I’ve also been doing it for quite a few years, and I think I had it rejected by a machine once, and I had it questioned by a human once.

I’ve had way more problems from systems that think TLDs are two or three characters (which has never been true).

by chrismorgan

12/25/2025 at 11:07:17 PM

Everybody knows name+something@ maps to name@ so it’s trivial for bad actors to strip the plus part and just spam you directly, losing the per-correspondent distinction.

by loloquwowndueo

12/25/2025 at 11:51:06 PM

Which is covered by GP's second suggestion. I add short random password-like strings to these aliases to thwart spammers who might be trying obvious aliases, turning e.g paypal@example.com into paypal.nsi873g@example.com

by homebrewer

12/26/2025 at 1:07:28 AM

I probably didn’t explain myself well.

On Gmail foo+bar@gmail.com is an “alias” for foo@gmail.com. So if you give someone foo+randomstring@gmail.com hoping that will help you map random string to that particular sender, you’re fucked - because anyone who sees foo+randomstring@gmail.com knows it’s an alias for foo@gmail.com, they can just email that directly and bypass your cleverness.

If you’re using a sane alias provider like you described, then it’s likely not an issue.

by loloquwowndueo

12/26/2025 at 1:20:08 AM

In the latter specifically it doesn't differ except for the specific methodology and what we do with the results.

by sans_souse

12/25/2025 at 10:40:06 PM

Hm interesting, do you want to tell why this helps out a lot perhaps?

by Imustaskforhelp

12/25/2025 at 11:11:37 PM

;) I was a by-invitation-beta in 2004, trust me. Even then spammers knew about the +1234 trick too. The earliest throwaway forwarders suffered from explosive growth and spam netblocks and their queue times varied greatly. The golden age of Viagra and recruiters selling prospect lists to randos. I retreated to gmail for the SPOP and because my original address was Tech Contact for 100+ domains from 1994-2000. Thousands a week. If I was smart I'd have used it as a honeypot to feed a spam blocking service.

by HocusLocus

12/26/2025 at 12:05:41 AM

Don't you get these spam mails either way ?

I have a separate email I only use to get government and public services (gas, electricity) stuff and it still receives a few hundreds of spam a week. At this point I kinda feel whitelisting the mail I want to read is the only sane option, so getting hundreds or thousands of spam mail makes little difference, while managing a portofolio of addresses is a chore.

by makeitdouble

12/25/2025 at 11:19:24 PM

It might be an iCloud+ feature only, but if you're on a Mac - you've already got the ability to generate virtual email addresses on the fly.

https://support.apple.com/en-us/105078

by vunderba

12/25/2025 at 11:29:48 PM

I love this feature and wish something like it would come to Gmail.

I can't rely on iCloud Mail anymore due to its overly aggressive silent spam filtering. Not great if you're trying to log into an account, and you can't receive the recovery emails for that account.

by wafflebot

12/26/2025 at 12:53:04 AM

That's funny, as it's the same reason I moved off Gmail. Most egregious was a reply to my message ending up in spam, and the other party was someone also on Gmail

by anonymars

12/26/2025 at 4:36:50 AM

That's where the in:anywhere search is your friend. It searches all mail.

by gcanyon

12/26/2025 at 6:00:29 AM

What I mean is, the mandatory spam filter was so braindead it sent a reply to my own message to spam, which is itself absurd, but even moreso because the other party was also using Gmail

by anonymars

12/26/2025 at 12:20:06 AM

You don’t have to use an iCloud account as a target for your real email address or even for your Apple account.

by raw_anon_1111

12/25/2025 at 10:27:09 PM

iCloud Hide My Email is pretty good for this.

by pram

12/26/2025 at 2:28:56 AM

I switched to fastmail, it imported all my gmail mail quickly, and it gives me virtual emails.

by joshribakoff

12/25/2025 at 10:38:07 PM

myjobapplicationhasbeendenied-1582-timesalready@gmail.com will certainly end well.

