alt.hn

4/2/2025 at 1:10:45 PM

Mike Waltz Used Personal Gmail for Government Communications: Report

https://www.newsweek.com/mike-waltz-used-personal-gmail-government-communications-report-2053863

by ndsipa_pomu

4/2/2025 at 1:15:04 PM

Even in private businesses it's always these guys who are above the law / exceptions and too stupid to know otherwise that are the biggest risk...

This should be a job disqualifying act.

by duxup

4/2/2025 at 1:59:06 PM

Currently dealing with this at work myself. Boss has the attitude of "I have the right to run MY company however the hell I want, the Bible says so". Job searching sucks.

by MountainMan1312

4/2/2025 at 1:37:35 PM

Wilhoit's Law applies.

by cratermoon

4/2/2025 at 4:50:27 PM

“Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.”

I had heard this before but didn't know it by name. According to Slate (https://slate.com/business/2022/06/wilhoits-law-conservative...) Frank Wilhoit is an Ohioan classical-music composer and first expressed the statement in a 2018 blog comment.

by treetalker

4/2/2025 at 9:02:07 PM

Wilhoit is essentially claiming conservatives are all narcissist, which I don’t think is the case. “Rules for thee, but not for me.” People with NPD have a sense of entitlement, which is a result of the in-group/out-group framework of themselves and others that their minds create to hide their damaged sense of self worth.

Wilhoit is kind of participating in the same in-group/out-group behavior, intellectually, by dismissing conservatism as just a bunch of narcissists, which itself is a very narcissistic thing to do.

by deepfriedchokes

4/3/2025 at 12:55:44 PM

He didn’t claim that they’re narcissists so it’s weird to criticize him for your misunderstanding. His observation is simply that there is a notable difference between condoned in-group and out-group behaviour, and that’s well established enough at this point.

by acdha

4/3/2025 at 6:31:18 PM

My point was the behavior he is describing is consistent with narcissistic personality disorder, so he’s calling them that in all but name.

by deepfriedchokes

4/3/2025 at 10:04:30 PM

The behaviour he described is not unique to narcissists.

by acdha

4/3/2025 at 10:27:31 PM

Notably, Wilhoit did not say "conservatives", he said "conservativism". His observation describes a philosophy in the abstract, and does not attribute motivation or intent to individuals.

by cratermoon

4/2/2025 at 1:20:29 PM

I agree, but in modern USA, unthinking loyalty is valued far ahead of basic competence

by ndsipa_pomu

4/2/2025 at 1:28:05 PM

It's worse. They are using off-the-books communications to skirt the Presidential Records act, so they can delete their communications. They don't want incriminating evidence.

by actionfromafar

4/2/2025 at 2:10:50 PM

In a country that respected the rule of law, evidence of destroying evidence would be punished. However, it seems that the laws only apply to certain people.

by ndsipa_pomu

4/2/2025 at 3:36:58 PM

Lock her up? This would be a firable offense even at some private copmanies. The level of employee performance here is just unacceptablly poor.

by josefritzishere