12/11/2025 at 1:33:52 AM
It's not "Open".I wish this had another name.
I love the idea of fire and forget to a central AI aggregator. This one for LLMs, Fal for image and video. You don't need to juggle dozens of API keys or API integrations.
But these aren't open, despite it being in the name.
I want the ability to pull it all on-prem if I so choose.
I probably won't. But if I want to, I should be able to.
Don't use the name "Open" like this.
OpenAI, OpenRouter, OpenArt... Just stop already.
This isn't even fair source, let alone open. It's totally closed and opaque.
I'm half minded to make an "ActuallyOpenRouter".
(I know there are local routers, but I want hosted and managed with the ability to self-manage.)
by echelon
12/11/2025 at 2:36:22 AM
While not solving everything (such as a single bill), I implemented borgllm[0,1] as a way to get some of that convenience and development speed with no lock-in or even infra.Perhaps you’ll find it interesting.
by omneity
12/11/2025 at 2:17:52 AM
Use Hugging Face inference providers for this: https://huggingface.co/docs/inference-providers/en/indexby abidlabs
12/11/2025 at 2:11:47 AM
At this point, I'm starting to see "Open" prefix for any product/project as almost an signal for the opposite. Projects that actually are about some sort of openness (the way I see it at least), don't usually prefix their name with it, they just operate "openly" and ensure it stays that way.by embedding-shape
12/11/2025 at 2:56:01 AM
See also: "Smart"by BLKNSLVR
12/11/2025 at 11:11:15 PM
Should make a "ClosedRouter", "ClosedAI", "ClosedArt" instead, but be actually open.by BizarroLand
12/11/2025 at 4:12:43 AM
The founder named it OpenRouter because his previous startup was OpenSea.Some founders choose a prefix, then tend to use it everywhere :)
by coolspot
12/11/2025 at 12:35:33 PM
Kometimes Kreally annoyinK.Had to look up what OpenSea is. NFT. So from one hype (and arguably scam) involving GPUs to the neXt one.
by Fnoord