by njuhhktlrl

12/25/2025 at 10:50:59 PM

Seems useful. But what I really want is a way to merge google accounts, over the course of history I created 3 of them and would really prefer just a single one

by aszen

12/26/2025 at 9:01:12 AM

Why not just set up forwarding on 2 of them?

by leobg

12/27/2025 at 9:33:17 PM

That's useful for mail, but there's so many other google apps

by aszen

12/27/2025 at 10:48:58 PM

Gotcha

by leobg

12/26/2025 at 8:23:32 AM

Oh man, I hope they'll eventually also allow to use this to depart your account from Workspace into GMail. This would prove especially useful to GSuite Legacy people.

by cromka

12/25/2025 at 11:40:49 PM

It's incredible that in 2025, Google has sprung for "basic competency" after operating a bad email service for 24 years.

In my case, many years ago I changed my last name. (Turns out a lot of women also do this when they do things like... get married. But also for a progressive company everyone's purchases being permanently locked to their deadname seems... bad.) But all of my Android apps, my entire digital life at the time, was permanently locked to my old name. I had another account I created as a mail forwarder but if people sent an invite to it for a Google thing it wouldn't connect to my real account, and obviously there was an added security risk of someone stealing my forwarding account.

I remember talking to Yonatan Zunger about this problem during the Google+ era and it seemed to be renaming an account wasn't something the company was capable of.

by ocdtrekkie

12/25/2025 at 10:12:27 PM

That would have been nice to have during transition. Creating a new account and updating 3rd parties was a huge pain and never got close to 100% completion.

by kelseyfrog

12/26/2025 at 3:31:28 AM

I don't understand why they don't allow different domains. "gmail.com" is running low on email addresses; if they added more domains, they'd be able to really scale up their email offering.

by mlmonkey

12/26/2025 at 4:48:13 AM

Branding and marketing. It makes it crystal clear how popular it is.

And gmail.com isn't "running low" on addresses, I don't even know what that means. Whatever TLD you'd prefer, just append it to your username instead. Exact same amount of uniqueness.

by crazygringo

12/26/2025 at 12:14:08 AM

My gmail address is first.last@gmail.com. From time to time (and for years) I get someone else’s at firstlast@gmail.com. I thought that a Gmail account that was first.last@gmail also allowed for email sent to firstlast@gmail (no period) to reach my inbox as well.

I’ve received some sensitive/PII content over the years.

I’ve wondered if this person has access to any of my information?

Not necessarily related to this post, but wonder why and how this could happen.

by jaynate

12/26/2025 at 12:16:04 AM

> I’ve wondered if this person has access to any of my information?

No. They have just told someone your email address and that someone has sent you stuff. Anyone can do that, if they dream up your email address. People having the same name are a lot more likely to do that.

Happened to me as well. I was the first one of the 50 people or so carrying my name to register "first[.]last@gmail.com" back in 2004. At least two of my namesakes have since mistakenly used my email address. Some people just aren't very detail-oriented.

by lysace

12/26/2025 at 12:52:47 AM

I bet this is it.

I have a first.lastname@gmail.com, and my namesake has firstmlastname@gmail.com (with middle initial, and I think they originally created the GMail username without periods).

So, I sometimes receive emails intended for him, by people who saw firstmlastname and think it's firstlastname.

Maybe around a hundred emails so far, over the years.

I've gotten good at telling at a glance that an email is for him, without reading it, and forwarding and deleting.

Fortunately, my namesake is a very accomplished good-guy, so I'm happy to help.

by neilv

12/26/2025 at 2:30:40 AM

I still control my first name @gmail.com from very early on, but have never been able to put it to use because of the relentless torrent of misdelivered email.

by hamdingers

12/26/2025 at 2:55:01 AM

I still own and use mylastname@gmail.com. Yeah I get a ton of misaddressed mail, even some from a relatively famous person with the same last name.

by cdelsolar

12/26/2025 at 12:35:33 AM

Maybe their email is lastfirst@gmail.com, and people occasionally misremember your address and send your correspondence to them. In that case, yes.

