4/3/2025 at 12:21:02 AM
>Of course, we don’t know when—that’s always the $1 million question—but you can do the math to find out whether or not it’s within an expected range of time, which we call the recurrence interval.We actually have come up with a very consistent techniques and results that can predict the upcoming earthquake (more than 7 Mw) based on offline public data within a few days namely short-term prediction instead of the not so useful early detection (after the earthquake event) and the useless forecast (will happen within this decade). The paper have been rejected for many times now by many prominent journals for example Nature and Science, heck it's even rejected by arXiv.org. Apparently it's a taboo to perform a study and claim on short-term earthquake by USGS, and they even make fun of it that I think is pretty childish to put in a professional website [1],[2]. However, based on our results for short-term prediction of offline data, they are very consistent for five recent major earthquakes across five earthquake prones countries.
[1] Can you predict earthquakes?
https://www.usgs.gov/index.php/faqs/can-you-predict-earthqua...
[2] 100% Chance of an Earthquake:
https://www.usgs.gov/programs/earthquake-hazards/100-chance-...
by teleforce