More likely their email address is firstlastnumber@gmail.com or firstlast@otherprovider.com though, in which cases the types of mistakes people make are likely asymmetric.

by dmurray

12/26/2025 at 12:38:22 AM

periods are ignored in gmail addresses so there's no difference between firstlast@gmail.com and first.last@gmail.com

by jibal

12/26/2025 at 4:36:38 AM

No, I think what's happening is someone else is confused what their email address is. With Gmail, dots are not significant; any email address with dots is equivalent to the email address without any dots. (So you may have signed up as first.last@, but your email address under the hood is really firstlast. You can also send mail to your f.i.r.s.t.l.a.s.t@gmail.com, and it will be delivered to you.)

I expect that someone else with the same name as you occasionally (or all the time) forgets that their actual email address is flast@gmail.com or lastfirst@gmail.com or some other similar combo, and enters your email into signup forms. Or has friends who guessed their email address and got it wrong. Or something.

That other person doesn't have access to your information.

by kelnos

12/26/2025 at 12:35:49 AM

> I thought that a Gmail account that was first.last@gmail also allowed for email sent to firstlast@gmail (no period) to reach my inbox as well.

Yes, and you've received email that was addressed like that ... so what's your issue?

> I’ve wondered if this person has access to any of my information?

Yes, because "this person" is you.

by jibal

12/26/2025 at 12:31:00 AM

Handy tip for software testing - Gmail ignores everything after a “+” in the address. So when you’re testing different accounts in your software you can use <youremail>+1@gmail.com, <youremail>+2@gmail.com, <youremail>+3@gmail.com etc. to create many different accounts in the software that all go to the same email address.

by bluedevil2k

12/26/2025 at 1:01:15 AM

That's not just a Gmail feature. It's part of RFC 5233. See "Subaddressing."

by cardamomo

12/26/2025 at 2:42:38 AM

Indeed, also works at outlook.com / hotmail and others.

by Terretta

12/26/2025 at 10:33:00 AM

Yahoo Mail had (has?) a feature that allowed you to set an alternative email address while keeping your original email address intact.

you could be first_last@yahoo.com but also have rando_waldo@yahoo.com or ymail.com receive emails in same mailbox. And you could choose the "From" address form a drop-down when sending outbound emails or replies.

by albert_e

12/26/2025 at 12:01:50 AM

Fun fact, if someone knows your email address and clicks “forgot my password” it sends a push notification to the Gmail and YouTube apps asking to confirm or deny the sign in request. They can click that hundreds or thousands of times per day. I know because it happened to me, so I moved all of my accounts off of the email and deleted my YouTube account. :) peace out Google. Thanks for tolerating a completely insane UI, and not allowing me to turn this setting off. I can’t imagine what it’s like for the elderly who have to navigate this completely enshitified landscape.

by therobots927

12/26/2025 at 12:20:07 AM

I really want unlimited aliases for signing up to sites and tracking who is leaking my data.

by brikym

12/26/2025 at 5:14:39 AM

I sign up with a different email address on every website. (I have a catchall at my domain, rather than using plus-addressing.)

The results are more boring than you think. Almost no one leaks my address. A couple have been hacked, but almost all of those are widely known. (I did discover one early and help Troy Hunt validate a leak.) At least one Kickstarter campaign has shared my address, as has a local business. But that seems to be the extent of it.

I still do it, because I did manage to catch those things, and because it reduces cross-site correlation. But yeah, there's less skeevy behavior than you might think.

by phyzome

12/26/2025 at 12:29:17 AM

You can do something like email+site@gmail.com and it'll be delivered to email@gmail.com with the site in the To field

by squigz

12/27/2025 at 3:50:10 AM

And the spammers will omit the + alias

by brikym

12/26/2025 at 12:32:30 AM

mailbox.org hooked up to Thunderbird allows you to do so using custom domains. You can send and receive email as any string @ your domain.

by DetectDefect

12/26/2025 at 8:35:08 AM

I find that just about everybody is leaking my data. Either on purpose or accidentally. But at the end of the day I do want to order those online exotic vegetables and have very little choice of sites to do it in my country. At this point I don't care anymore. Maybe I should but in a sense it's too late. It's been decades of leaked information, I'm certain the advertising companies know me better than my friends. And still royally fail at selling me stuff. They likely use this info for more nefarious things.

I hate that 90% of the effort on the internet is about stealing information from users and serving invasive ads.

by Panoramix

12/25/2025 at 10:21:09 PM

Could this be a sign that Google is starting to think again?

For an organisation that often does deeply intelligent things, they spend such a lot of time treating their users unnecessarily poorly because obvious implications seem not to occur to them.

by nmstoker

12/25/2025 at 11:22:42 PM

I think they know about them they just don’t care enough to spend money on fixing them. They are still primarily an ad company today and their users are still primarily the product not customers.

by pretext-1

12/26/2025 at 6:10:17 AM

I wonder if they’ll make it work like Outlook.com’s support for multiple email addresses on the same account which they made a fully first class feature.

Although I primarily use a Gmail for my personal email, I still have a Hotmail address from the 90s.

For at least 10 years now Outlook.com and Microsoft accounts have supported multiple aliases.

This has allowed me to keep my old cringey box name at Hotmail address, but also have a name.surname@outlook.com on the same account, which looks nicer for Microsoft services I use, like Windows login with OneDrive.

by jonathanlydall

12/26/2025 at 9:01:01 AM

I am sure I am not the only person to have a somewhat juvenile email that has become the center of their digital lives. I would be very happy to change my email.

by caminanteblanco

12/26/2025 at 2:26:59 AM

I’m tempted to change from peter.clark@ to something more obscure; i get SO MANY emails directed at other Peter Clark’s, it’s bizarre and makes my inbox unusable.

by pclark

12/26/2025 at 2:41:34 AM

Huh. I have come to find the information about other tclancys across the world an interesting insight. Plus there was the time I was mistakenly sent a resume to review for a guy applying to become bank president; he didn't get the gig, but it wasn't because of the three or four paragraphs I sent him on spiffing up the thing.

by tclancy

12/26/2025 at 2:54:03 AM

I once got an email — addressed to some other pclark@ — which was simply a photo of a duck and the message “what duck is this?” I was so disappointed that he never thanked me for replying accurately and expeditiously.

by pclark

12/26/2025 at 12:13:58 PM

I assume it was for Petula Clark. Not because it makes sense, because it makes the absurdity a little more pungent. What kind of duck was it?

My … favorite tclancy is the one in Australia because I can sense the change in seasons when he gets to rutting and signs up for a rather specific sort of adult dating site each year.

by tclancy

12/26/2025 at 2:42:04 AM

What's stopping you?

by fragmede

12/30/2025 at 2:12:49 PM

Who uses Gmail anyway, just use proton. I am only using gmail when i need to.

by MiachelC

12/26/2025 at 1:06:08 PM

Aliases have always been a thing though. You could already create a new account and send/receive emails from that address in your original account.

by paxys

12/26/2025 at 12:04:04 AM

Wow this is massive, but will come down to whether you switch to another existing address you have. That is you have example1@gmail.com and example2@gmail.com. The first one has all your decades of data and second is name you've reserved etc. With handles you can release one and use on another account so hopefully option to do the same. Or if they could just update their account migration to support migrating all historic data that would accomplish the same.

by TechRemarker

12/26/2025 at 4:11:29 AM

There’s a class action suit about g suite free accounts that eventually become not free.

Wonder if this will be used for that at some point

by AbstractH24

12/26/2025 at 9:18:29 AM

It definitely sounds like it would make an easy way out for them.

by cromka

12/25/2025 at 11:13:07 PM

I never really had this issue because I used Google Suite with a domain. (That’s what it was called back then.)

So I can have email aliases under that domain, and even choose the alias for outgoing email.

However! This creates an extra security hole. Once I was SIM-swapped (when the attacker calls up a phone company and convinces them to redirect sms to their SIM). I had used it as a second factor at GoDaddy and had to act fast. GoDaddy had already allowed the attacker to authenticate with the sms (dumb!) and port the domain name. I realized what was happening only because the attacker sent “test” emails to my email at the domain. Had they not done that, I might have been none the wiser. I called GoDaddy and got them to cancel it, thankfully. Otherwise they’d have reset passwords armed with email AND phone number.

Since then I use the non-SMS SECOND FACTOR on most services, as NIST had been recommending for a decade now.

I personally recommend using a username+alias@gmail.com which gmail and others support, with a different but easy-to-remember alias per site, so social attackers can’t even correctly say your email to the dude on the phone.

Michael Terpin, a guy I know, got $27 million dollars in crypto stolen a decade ago by a SIM Swapper and sued AT&T for it. Not sure if he won… he moved to Puerto Rico to avoid taxes and brought Brock Pierce and other crypto bros with him LOL.

by EGreg

12/26/2025 at 7:33:37 PM

It’s definitely a welcome move, but when I try it (obviously by registering a new account since it’s not rolling out yet), most decent usernames I can come up with are already taken. A next good move would be releasing old, unused email addresses for others to claim (or even bid for, as X and Proton did). Although this would probably mean opening up another huge rabbit hole, which Google likely won’t be bothered to deal with anyway, so……Meh.

by tomy0000000

12/26/2025 at 2:55:27 AM

One of my email addresses is {MyNameKP}@gmail.com. “KP” were just random letters I picked years ago and they don’t mean anything. I also own {MyName}@hotmail.com. Someone once asked why I don’t use {MyName}@gmail.com, so I went home to try to sign up for it, but Gmail said the address already exists. I figured someone else had it and might sell, so I emailed them. Gmail auto-replied that the address doesn’t exist. Why can’t I register an address that isn’t there? Who knows ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

by guessmyname

12/26/2025 at 8:29:07 AM

Aren't email addresses reserved once you delete an account? Maybe that's what happened?

by cromka

12/25/2025 at 11:07:46 PM

an here I am still grinding on a mid-90s iname.com handle

by nacozarina

12/26/2025 at 1:48:42 AM

Hah, I had one of those. I paid $50 for a "lifetime email service" that later they wanted me to pay monthly for, so I had to bid goodbye to my null.net address

by pfooti

12/26/2025 at 12:03:50 AM

gmail sucks, I'm getting 2-3 spam emails a day, am I the only one?

by xchip

12/26/2025 at 12:51:05 AM

I wouldn't know, I don't look at my spam folder.

by bobsmooth

12/26/2025 at 9:15:50 AM

Gmail spam filtering is poor enough that a lot of obvious spam reaches the inbox as well. The quality of the spam filter alone is a good enough reason to move off gmail.

by gkbrk

12/27/2025 at 1:12:32 AM

I just mark as spam and move on. Maybe my email isn't on as many spam lists.

by bobsmooth

12/26/2025 at 12:28:09 AM

If you only get 2-3 you are lucky :)

by jwrallie

12/26/2025 at 9:50:18 AM

I have almost zero spam (that isn't filtered properly). Once in a while I catch a false positive in the spam folder but that's about it.

by marticode

12/26/2025 at 12:20:33 AM

Maybe 10 annually.

by lysace

12/26/2025 at 3:32:20 AM

Terrible idea. Will lead to nothing but chaos

by arthurcolle

12/31/2025 at 5:07:05 AM

[dead]

by Gerald_Malloy